It does make sense. And I'm initially inclined to think ill-intent makes it worse. But on a deeper level, I think lack of intent makes it worse ... I'm not sure I can explain exactly what I mean or why I feel that way. We all know when it's obvious and that makes it much easier to point to and say, 'No!' And yes, those actions are truly more heinous, i.e. lynching, cross burning, racial slurs, swastikas. But that which is just ... well ... actions without ill-intent that are ... well ... for lack of a better way to say it ... culturally ingrained ... it's difficult to point to it with as much certainty and say, 'No!' without getting a lot of backlash. 'But I didn't mean anything by it' is a truly felt common response. That's where this whole idea of privilege is so difficult to discuss and define ... because it is just so difficult to point to with certainty and know it's wrong. It's much more difficult to get inside someone and try and get them to relearn and rethink what their actions might mean to someone else. And I'm not saying we should walk on eggshells ... but then, maybe we all should, for a while, until we can really see how what we might do in jest, or on a regular basis just because it's become second nature to us. To start to think and see how and why we say and do what we do; coming to realize how what one takes for granted another doesn't have the privilege. I know that sounds like overkill, and it is absolutely possible to take things too much the other direction, but there is also a lot that some of us just take for granted, because we've never had to give it a 2nd thought. While maybe these students in Jordon aren't racist in the purest definition of the word, but did they give it a 2nd thought, at all, about what that symbolizes for someone else, particularly members of the other team? If they thought to antagonize, or play some sort of psych out game, to gain an advantage at a basketball game, then why did they think that would have an affect, if on some level, it wasn't racially motivated, even if they couldn't really articulate that or think of it in that way? Again, maybe I'm taking it into the realm of becoming over-sensitive, and maybe I'm not exactly explaining it right, but sometimes actions with no intent to be so, still are. There have been many a time where I've been ignored, made suggestions that go on deaf ears or are put down, only to have a male colleague make the same suggestion and it's met with praise. What is that? It's not an overt act of sexism, and yet, it is, but without intent. And yet when I raise the question, it is received with a horrible response. (And that isn't even close to comparison, imo, as to what brought up this issue.) I don't have a solution. But maybe we each need to re-evaluate and truly examine each and everything we do and say, and ask the hard questions of ourselves. Maybe those student in Washington shouldn't have gone where they were told not to go, and shouldn't have donned their hats, to do ... what? What was in their minds? I can't know that for certain, but I'm pretty sure some of them were thinking, 'Heh, watch this' as if it's some joke to them, because hey, they didn't really mean anything by it. And I'm not saying they were at fault in this situation, but I think they do bear some of the responsibility. As do we all. I just question a lot. Myself more than anyone else.