Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Agreed. I have no idea how he's on this roster. He's not going to be in Minnesota next year.
  2. To learn. It's time to play guys that might be in the future. This is what rebuilds should look like.
  3. On at least one site, they didn't acquire any top 100..... But other sites like the prospects more.
  4. I wasn't kidding when I said I'd not pitch if I was Ryan. He's risking over one hundred million for these owners.....
  5. Includes trades, which I was totally wrong about earlier.
  6. If I'm Ryan, I'm pretty sure my shoulder hurts the next two months.
  7. I'm told he needs to acclimate or something. Unlike every player Minnesota traded away ....
  8. Well, Kiersey is in Minnesota, and outman is not.....
  9. Only that fangraphs calls him a fifty for fielding and running. He's an interesting get.
  10. I doubt there will be a crunch, but they have maybe 15 guys on the roster that should be next year. As you add MLB players, you're going to take spaces. I'm likely just still spicy from yesterday.
  11. Sort of? It's the hitting and fielding, for to awful drafts and development, that is the core that needed replacing. That was really my point. That part isn't changed at all. Indeed, only one new player is on the roster...... And somehow no one could be better in center than Martin or Kiersey......
  12. Yup. And they did. Hours ago. I was wrong about the rule.
  13. I thought players needed time to adjust to new teams? That's what I was told a few pages back....
  14. Can you give us a few highlights? If not, that's ok.
  15. Someone asked on another thread if I thought there would be a 40 man crunch in the off season, given all the guys that could go.....well, at some point they need to add 7 relief pitchers (or SP) to the 40 man to actually field a team next year, so, yes, I think trading for a bunch of guys that need to be on the 40 man was one of several mistakes.
  16. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/winners-and-losers-from-the-2025-trade-deadline/ In both the winners and their own special category of losers list.
  17. One trade addition added......one. Impressive!
  18. Given what Falvey said in his letter, and that they called up a bunch of guys in their mid 20s and 30s, I don't think they picked a lane.....
  19. Well, they don't think this is a rebuild, so they disagree with me. But, if you are in rebuild mode, then you don't deal for almost anyone on the 40 man.
  20. I don't think that's the core that was killing them, and they clearly think they are easily replaceable. But, sure, we can call that a former core.
×
×
  • Create New...