Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Given they are on their fourth OC, and they are always conservative, I have a theory.....
  2. I'm not upset. I said I wouldn't pay for it without changes. Lighten up. Seriously.
  3. The more things don't change....
  4. Not for me. But, IMO, this off season has been a failure so far. They may be doing great in coaching, we don't know yet, but they've missed out on impact. And now they are sorry they said it....
  5. Necessary and sufficient are two different things.... People are saying pitching is necessary, not sufficient.
  6. It's part of their job to get free agents to want to come here.
  7. Yes. That's a terrible trade for Pittsburg.
  8. Then they won't get my money!
  9. I'm fascinated that people know with such certainty what is happening.
  10. We've seen teh first two....and the last two are on PRIME, but now you have to pay.....we'll probably just watch a bunch of included stuff, we'll see.
  11. What good is targeting if you miss the target? Is all we care about effort?
  12. I don't know that Smith is a better prospect than the guys they already have. Like, I have no idea. But if he is, I doubt Gordon and Romero can get him to MN.
  13. Oh, if I had young kids, then I'd love this channel.
  14. Agreed, but it is their job to improve the team. If they can't convince free agents to come here, they need to improve on that ability. That's part of their job, just like every executive in their position.
  15. The KEY WORD was added.......added was the key word in the post.
  16. This was the largest and best free agent starting pitching class in years, maybe decades. They had one, huge, glaring, weakness. So far, they've added a number five starter, and a guy who won't be healthy until July. Would you can that a success?
  17. I can't imagine paying for this. When my "free" year is up, it won't be renewed without major changes
  18. Great win. I was clearly wrong about this game! Wish I could have watched it. I miss having a day full of football background noise....
  19. I would endorse this, but it seems odd they'd go 4 on him, but not on a pitcher (which they much more desperately need, this year and beyond). I'm not sure that last year will be pretty, but I'd rather they add players than pocket the money.
  20. Does this mean they are "in on him" or "heavy on him"?
  21. I'd suggest they win one playoff game before we talk about "championship" windows. But that's just me. YMMV, of course.
  22. Your post said fans don't get probabilities.... Did it not?
  23. No one is disagreeing, bit that had nothing to do with the Royals trades. I'd love it if the Twins traded good prospects for great players and then signed them to long extensions. If they drafted and developed pitchers.
  24. Fine, how do you pass them next year? Which was clearly the question. And, there are no guarantees.
  25. The Royals didn't sell the farm. One guy they traded turned out to be good, maybe two.
×
×
  • Create New...