Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Fair, I admit, I've wanted them to get Castro for like three years now.....so that might be clouding my brain some...
  2. I don't agree that EVERY decision has to be about 2018 or 19....they need to help the pitchers they have, even learning and working with a good, veteran, catcher could help young players. I don't agree that all 25 guys need to be about "are they here"....the young players need a veteran or three (that can actually play), imo.
  3. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Garver believer......I just want an actual catcher this year that is really good at defense and framing. You know, like I want defense to matter in the OF and other positions....
  4. I just don't think Garver is ready....what, like, 20 games at AAA? This slow pedal thru A ball, and rush thru AA/AAA thing is so backward to me.....
  5. I'd sign this guy: Willians Astudillo, C, 2.2 WAR http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/projecting-the-minor-league-free-agent-hitters/ To a AAA deal, with a good chance to be the 2nd catcher to start the year. Can't be worse than Centeno....
  6. 10 million a year is the going prices for good, but not great, FAs..... What if Garver or Murphy is never ready? What if having a great pitch framer helps the young pitchers? What if they platoon Castro and one of those guys? I really don't see the downside here.
  7. Most players go to the highest bidder, unless they have family location preferences. Even then, unless the money is close.....
  8. Can he even hit a barn? At all?
  9. I thought a moderator told us to stop with this....
  10. Fidelity for me. Partly because my company's retirement is managed there
  11. So, the plan is everything works our perfectly, and they go from 30th to above average in runs allowed? That seems like a plan not too likely to work out.... where does Polanco play, if you keep Dozier?
  12. The fact they hired Allen, and did not immediately have him run the philosophy for the whole org speaks volumes about their leadership structure, and ability to have a PROCESS that works. Let's hope they have an actual leader for pitching now.
  13. I really can't endorse a plan that assumes they compete next year.
  14. anyone follow me into NVIDIA at the beginning of the year? Or later? Or even yesterday? Seriously, it is insanely high....but it will go higher (assuming there is no recession to drag down the whole market).
  15. Based on his never having coached before in his life? Welcome to the site, but I don't want someone who has never coached at any level as a MLB coach.
  16. fair, but asking people to worry about this seems, um, unlikely to be a priority for them.
  17. so, no more links to mlbtraderumors unless I say the original source? same with every other link?
  18. Garver has, what, 20 games in AAA? And less than a full year in AA? That's the plan, one guy that can maybe hit but isn't much defensively, and a guy that was in AA last year?
  19. yes, we should all spend time trying to properly source items. It's our obligation, or something.
  20. And how does signing Castro hurt that, assuming he stays a very good defensive catcher? that's what we are talking about...right?
  21. sounds like you are in full rebuild mode.....and, if you are punting next year, you are saying they have a 3 year window, good luck with that all working out.
  22. Ah, so if someone is wrong on something, you should never listen to them. That leaves, um, zero people to listen to or do work. Seriously.
×
×
  • Create New...