Jump to content
If free agency is too rich for your blood, click here for the 35 players most likely to be traded this offseason. ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,924

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    I could see Farmer (I wouldn't do that), but are you replacing Vazquez with a cheap vet, or Camargo? Just curious, and we agree on Santana for sure, even with the current roster. That's not going to go well.
  2. Mike Sixel
    Fair enough, we'll definitely disagree on that (and where are you paying for this given their constraints?).
  3. Mike Sixel
    Yup, but the O's are in a different spot (budget, team quality, depth), and I'm asking....would YOU trade 5 years of Julien plus more for 1 of Burnes if you were the Twins FO?
  4. Mike Sixel
    You're suggesting trading 5 years of Julien and more for 1 year of Burnes? Yikes. Sure, the Brewers say yes to that all day, but no way the TWins should have done that. No way.
  5. Mike Sixel
    When I read the writeups on Fangraphs, all I can think "how are they rated this high with all the issues?"
  6. Mike Sixel
    So much risk, so much potential reward. Frankly, glad I don't need to make this decision.
  7. Mike Sixel
    Monarch is still confusing to me, and there is just too many issues for me to love it. Reacher - yup, finished, same as season one, mostly. It's fine for what it is.
  8. Mike Sixel
    Just finished Picard, and wow, so much stupid there isn't enough storage on the internet for me to post all my examples....just, wow. Started Wednesday last night, and it's already very good one episode in.
  9. Mike Sixel
    He's 37 and has 1 good year in the last 4. He's not Polanco at all.....
  10. Mike Sixel
    Which good SP is available, from a team needing immediate help at 2B, that would be traded? Seattle isn't dealing their good SP..... Who else is out there that we are so sure they could just trade a potential star hitter with 5 years of control and get value in return?
  11. Mike Sixel
    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2024-top-100-prospects/ Lee third among Minnesota prospects! And a pitcher cracks the top 100.....
  12. Mike Sixel
    That's a lot of words to state the most obvious thing ever. Wallner was one of the best left fielders in the game last year. How is this a discussion?
  13. Mike Sixel
    I can see this if I squint. They have some great upside on offense for sure. And if the bullpen is really the best in baseball, that will be huge.
  14. Mike Sixel
    The prospect coverage here is great. Thanks everyone
  15. Mike Sixel
    so you are ok having a guy you plan to have pitcher 2-3 innings when Paddock pitches? I'm guessing no. We disagree. I think there is room. I mean, that guy could pitch 2 innings another start also many weeks, especially early in the year with off days.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Buxton will get some DH time too, even if he is healthy, I'd guess.
  17. Mike Sixel
    Yup...also why the last hitter should be optionable.....seriously.
  18. Mike Sixel
    The statement was there wasn't room to use a guy for more than an innings or two for a particular starter, the order is irrelevant. The names are irrelevant. There is room to have a guy you plan to use when paddaock starts. Whatever you call it.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Have you compared it to other teams? How many shut down guys do they have? How deep are they? I mean, websites that look at every team are quite bullish.... You can't look at this team in a vacuum and compare it to other teams.
  20. Mike Sixel
    Tell that to Tampa.... There is absolutely room to do it.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Agreed. Cantenrio, which I clearly have no idea how to spell. He's got to be on an innings limit. Use those in the majors.
  22. Mike Sixel
    It's hard to see only Castro (and AK?) as OF depth, agreed.
  23. Mike Sixel
    How many lock down arms do you think most teams have? How many have this much depth? I'd guess almost none of them.
  24. Mike Sixel
    How this guy still has a job amazes me. Pisses off fans at ever opportunity, and can't get this team a tv deal.......
  25. Mike Sixel
    You'd have to find a team trying to win now, who had an elite pitcher they wanted to trade. That would be zero teams. It's not what any team would do.
×
×
  • Create New...