I find the strategy unsettling for my traditionalist views. I don't think that makes it bad, though. Given that a player who is removed from the game can't be reinserted, it isn't a costless strategy, so I don't know that it's the cheating- it's just burning assets in nontraditional ways. I do think that playing one way for 162 games and then completely changing strategies, in radical ways, for the playoffs indicates that the playoff structure might not be a true test of who is the "best team", but of course that's been true for a long time- if the Twins had been required to use a traditional rotation of starters in '87 and '91 we probably wouldn't have won. Of course, we also wouldn't have faced Koufax 3 times in 7 games in '65. Should an NFL team have to tell its opponent what defenses it will use for the first ten plays of each game, or can they change strategy to respond to their opponent? My biggest problem is I'm sick of staying up so late watching 26 pitching changes. If that causes me to quit watching, and there are 50 million people like me, then MLB might actually care.