The most amount of player has little correlation to WAR accumulated. It would be strange to praise a team for being able to draft well when the large number of players produce little results. Some here seem to think the number of players is significant. The important piece of the draft is to produce productive players. If over the last 17 years the Twins managed to draft a fifth starter, a long reliever, other bullpen arms and a utility player to go along with their one good player every other year they would be called great drafters of talent by the logic of those deriding the Twin's drafting. Now, the other extreme, if every draft the Twins plucked one player who produced 10 WAR or more, and not any other players that made the major leagues, they would not be good drafting by the number of players reaching the major leagues, but they could have one heck of a good team. I think the stat geeks need to find a better method to evaluate.