Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Linus

Verified Member
  • Posts

    6,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Linus

  1. I agree about the overall strategy being confusing but what I was referring to is really a reflection on the Pohlads. If you are committed to extending good players then bring them up early and get em going. If you are not going to extend guys then you don’t want to waste 1.5 years of the five because they weren’t quite ready for the bigs. Honestly, if you can develop players this would be the way to go for mid- market teams. Then again there is that development elephants in the room.
  2. Plus the way the Twins are operating you have to look at each player as a five year option (they will trade them before the last year of control). You want to make damn sure they are ready to contribute that whole five year period.
  3. I normally don’t pay attention to prospects this young but what he did at A+ is noteworthy. I found it telling that the highlight included Amick who had four years of college on him. I would get the best catching instructor in the system and have him coach him at each level until the bigs. A left handed hitting catcher with power and good defense is something to dream on.
  4. Advice to Twins Daily writers: don’t use the term pipeline in any future articles.
  5. Kepler is not a Twins Hall of Famer. The only thing he has going for him in this regard is longevity and the fact that Falvey couldn’t develop a legit mlb outfielder to take his place.
  6. Well written post. I see you are in high school, perhaps the Twins Daily staff should bring you on board to provide a young Twins fan perspective. I will enjoy watching these three this summer as well.
  7. Funderburk would go through all the challenges in a half inning - guy thinks everything is a strike, perhaps because he doesn’t know what they look like 😀. Jeffers seemed good at it last spring.
  8. This is an important point. Permit me to expand on it a little further. Many fans get excited about rankings, projections, etc. which is fun and fine. The only true measuring stick is how many bona fide big leaguers did you get out of the farm system or international draft, etc? It’s remindful of the older college pitchers the Twins draft. A bunch of them get to A+ and AA with decent numbers and everyone gets excited. Yet it terms of actual big league production it hasn’t been great yet if you focus on minor league numbers things would appear rosy. Specifically considering ERod, I think the bust potential is substantial. I hope he is the next Willie Mays but I will be cautious in my hopes. People cite Judge and a few others as guys with high strike out rates in the minors but are great in the bigs. True enough. Now take all the guys that had high strike out rates in the minors and see what percentage thrived in the bigs. Citing future HOF players as the norm is a fools errand. I hope E Rod thrives in St Paul and gets the chance to play every day for the Twins this summer sometime so we can all find out for sure.
  9. I think WPA is interesting. Not so much in trying to value players but just the underlying data saying in this situation run expectancy is this and then what happens with certain outcomes.
  10. Keaschall and Culpepper should be flipped (Keaschall should be even lower). Culpepper becoming a solid big league SS is really important. If can do it our infield will fall into place for the next several years. If he can’t do it, we will trading our most valuable assets to plug that hole (I am not counting on Houston). Keaschall plays positions where we have guys already. He also is likely to regress from his hitting debut and his defense is not stellar. I like him as a starter but he isn’t likely to be a main cog on a playoff team.
  11. I think this theme should be flipped around. Everyone not named Buxton and Jeffers needs to step up. They are all going to have to contribute a lot more if this is going to turn around in 26. Regarding Royce we are fast approaching the time where the word potential is a dirty word. Many people post here about his high ceiling and potential - are we really sure that’s true? Sometimes I feel like it is a baseless assumption based on draft pedigree. Obviously I want him to be a great player but for me, he is very much in the suspect category.
  12. Except Nick has stated it’s not a trade value compilation but it’s not a big deal. Just doesn’t really mean anything to me anyway.
  13. This is kind of the point I’ve been repeating for a while now. Analytics are incredibly valuable and necessary. However what happens when you have that data? You make a DECISION, on that hopefully fits into a strategic plan that has been tailored to the organization. It’s quite possible to be good at one part and deficient in another. I believe that is what we have with Falvey. In the end, you are graded by the quality of your decisions as they fit into an overall plan regardless of whether those decisions are based on analytics, a scouts eye or darts on a dartboard. You are judged by the end result.
  14. It might just be me but the definition of the exercise is so vague that it’s not useful. Building the “vision” of a championship team or building an actual championship team? In what time frame? If it’s a near term time frame including next year then Jeffers would be really high on the list and Houston not even on it. If it’s three to five years Jeffers and Ober won’t be here. Appreciate the player analysis however.
  15. I’m not going to get worked up about it but the actual difference between Arcia, Kreidler or Fitzgerald is so minimal I would have just kept Fitzgerald and spent my time and energy on making the team actually better.
  16. Apparently. There is a thread titled no such thing as a bad minor league deal in the Twins talk forum.
  17. Well that’s not happening right away because they just signed Orlando Arcia to a milb deal.
  18. I agree. With only three spots on the bench (plus a backup catcher) this makes no sense. You can’t have this guy on the bench because he is so limited positionally. The only way this makes sense to me is if he is strictly an insurance policy in St Paul.
  19. I’m sure Falvey has a reason for this move……. just don’t ask me because I have no idea what he is doing
  20. Been right here for the last dozen years. I think the VAST majority of posters on this site understand the Twins aren’t going to spend like the Dodgers. In fact many are more interested in playing prospects over any veteran. And a whole bunch expect they spend to their market size.
  21. This take is too rational for some TD posters.
×
×
  • Create New...