Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TheLeviathan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheLeviathan

  1. The Padres drew 40K. The Twins would be thrilled to even marginally beat that. They aren't pulling 200k.
  2. It's the only move they had, give them credit for not dragging their feet. I would like to see them find a local channel as well. This also cements their media revenue as "paltry" going forward, just so there are no illusions about the ramifications of this correct decision.
  3. The Penguin is quite good.
  4. There do not appear to be a lot of good teams this year. Everyone is deeply flawed in some way.
  5. Blaming the league definitely explains a decade worth of bad decision making by the team. Definitely. Or....and I know you won't accept this because you literally can't from all evidence you've provided this forum in all the years....perhaps it was just straight up greed. They've continued to take short term payouts no matter the consequences. My term fits perfectly: Stupid is taking short-term profit at the expense of the long-term health of your industry. It's been the MLB way for decades now.
  6. I'm not disagreeing with that. Or championing a rebuild even. I'm just pointing out how difficult this situation likely is. At the end of the day their depth and injury issues (which don't appear to be changing) got them from one of hte best teams in baseball to basically a .500 team in a month. If you don't have money to address those issues, then wouldn't the prudent thing to do be a rebuild? I guess I'm secretly hoping we'll have more flexibility than we think. Otherwise my pessimism is going to be hard to shake.
  7. To add to your argument, Last I checked payroll allocations can also come by trade. Who knows what could've been on the table had they been able to acquire more salary also. This FO has clearly shown a willingness to trade aggressively when allowed. One competent starting pitcher and one competent bullpen option and this team is looking at a run like the Mets. Or the D-backs. All you have to do is get in and weird stuff can happen. (You know...other than those two decades we lost every time!)
  8. I honestly have no idea how this team gets better next year and they weren't good this year. Usually...that's exactly when you should be talking "rebuild".
  9. This work has been done many times for you to the best of the ability we all have as non-owners. The truth is, when people do provide you what available evidence there is and it contradicts your narrative you choose to walk away from the conversation and then relight it again in a few days or weeks. This is your dead horse and always has been. You don't want objective measures of ownership and spending malfeasance. You wouldn't accept them if they were provided. Part of what makes that easy for you is the extent to which major league owners hide their revenues and profits from the public. They do it to get weasely stadium deals. To screw over the players in negotiations. To protect themselves from such horrid ideas as.....*checks notes* not starving their minor leaguers and paying them poverty wages. You know full well that a full accounting isn't possible and hiding behind that is tiresome. If owners were losing their hat as much as you imply, sports leagues would have a much more difficult time expanding and finding new owners. But, strangly.....they don't. I wonder why. Must be a sweet gig to build your business off taxpayers and then hide your revenues from those very same taxpayers while you cry poverty and get 20-40% of the fanbase/media to cover for you.
  10. Darnold was like Bizarro-Kirk. There were open checkdowns and out routes all game and he kept hucking it deep. He was bad.
  11. That JJ drop was a killer.
  12. Another open guy he misses. Time for drags and screens.
  13. They can't run because the Jets are loading up. He should run more, but short throws arent terrible calls. His QB has to execute.
  14. I don't get the play call issues...did you not see Addison wide open? This is bad quarterbacking, not play calling.
  15. Darnold is not on point today.
  16. Already in FG range. Put this away.
  17. They need to keep running.
  18. Over the bye let's just get "fair catch a punt every time" down. No rush. No return. Just no screw ups.
  19. Well...kicker is good!
  20. Jones being out could be a big factor in the second half.
  21. Give them nothing to build on before the half.
  22. I think that was a bad read by Darnold. He turned down underneath receivers on back to back plays.
  23. I must've missed the part I was supposed to learn in demeaning this article as "Marxist". We disagree that there is any "requirement" for public subsidy. The Twins are under no strict obligation to consider the community, but they do so at their own peril. As evidenced by the crowds at Target Field this year.
  24. I am shocked at how many people in this thread want to carry water for billionaires who took public money and actively avoid investing in the product unless it suits them. This article captures the root of the problem with both the Pohalds and funding for public education. Didn't think I'd type that today....
×
×
  • Create New...