This work has been done many times for you to the best of the ability we all have as non-owners. The truth is, when people do provide you what available evidence there is and it contradicts your narrative you choose to walk away from the conversation and then relight it again in a few days or weeks. This is your dead horse and always has been. You don't want objective measures of ownership and spending malfeasance. You wouldn't accept them if they were provided.
Part of what makes that easy for you is the extent to which major league owners hide their revenues and profits from the public. They do it to get weasely stadium deals. To screw over the players in negotiations. To protect themselves from such horrid ideas as.....*checks notes* not starving their minor leaguers and paying them poverty wages.
You know full well that a full accounting isn't possible and hiding behind that is tiresome. If owners were losing their hat as much as you imply, sports leagues would have a much more difficult time expanding and finding new owners. But, strangly.....they don't. I wonder why.
Must be a sweet gig to build your business off taxpayers and then hide your revenues from those very same taxpayers while you cry poverty and get 20-40% of the fanbase/media to cover for you.