Eh. Only if you separate them into two and only two pieces. I think the point of the response, which was largely fair, was that he's had to really make up for a lack of power, which is only one component of offense, with good contact and on-base. On top of that, he's playing great defense at a position where it isn't as important as others, and he's being compared offensively to those who also play that position. If he were OPSing 800 and playing gold glove defense at short, he wouldn't be "above average," he'd be "amazing." Player evaluation needs a pretty holistic view: all players have some things they do well and other they don't. We also have to fit players into the proper context to determine their overall worth. It's too simplistic to take just two components and say that the sum is less than the parts.