I just don't agree, and I'm happy to see Baddoo and Wade above him, not in the least because it recognizes the fact that Wade has proved it at his high level (AA), and Baddoo significantly outperformed Kiriloff at the same level (Elizabethton). Kiriloff has proven nothing at all, doing pretty decently in only a partial season in the rookie league and then missing a year. By the way, Baddoo's OPS was 1.057 at E-town. Kiriloff managed an only decent .794. Aside from that, Kiriloff - to me, and feel free to disagree - has Todd Marinovich written all over him. According to my cloudy crystal ball, he'll be amazing as a high school prospect, good as a minor leaguer, will probably make the big leagues, but won't amount to anything there. (Later drug addiction is optional but not recommended.) I am extremely skeptical of prospects with parents who are both high-level coaches and helicopters. Where's the projectability longer term? In any case, I hope to be wrong about Kiriloff, but not about Wade or Baddoo.