Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    41,377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    465

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. That's another good way to say it. If Kody Freaking Clemens is the difference between a 99-loss team and a 101-loss team, this is not a discussion I even wanted to have in the first place.
  2. It is a lot. That's the crux of the problem. Modern rosters have 13 position players. You have nine spots in the batting order to fill each day. If there are 4 guys worse than Clemens, that's your bench - or if there's 5 then that's your bench plus a starter. Either way, Clemens is getting starters' minutes. It's more beneficial to the team to upgrade the starter, than to worry about exactly who among the scrubeenies is cut. The roster problem is deep, deep, deep, and Kody Clemens has us thinking about the wrong things.
  3. When Clemens is not the big problem.... ... then you do have a big problem. I have no doubt that Kody Clemens could be a contributing player to a World Series winning team - probably as the next to last man on the bench but still seeing enough playing time to count. There are tons of players like that. Kiké Hernández for the Dodgers last year, say. Sometimes they have a career year, otherwise they don't lead the way but they don't kill you either - as long as you don't give them starters' minutes. I think that's the difference in what you and I are saying. You have in mind a nice orderly process: replace the 26th best player with someone better, and many if not most players move down in rank. Now repeat with the new 26th player. For me, if we forget about Clemens being some kind of important bar for measurement, then it doesn't matter if we accidentally replace the 21st best player too soon. The order isn't that important. There's a lot of players needing replacement (or rapid improvement) - if the goal is an actual contender. Clemens is a red herring for discussion.
  4. Miracle Max: "Well, it just so happens that your team here only mostly lost. There's a big difference between mostly lost and all lost. Now, mostly lost is almost won. But, all lost...well, with all lost, there's usually only one thing you can do. Go through the roster and look again for expiring contracts."
  5. Which part? The firings, the savings, the spending?
  6. Living in this universe. (Am I playing the game correctly?)
  7. Talent evaluation being one of the team's weaknesses, I hope this proves to be merely an overdue house cleaning.
  8. Great Value Filet Mignon. "Just like the original, only a tiny bit worse."™
  9. The Cody Klemens Bar is an interesting metric, but not an especially useful one. The bar we should be setting is the Byron Buxton Bar. Right now the Brewers have 10 batters who have 100+ PA in the second half. Of those, 6 have an OPS above Buxton's .808 second half. It's necessary but not sufficient to discard the sub-replacement level players. Don't just put mediocrities in their place. We need difference makers. IMO we're a long, long way from that in September 2025. But show us differently, Front Office; sorry if that's too much pressure, seeing as you've had only 9 years to prepare for this off-season.
  10. The Yankees are just punking us. "This roster of yours, it's looking pretty good. See us not score any runs tonight? You should totally roll with this same roster in 2026."
  11. "Who are you, you imposter? And what have you done with Simeon Woods Richardson?"
  12. I have a Moto G Stylus and I don't see that behavior today. Is it a recent problem?
  13. Can we sign Anthony DeSclafani? To be the designated middle-innings guy for our opponents?
  14. This guy. It's the hardest part of being a manager.
  15. Anthony DeSclafani. Now, where have I heard that name before?
  16. Are we really misspelling the first names of Twins players in the headlines for Twins Daily Front Page News stories now?
  17. He throws it as fast as ever. It just doesn't seem to arrive anywhere as soon.
  18. It was fun for a while, dreaming that our new FO had this special sauce that let them find useful major leaguers-to-be after other teams had passed on them in the draft for a dozen or so rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...