Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    42,526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    472

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. Moderator's note: Thanks for the observation. Not my intention to derail the thread, but as you could infer from Glunn's intro to this thread, the moderation team actually takes very seriously exactly the atmosphere you allude to. Indeed from time to time a few of the "bar's patrons" have been shown the door - some with more regret than with others - not specifically for negativity but for making it difficult for other patrons to enjoy their time at the site. Now back to the thread.
  2. Extricate them. You can do eet.
  3. Moderator's note: Please avoid turning a thread about a possible FA acquisition into a debate on front office motives and so forth. Review the TD Comments Policy if necessary: http://twinsdaily.com/minnesota-twins-talk/8837-revised-comment-policy-september-2013-a.html
  4. Looks like the thread was inadvertently closed. I'm re-opening it for the time being.
  5. Moderator note: please avoid mocking another poster's position by putting words in his mouth to imply he's a second-guesser or whatnot. That way the discussion can continue without getting sidetracked.
  6. Hey! Stop posting offensive names.
  7. Waiting for his next team report or two, to gauge just how much fun it is to have 24 C+ or better prospects.
  8. I wonder if the bosses and employees at the other 29 work sites around town know about this amazing Ladder Technology as well.
  9. Thanks a heap. I purposely put the smiley face on there so that the many GMs who read this site would think I was kidding. Now they know my info was legit.
  10. I agree the fastball is only subject to minor tweaks for additional speed, but consistency seems like one of the more coachable things. Sure, it's up to the pitcher to perform the mechanics the coach has taught; but with enough pupils you get an idea of whether the coach is effective or not. I just look at the Cardinals and their repeated ability to find gems outside of the top-20 draft picks, and question whether the key is actually the "find" step that they do so much better than everyone else, or if it's getting the potential out of what they do pick.
  11. Budget for salary is one (soft) constraint. The 25-man active roster limit is another (hard) constraint. WAR/dollar is fine but you can't assemble a 20+ WAR pitching staff, like Detroit did, one Casey Fein (0.4 WAR) at a time - unless you are allowed to use 50 men.
  12. I am wondering if it is more coaching than drafting that has been the Twins downfall.
  13. http://fuuka.worldathleticproject.org/boards/b/thumb/1376/51/1376513126653s.jpg
  14. Are you kidding? It's the off-season. Perkins is out of shape by now - probably has a fifteen pound beer gut from playing cards and xbox with his buddies that he'll have to work off next January and February.
  15. Mod note: Stop the sniping. Everyone.
  16. Moderator's note: when we speak, in the Comments Policy, of treating others with respect, derision by using terms such as "laughable" is included. Even referring that way to a statement bleeds over to the person you're addressing. It's easy to adjust one's writing style to avoid that; please do.
  17. I share this view. The Red Sox consciously converted him from starter to reliever. It's not impossible that the Twins' talent evaluators could have noticed something their Red Sox counterparts overlooked when they made this judgement, and if they feel this is the case then go for it; but lacking a reason to think the Sox are bad at their jobs I tend to see this as an undertaking with low odds of success.
  18. The Hammer closed the 2012 season hurt, and given his injury history I'd have been surprised if fellow GMs had been receptive if Ryan brought the name up in conversation during the off-season.
  19. I think there is some antipathy toward agent Boras, as well.
  20. Tonkin's on the 40-man now. Roenicke's already been outrighted. Pressly remains on the 40-man even if optioned to AAA.
  21. Is there some bigger category than "gigantic" to describe worse failures in other organizations that occurred in the same time span?
  22. This comment prompted me to re-read last year's book. Good stuff, and highly interesting to read with 20/20 hindsight. Assuming the plan is to offer Blueprints by each of the site founders, I would like to see them include one more thing: what is the fallback plan if some major assumptions fall through? For instance, with 20/20 hindsight, it looks like almost all the proposed free-agent acquisitions were based on very low estimates of what it would take to sign players, and if the aim was to keep within a certain budget, what would the blueprint become (in very general terms) if all the planned moves cost a total of $10M more than budgeted? Hopefully it's not too late in the editorial process to add a paragraph with this kind of scenario-based thinking that a real GM has to go through.
  23. A post from June 2013:
  24. Yes, that looks like the right price for that kind of talent. If the team you're trying to acquire said talent from asks too much in return, you set your sights on a Randy Ruiz type as an equivalent alternative. Righties who can handle lefty pitching but not do much else are there to be found, on the minor-league free agent pile, if a GM wants to look. Still hoping Plouffe does something to raise his value to the world, of course, and while he's still a Twin.
  25. Apparently the word "apparently" has multiple meanings, and I did not intend the one that conveys certainty, but instead the one that supposes a level of doubt. Sorry for the ambiguity.
×
×
  • Create New...