Excellent article, well researched, clearly written, though I don't come to the same conclusion.
From where does the criticism of Baldelli come? Many of us grew up on a different brand of baseball. "Baldelli" becomes a symbol of what we resent in the changed game. He is bound to catch flack (not Fleck). I am part of that herd.
Baldelli is following the script set by the FO. Neither of us truly knows how much latitude he has in going in a different direction anymore than we know his true impact within the clubhouse. He is penned in to a style of baseball which dictates his decisions. His personality lends to that role.
Is he a good manager? I think we need to remember that 52 of his games (32%) are played within a division where not one team (save Twins) had a .500 record. Talk about stacking the deck for statistical composition.
I think he is a good person for this FO. How responsible he is for the stats you listed is another issue.
I don't know if he is a good manager. I know he and his (their) brand of baseball doesn't appeal to me. After all, this is entertainment, not the chess game it has become.
What I do know? The Twins finished 87-75 in the worst division of baseball, with a disproportionate amount of those games against losing teams.
Thanks for taking the time to present such a thoroughly researched article. db