Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Out with the Old? Twins Embrace Youth Movement on Pitching Staff


    Cody Pirkl

    The Twins have loved their veteran players in recent years, and at times it’s cost them. In 2023, it appears they’ve changed their thinking when it comes to the fringes of the roster. Will it work out?

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Veteran leadership is necessary on a contending team. Still, a fine line exists where acquiring low-floor, low-ceiling players in the twilight of their careers can put a roster at a disadvantage. The lack of roster flexibility that comes with such players as well as the possibility of them falling off and damaging a team’s contention hopes is an issue the Twins have run into in recent years, and in 2023 they appear to be operating differently.

    Half of the fun of spring training is attempting to put together the Opening Day roster based on performances, interviews, etc. The Twins only had a few roster spots to fill and a handful of veteran-type players they’d been drawn to in recent years. Particularly in the bullpen, it appeared at one point that the Twins were certain to allocate a spot to a veteran reliever as we’ve seen them do in recent years.

    Jeff Hoffman had a great (thought limited) spring performance and had a minor-league contract with multiple opt-outs should he fail to make the Twins roster. It was easy to say the Twins would likely keep him rather than risk losing him based on how they’d behaved in previous seasons. He was reassigned to minor-league camp over the weekend, and on Tuesday, he opted out for an opportunity elsewhere.

    Danny Coulombe was not only a grizzled, journeyman veteran, but one the Twins are familiar with after years with the organization. He too put up stellar spring numbers before being reassigned to minor league camp. He had an agreement in his deal that if a major-league opportunity was available to him and he wasn't on the Twins roster, he could pursue it. So, he is now a member of the Baltimore Orioles, and the Twins got a little cash from them. 

    Barring a late spring waiver claim, it appears Cole Sands is set to make the Opening Day roster. Rather than utilizing his remaining options on day one, the Twins have sided with his youth and roster flexibility. If the Twins have a need for another pitcher early in April, Sands can be optioned. If he struggles, the Twins won’t allow him to stay on the team for months out of fear of losing him on waivers. On top of it all, Cole Sands has more long and short-term potential than a Joe Smith-type signing.

    Further examples can be found in the starting rotation, where the Twins have chosen to forego low-impact veteran acquisitions and instead shot for the moon in acquiring Pablo Lopez this spring. They may have chosen Kenta Maeda over Bailey Ober despite their polar opposite spring training performances, but the hope is that even post-Tommy John Maeda is better than a Dylan Bundy type. They could have earmarked $7m for a 30-something-year-old fifth starter whose upside was 150 innings of a 4.80 ERA, but they decided against it after the previous two seasons of watching such additions play out.

    Perhaps the team feels more young players are ready to play a role on the 2023 team. It’s also possible they’ve realized that youth and upside are a better bet than what they perceive as a higher floor. At any rate, it’s a welcome change after watching them allow several players to suffer through the possible end of their careers on a roster that’s trying to compete.

    The Twins are carrying very few roster-clogging veterans in 2023. They didn’t waste a moderate amount of money on players who are undoubtedly past their primes. They also don’t have too many roster spots dedicated to fringe players without options. There were certainly things to like about Danny Coulombe and Jeff Hoffman-type players, but those likable qualities have led to the Twins hanging onto this mold of player long past when they should have in the past, and it’s cost them.

    It’s a welcome change in 2023, as even the choice of Cole Sands over an option-less veteran in the bullpen allows for much more roster flexibility. The rotation has more depth and upside than it’s had in years. The Twins finally dialing back on bottom-tier free agents and waiver claims to fill out their roster makes for a much more interesting squad, and opens the door for a wave of youth to spill onto the team throughout the season. The Twins have changed their approach. 

    How do you feel about these Opening Day choices? Leave a COMMENT below. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 hours ago, Danchat said:

    As I said elsewhere, I think Sands making the team has more to do with options remaining. If Hoffman and Coulombe had options, there would have likely been more consideration for holding onto them. 

    Is it smarter to roll with veterans that had a better spring and track record, or roll with a young guy who has only been marginal, while losing said veterans, because of options?  Twins could have waived those guys at any time. Now we have all eggs in one basket. Seems like a strange approach. 

    3 hours ago, Reptevia said:

    Is it smarter to roll with veterans that had a better spring and track record, or roll with a young guy who has only been marginal, while losing said veterans, because of options?  Twins could have waived those guys at any time. Now we have all eggs in one basket. Seems like a strange approach. 

    Smarter to go with the young guy with options. We know the front office struggles cutting bait on struggling vets. If they struggle, they'd struggle for months. Neither is getting cut next week if/when the team needs a fresh arm. Not just because the front office gives vets too long of leashes, but because it would be a total jerk move to the player. They have zero qualms optioning young players though.

    4 hours ago, Doctor Wu said:

    Regarding the bullpen this year, I think that having a healthy Alcala is going to make a huge difference.  With him and Lopez and Duran in the late innings the Twins SHOULD be in good hands!

    Specific to the bullpen, the threesome of Jax, Alcala and Moran can transform the bullpen from so-so to first rate if all three are able to take a step forward. Six guys capable of shutting down good lineups with the lead would be awesome. Gardy's 2006 BP was the deepest I can remember and this group could be better.

    On 3/29/2023 at 8:14 AM, Whitey333 said:

    If the Twins stay relatively healthy they should have a good chance of winning the division.  If with this roster turnover and another record Twins payroll the results should be there.  Not win ing the division or not making the playoffs with this team is not an option.  If they fail, the FO and manager must be held accountable.  Let's all hope for a fun summer of Twins baseball.

    Holding the players accountable if they suck would be my first step. Like say Pagan giving up a dinger every time he pitches. 

    On 3/29/2023 at 11:40 AM, nicksaviking said:

    But you know he was referring to controllable starting pitchers, and not specifically their ages. They can't keep trading for starters with two years of control left every year. At some point they have to let their own young arms have a real run at roster spots.

    Joe Ryan should then fit as a young starter. When the season is done, if Ober, SWR and Varland are options 6,7,and 8 combined they will likely have more starts than Maeda or Gray. The gamble the FO took is on winning. If the team wins resigning Lopez and Mahle will not be a problem. A pennant winning team should draw well enough to cover their salaries unless they get next to nothing from the cable tv deals blowing up.  I don’t think anyone saw that coming this soon. Gray’s contract should not be onerous, either given his age and history.  We shall see how the year goes




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...