Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Age Of Analytics Arrives In Minnesota


    Nick Nelson

    ... Finally

    For more than a decade, Minnesota Twins fans have been clamoring for a more analytical approach from the front office. Those cries have now been answered.

    The pivot from legendary scout Terry Ryan to relatively unknown young executive Derek Falvey at the head of baseball operations represents just about the starkest move in that direction possible, and we're already seeing evidence of it.

    Twins Video

    During our Q&A session with him at the Winter Meltdown in January, Twins Director of Baseball Research Jack Goin opined that his organization ranked around the middle of the pack when it comes to optimizing analytics, though he candidly acknowledged they don't really hold a competitive advantage in that area at this time.

    Now, the Twins are positioned to move briskly toward gaining one.

    From Old School to New School

    While his department has certainly made significant strides in recent years, I doubt that Goin would deny that Minnesota was playing catch up for a while. As forward-thinking front offices across the league began to adopt cutting-edge tracking methods and advanced statistics, a Twins franchise run by Ryan and his largely stagnant braintrust remained decidedly traditional in its philosophies.

    The "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach lost any semblance of credibility in 2016 when a lengthy stretch of disappointment culminated with the worst season in Twins history. It was clear that things were broken. So, ownership made a move to fix them.

    A track record of insularity and deference to reputation was thrown on its side with the decision to hire Falvey. Young, energetic and little-known on the national scene, he was a blinding contrast to Ryan, the heralded scout whose very presence commanded respect, and whose affable gruffness was a defining characteristic.

    At a time where many fans understandably expected a minor change in course, and maybe even a simple switch to the next in command, Twins owner Jim Pohlad and president Dave St. Peter enacted a 180-degree turn. I give them a lot of credit for that. And everything I've seen thus far leads me to believe their choice was a savvy one.

    Riding the Wave

    Across the nation, analytics and technology are increasingly gaining influence – not just in baseball, but in the sports world at large. On Tuesday night, I had the privilege of co-hosting an event at The Pitch, an entrepreneurial hub in Northeast Minneapolis with a specific focus on innovative businesses operating in the field of sport.

    We were celebrating the launch of The Ultimate Guide to SportsTech in Minnesota, which I helped compile with TECHdotMN. The digital doc serves as a window to some of the state's brightest up-and-comers in this rapidly growing space.

    Back in January, I covered the MinneAnalytics SportCon event downtown, a first-of-its kind sports analytics conference bringing together experts and execs from various corners of the industry to discuss and dissect advancements within this evolving frontier.

    One of the featured panelists of the day? None other than Falvey, who had attained his title as Chief Baseball Officer only a few months earlier.

    A top Minnesota Twins executive speaking as an authority at a conference on analytics? Not so long ago, it would have seemed unthinkable, but it's a sign of the times at Target Field. And Falvey was very much at home on that stage.

    The Puzzle Solver

    Earlier this week, the New York Times published a profile on the new Twins CBO penned by Tyler Kepner. The piece discusses Falvey's career as a pitcher at Trinity College, wherein the right-hander relied upon his studious and strategic nature rather than superior talent to stay afloat.

    That's been the ongoing story for Falvey, who never played professional baseball and joined Cleveland's front office shortly after graduating Trinity with an economics degree. "He likes working puzzles and solving problems," as Kepner put it, and he very quickly ascended ranks with the Indians while capturing the attention and admiration of baseball lifers like Terry Francona.

    Despite his background, some might skeptically question what evidence exists of Falvey being a revolutionary figure in the scope of this franchise's story. He doesn't necessarily go around openly flaunting new-age stats and advanced metrics, after all. But there's no doubt he is well versed in such matters and, to be fair, constantly evangelizing those kinds of things right off the bat can be alienating in an organization with many lingering Ryan loyalists.

    And that's also not really the point. The definition of analytics is "information resulting from the systematic analysis of data or statistics." And if you pay any attention to what Falvey says, you're bound to hear him talk about the value of data-driven decisions based on versatile sets of available info.

    You could argue that we haven't necessarily seen those elements in action yet, as the realigned front office has taken a relatively hands-off approach with roster management in the early going. But if you look for them, signs of shifting philosophy are not difficult to find.

    The New Way

    Indications that Minnesota is taking a more modern approach to building a team and organization are, perhaps, somewhat sparse up to this point, but they are certainly noticeable.

    The aggressive pursuit and signing of Jason Castro, a renowned pitching framing specialist, was an early signal. And while some of the other acquisitions may bear marks of the old regime, the reasoning and outcomes have been different.

    While I was in Fort Myers, there was a belief among many covering camp that Ryan Vogelsong had an inside track for a rotation spot, especially after Trevor May went down. Such perceptions were, in my view, based on conditioning carried over from the previous era. Bringing the slow-tossing 39-year-old north based on little more than veteran influence would have been a trademark Ryan move, to be sure, but there's a different flavor now.

    Sure enough, the Vogelsong drama ended early when he was released last week, winnowing the fifth starter competition down to pitchers whose presence in the rotation can actually yield tangible long-term benefits.

    The signing and elevation of Craig Breslow might also look like a standard TR type maneuver, given his depth of MLB experience and previous ties to the Twins. At least, until you look deeper.

    Recognizing that he was probably reaching the end of his career unless he figured out a way to gain an edge, Breslow reinvented himself, purchasing an expensive tracking device and using it to alter his delivery in order to maximize the spin on his pitches. He and his agent sold his revival by selling the data, and that struck a chord with Falvey.

    "One of the things I think, as an industry, we can be a little bit better about is using evidence to help development," the CBO explained to Twins Daily earlier this month. "I think Craig was one who just went and did that on his own, which I commend him for."

    The favorable impression went both ways. After the southpaw threw in front of scouts from numerous teams during the winter, he received nearly a dozen offers, some of which included more money than Minnesota's $1.25 million plus incentives. But by all accounts, it was Falvey's acute understanding and appreciation of what Breslow was trying to do that tilted the scales.

    There are plenty of other subtle steps toward a more analytical approach in terms of the way Falvey, along with GM Thad Levine, have begun to piece things together. There has been an evident increase in hiring within Goin's research department, with job postings popping up a few times in the past few months. Jeff Pickler, added to the big-league coaching staff in December, has a background of implementing new data and software solutions. Paul Molitor named "the deciphering of information" as a distinct area Pickler can influence.

    So What?

    Now, of course, this is all fairly meaningless for the time being. Until we see real progress on the field, any supposed differences between the new leadership and the old are based only on rhetoric and platitudes. But as someone who has longed for the Twins to distance themselves from the outdated thinking and strictly observational analysis that embodied their outward mindset as an organization, I'm beyond refreshed by the things I have seen and heard from the individuals now running the show.

    I'll leave you with this quote from Falvey. It is his response to the final question I asked him in a one-on-one session outside the Twins clubhouse when I was in camp two weeks ago.

    "On the subject of analytics," I submitted, "is there anything that you see rising to the forefront that is maybe not being looked at too much right now?" It's a question that Terry Ryan – bless his heart – would have rolled his eyes at, and vaguely answered in some unsatisfying manner.

    Here's Falvey's full answer, verbatim, with no foresight that it was coming.

    "The evolution of StatCast is something that, of all 30 teams, I think there’s a few teams that have wrapped their hands around it a bit. I think there’s more teams that need to spend more time understanding it. But we have so much more information about how a player moves on the field, and where he’s positioned at the moment each pitch is thrown, how well he goes from first to third, efficiencies, things like that. And I think we’re going to have a better understanding of how to use that information to develop players’ individual skills. For instance an outfielder, routes to the ball and otherwise, we’re now going to have evidence and data that help us better understand how he moves around in the outfield, which will allow Jeff Pickler and our other minor league coaches along the way to better train at 2 o’clock in the afternoon to help put him in a better position at 7 o’clock. So that’s exciting. I’m excited about that particular tool impacting the game and each team is gonna be in a race to try to figure out who can do it best, that’s part of the deal. That’s the competition."

    Indeed, that is the competition. And the Twins, in my humble opinion, are now far better equipped for it.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    You are correct.  I have made mistake.  I was working on fangraphs this morning (2015 and 2016 data) and I have no idea how I made that mistake. I am no longer able to edit the my post from this morning.  If one of the moderators would like to remove the sentence about the Twins being second in runs scored that would OK with me.

    But then I would also need to remove my post, and your gracious response to it. More of the latter is always good. :)

     

    Can't. Tell. If. Serious.

     

    If so, why? Based on what, in the last two years?

     

    It's not like there's been a shortage of Santana conversation in the past couple of months and my answer hasn't changed.

     

    I'm not going to defend his performance the last two years, it's bad, and I know the defensive metrics hate him. But he makes the minimum, can backfill at a couple of positions, has a couple of really good tools, (briefly) flashed some skills, and can ultimately be cut for little cost. I don't mind giving him one more shot at the roster, he's not exactly blocking anyone worthwhile.

     

    If there was a player on another team like him that got cut, I would be ok if the Twins to pick him up and gave him a look. If the coaches want another crack at him, bully on them.

     

    Use of analytics is not the only thing that needs to be improved. Also needed is improving the willingness to look at things differently, admit when mistakes have been made, and grow from that experience. The last several years seemed like an extended Groundhog Day, with repeated bad results followed by a "I'd do the same thing again" mentality. Bill James used to hate being associated with statistics, because he thought his key insight was to try to look at things from different angles. Use or misuse of analytics is a symptom, but was not the core problem of the previous regime. Time will tell if Falvey and Levine can change the culture to one of mental flexibility and improvement.

     

    This is an insightful and well-articulated summary. I'd add two additional things that I see evidence of with Falvey that I thought were woefully lacking under St. Peter/Ryan. One is being more strategic, as opposed to tactical, about virtually every aspect of organizing and operating the baseball operations. The second is greater competence when it comes to qualitative analysis. The evidence I'm seeing of this most notably comes from Falvey's comments about interpersonal stuff, about culture, things like that. So I'm very much heartened that it appears we're not dealing with some smug nerd who's developed a love affair with all the new technology that captures useable information. Falvey has an executive's strategic perspective about taking advantage of information resources to drive improvements. That he values qualitative judgments probably as much or more than quantitative analysis is a huge plus for me.

     

    It's not like there's been a shortage of Santana conversation in the past couple of months and my answer hasn't changed.

     

    I'm not going to defend his performance the last two years, it's bad, and I know the defensive metrics hate him. But he makes the minimum, can backfill at a couple of positions, has a couple of really good tools, (briefly) flashed some skills, and can ultimately be cut for little cost. I don't mind giving him one more shot at the roster, he's not exactly blocking anyone worthwhile.

     

    If there was a player on another team like him that got cut, I would be ok if the Twins to pick him up and gave him a look. If the coaches want another crack at him, bully on them.

    I'm about as low on Santana as possible, but this is a reasonable and well articulated defense of keeping him around, for the time being, 

     

    It's not like there's been a shortage of Santana conversation in the past couple of months and my answer hasn't changed.

     

    I'm not going to defend his performance the last two years, it's bad, and I know the defensive metrics hate him. But he makes the minimum, can backfill at a couple of positions, has a couple of really good tools, (briefly) flashed some skills, and can ultimately be cut for little cost. I don't mind giving him one more shot at the roster, he's not exactly blocking anyone worthwhile.

     

    If there was a player on another team like him that got cut, I would be ok if the Twins to pick him up and gave him a look. If the coaches want another crack at him, bully on them.

     

    In other words: Danny Santana is kind of the position player equivalent of Tonkin at the moment, no?

     

    In other words: Danny Santana is kind of the position player equivalent of Tonkin at the moment, no?

     

    Sounds about right. Guys with no options left given another chance because they might have some upside and there isn't a clear better alternative.

     

    Also a really good chance neither is on the roster by the end of the year.

    Sounds about right. Guys with no options left given another chance because they might have some upside and there isn't a clear better alternative.

     

    Also a really good chance neither is on the roster by the end of the year.

    If there's a really good chance they won't be on the roster by the end of the year, there's no good reason for them to be there now. That they are is an indication the front office failed to replace them with someone who is an asset, and likely WILL be there come September. "Eh, he's cheap and easy to replace" isn't the front office I want.

     

    I don't actually think Tonkin is the same as Santana, by the way. I don't see the "tools" you mentioned above for Santana, while Tonkin at least throws hard and gets K's. Thats upside.

    I've read quite a few comments stating that Falvey/Lavine look a lot like Terry Ryan based on the off season moves.

     

    I read these comments and thnk to myself... Of course they do.

     

    All those people employed by the Twins have jobs and they do something. They sit in the meetings and they speak up. They are a huge part of the process that produces the final product. A GM or POBO don't sit in a room isolated with a laptop and build rosters like you and I put together our fantasy baseball teams. I'm not aware of a house cleaning so basically... The same people that were the machine that produced what we Were... Are the same people that are the machine that is producing what we are doing now.

     

    Imagine yourself walking in as the head of an existing operation in 4th quarter. Meeting your new staff for the first time. Do you start by just tossing them all out and have an entire new staff by 1st quarter before you can evaluate them individually? Probably not because there may be some babies in that bath water. If you don't toss them out... Do you simply ignore them? Probably not because that isn't a very smart way to build what will need to be important relationships with the babies in the bath water in the future.

     

    So what do you do? You start by listening to them and taking them seriously while starting by changing the structure. You give them the direction and the new tools that will be different under your leadership. Things they need to make better decisions and provide better advocacy and counsel and then you evaluate them after you see how they do under the new system. If they can't adapt... A replacement will be searched for and found but this is going to take a little time and I'm guessing that is what 2017 is going to be.

     

    You don't like Tonkin or Santana. There are people in the room who obviously do like them and those people probably liked them last year and they are still here.

     

    Increased analytics is part of this process... Jason Castro is part of this process.

     

    It's not time to blame Falvey/Lavine yet. 2017 needs to be the year that they start the evaluations and start to clean things up one individual at a time in the offices and on the field when the data starts rolling in. I'm not disappointed by who begins the year... My disappointment will begin when I see who remains if the ship goes down again.

    If there's a really good chance they won't be on the roster by the end of the year, there's no good reason for them to be there now. That they are is an indication the front office failed to replace them with someone who is an asset, and likely WILL be there come September. "Eh, he's cheap and easy to replace" isn't the front office I want.

     

    I don't actually think Tonkin is the same as Santana, by the way. I don't see the "tools" you mentioned above for Santana, while Tonkin at least throws hard and gets K's. Thats upside.

    I think you undersell Santana a little relative to Tonkin here (but who cares really), but otherwise I'm with you on this. Shouldn't have been too hard to add players in the offseason that would have been an upgrade. I don't have much good to say about the offseason with this as the end result. The Twins could unexpectedly over perform in the lineup and rotation and still have the bullpen sink any chance.

     

    So what do you do? You start by listening to them and taking them seriously while starting by changing the structure. You give them the direction and the new tools that will be different under your leadership. Things they need to make better decisions and provide better advocacy and counsel and then you evaluate them after you see how they do under the new system. If they can't adapt... A replacement will be searched for and found but this is going to take a little time and I'm guessing that is what 2017 is going to be.

    [...]

    It's not time to blame Falvey/Lavine yet. 2017 needs to be the year that they start the evaluations and start to clean things up one individual at a time in the offices and on the field when the data starts rolling in. I'm not disappointed by who begins the year... My disappointment will begin when I see who remains if the ship goes down again.

     

    Exactly. 2017 is a year of evaluating what is here. The players are probably known quantities so what Falvey/Levine are evaluating are the non-players. Front office, coaching staff, managers at all levels of the organization. If there are individuals already here willing and able to go in a new organizational direction there's a good chance they'll be retained.
     

    For instance, they don't want to be the bad guys that got rid of Molitor. If Molitor can adapt his style to theirs I'm sure that works in his favor and will be taken into account for 2018.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...