Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Should the Twins make Ryan Jeffers the Qualifying Offer?

    Prior to a broken hamate bone in his contract year, Ryan Jeffers was the best player on the Twins. With no clear replacement for 2027, should they briefly make Jeffers the highest-paid catcher in baseball?

    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Ryan Jeffers was the best player on the Twins through the first quarter of the 2026 season. In 37 games, he slashed .295/.408/.541, with a .949 OPS about 60% above league average. That OPS is the best in the league among primary catchers with at least 140 plate appearances, and by fWAR, he ranks fifth, despite not playing since May 18. He’s also graded out as an average defender behind the plate, and he was on track to play about 120 games between catcher and DH. Simply put, he was playing like one of the premier catchers in baseball.

    Due to Jeffers’s broken hamate bone, he will remain out of commission for another 4-6 weeks, by most estimates. He struck an optimistic tone when he met with reporters this week, but even he noted that he can't predict how things will go, and that he was advised not to rush it.

    The Twins sorely miss him, as his backups Victor Caratini and Alex Jackson have combined to hit just over .200 and have not provided even average defense behind the plate. Jeffers is eligible for free agency this offseason. Let’s break down the case and context for him to receive a qualifying offer. There are a lot of moving pieces here, so buckle up.

    What is a qualifying offer?
    Per the current CBA, free agents are eligible to receive a qualifying offer from their current team once in their career. Since this is Jeffers's first time eligible for free agency, the Twins can give him the qualifying offer. The qualifying offer is a one-year contract worth the average yearly salary of the 125 highest-paid players the previous year. For the 2026 season, that was approximately $22 million, and for 2027, it will likely be slightly higher. Let’s conservatively call it $23 million.

    If the player accepts the offer, they will return to their team for one more year. If they reject the offer, they will be a free agent. However, other teams are disincentivized from signing the player because they will lose a draft pick (or two, depending on their payroll) the following season. The original team will receive an additional draft pick between the first and fourth rounds as compensation for losing the player, varying based on their revenue-sharing status.

    Of note, the ongoing CBA negotiations ahead of the 2027 season will (probably) not affect the qualifying offers at the end of the 2026 season. Even if the entire system were removed in the 2027 CBA, the 2026 qualifying offers will be grandfathered in because they occurred before the current CBA expires.

    Why would the Twins extend a qualifying offer to Ryan Jeffers?
    Well, obviously, the primary reason would be that Jeffers is a good catcher. It’s unlikely that Jeffers is truly the best offensive catcher in baseball, but he has been a good hitter over the past four seasons—about 20% better than league average—at a position where the average hitter is below league average. His defense is not outstanding, or potentially even good, but it’s average, and good enough that he’s not a disaster at the most difficult position to play.

    Furthermore, the alternatives are not appetizing. Caratini and Jackson are both under contract for 2027 (with Caratini owed $7 million), but neither has given much reason to have confidence they will be dependable everyday options. The Twins have a handful of high-minors catchers, such as Noah Cardenas and David Bañuelos, but none of them have starting catcher potential. Eduardo Tait is their top catching prospect, but he’s a 19-year-old at High-A. They might draft Georgia Tech catcher Vahn Lackey, but even if he’s fast-tracked to the majors, he shouldn’t be counted on to be the everyday catcher in 2027.

    There's also the subject of Jeffers's trade value. If the Twins are not in contention around the trade deadline, Jeffers is a player teams will be calling about. However, he's projected to return to action just weeks before the deadline, giving teams limited time to evaluate him in a trade. Whatever packages he may have netted two weeks ago have probably been reduced since his injury, which makes the prospect of keeping him around more valuable. The return may even be less valuable than the draft-pick compensation the Twins would receive (and by next year's trade deadline, he would be eligible to be traded again, should he accept the qualifying offer).

    Is Jeffers worth a qualifying offer?
    At $23 million, Jeffers would be the highest-paid catcher in the world, by a wide margin. The top-paid catchers projected for 2027 are Atlanta’s Sean Murphy and Philadelphia’s J.T. Realmuto, at $15 million each. Jeffers would make about 50% more.

    Put simply, even if Jeffers maintained his 2026 performance upon his return from injury, he’s not worth $23 million a year in his 30s. However, he might be worth $23 million for one year. Teams are much happier to overpay for a short contract (see Kyle Tucker’s deal with the Dodgers) than they are to cut a long deal for less money per year. There’s a cliché that goes “there’s no such thing as a bad one-year deal,” and there’s some truth to that.

    The Twins might be in a position in which their best option for having a starting-caliber catcher in 2027 is to overpay Jeffers in the short term. Other free-agent options would be Tyler Stephenson and Jonah Heim. The Twins extended Jake Odorizzi a qualifying offer in 2019 in a similar situation. Odorizzi didn’t command an annual contract of $18 million, but to keep the rotation stocked, they were willing to overpay to keep him for one more year.

    Furthermore, if Jeffers rejects the qualifying offer, the Twins could receive that compensatory draft pick, likely between the first and second rounds of the 2027 MLB Draft. Which raises another question:

    Would Jeffers accept the offer? (and also, why not just extend him?)
    It’s unclear whether Jeffers would even accept the offer, though I would probably bet yes, if I were forced to take a side. He's a Scott Boras client, but he's never been thought of as this caliber of player before this season, and he's hurt right now. Even Boras's aggressiveness has limits.

    However, there have not been many catchers who have hit the open market to base this discussion on. Most free-agent catchers are of the backup variety. Since the 2019-2020 offseason, there have been seven contracts signed by catchers for more than $23 million total: Yasmani Grandal (4/73M), James McCann (4/40.6M), Realmuto (5/115.5, 3/45M), Willson Contreras (5/87.5), Christian Vázquez (3/30M), Mitch Garver (2/24M).

    That being said, Jeffers is certainly in a position to join that group, and, like Contreras, his bat is insurance against potentially moving off the catcher position. Contreras now plays first base, but in the four seasons leading up to his $87.5 million contract with St. Louis, he had a similar 118 OPS+, albeit with more plate appearances.

    Jeffers could be in line for a big, multi-year payday. His estimated contract might be enough to allow him to opt out of a one-year, $23 million deal. There’s risk to signing a short deal, especially for a catcher on the wrong side of 30. Should Jeffers have a down 2027, those multi-year deals might dry up, and as a Boras client, Jeffers is likely to try to maximize his lifetime earnings rather than take the guaranteed money—hich I suppose could be twisted to support either side of this question.

    This bit also explains why the Twins are unlikely to offer Jeffers a long-term deal. Paying Jeffers in eight figures a year for three or more years is quite risky, especially for a team that might have its catcher of the future debuting in the next couple of seasons. And especially for a team whose low payroll has been an unending topic of conversation for three years now. Speaking of which:

    Would Tom Pohlad allow the Twins to pay Jeffers $23 million next season?
    Yeah, probably.

    The Twins are running a minuscule payroll right now. They’re projected to have an approximately $70-80 million payroll after arbitration in 2027, which includes the money owed to Carlos Correa. If they part with Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober, Trevor Larnach, or Royce Lewis either at the trade deadline or the beginning of the offseason, that figure will be even lower.

    Players like Walker Jenkins, Emmanuel Rodriguez, Kaelen Culpepper, and Gabriel Gonzalez are likely to be filling roster spots on minimum-salary contracts. There’s a case to be made that even if the Twins are returning to a $105 million payroll, they’d have room for Jeffers to be paid $16 million more than his current $6.7 million salary next year.

    If the Pohlad family indeed intends to increase payroll (as Tom has suggested would have been the case this year, had he taken the reins earlier) to even $130 million, they have more than enough room to bump up Jeffers’s contract for a single year.

    When my co-host on the Twins Off-Daily Podcast (no free ads), @Lou Hennessy, proposed this idea earlier in the season, I initially scoffed a bit. But the combination of Jeffers’s performance, team needs, and room to spend, might make this a worthwhile endeavor.

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I think Jeffers could get 4 years, $50M as a free agent, but $3-5M less if he has a QO attached. $23M up front and a chance to go back on the market is going to be easy to accept.

    I don’t know why people would assume a salary cap and floor would increase free agent spending. The level of total spend proposed by MLB is lower than the current overall spend. We will see the teams above the cap scrambling to dump contracts on the teams below the minimum. That will swallow up nearly all of the available dollars. The lockout will keep teams from spending until the last minute. Next season could be the worst year ever for MLB free agents.

    53 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    How do you plan to build the team around him? If the CBA forces the Twins to up their payroll by 50-75 mil in 2027 (very real possibility that a floor of some sort is implemented, but very well may not go into effect until 2028 or 2029 to give teams a chance to adjust), an argument could be made for having 50+ million tied up in Correa, Buxton, and the catching tandem. If not, there is no way paying Ryan Jeffers the highest catcher salary in baseball is good for the Twins 2027 team. Having 30 mil wrapped up in the catcher position for a team with a 100 mil payroll, 10 of which goes to a guy not even on the team, is not a good use of resources. At all.

    Well personally I'm skeptical that's actually going to happen. But assuming a cap/floor system survives negotiations four things are worth keeping in mind. First, I think we're getting hung up on the "highest paid catcher" aspect here. It's technically true, but a QO isn't even a top 30 contract in the league by AAV, so it shouldn't cripple a team's ability to spend. Second, with a cap system in place it will actually be advantageous to front load some mid tier contracts because too much long-term dead money on the books later could hurt more than big up-front dollars. You can't do this with every contract of course, but it's not inherently bad to do once or twice. Third, on the point of "building a team around him" I get what you're saying but I don't think that's the goal. I view him as a high end regular borderline All Star type of player. Roughly 20 million for one year of a guy like that is about the normal price. Fourth, I know this is going to sound laughable given who owns our team, but they don't *have* to stop spending when they hit the floor, and there's absolutely no way they hit the cap before the end of the 2027 when he'd be a free agent again anyway. To me the question is where do we find a catcher better than Ryan Jeffers for the 2027 season? I don't see one anywhere so I'd happily overpay him while avoiding any long-term commitment. 

    48 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    It, unfortunately, also sets the bar for trade negotiations. I think trading him is the right thing to do, but I expect people will be upset with the return. When teams throw out offers the Twins can't say they need more than a late 1st round pick in value because the other teams know they aren't getting that. So the bar is set at an early third round pick type value. Why they should've traded him in the offseason.

    Every single contending team can fit Jeffers into their roster. Demand will be high and supply is quite low. Someone will bet on Jeffers hitting bombs for their team in October.

    This decision was essentially made when they signed Caratini to a two-year deal.  There was an expectation that Jeffers would be traded and Caratini would have to be the primary catcher for the remainder of this season and next season.  The anticipated QO amount does nothing to change that expectation.  The only thing that has really changed is we found out who Caratini really is as a hitter and it's unacceptable and still too far away for Tait or Diaw to come up.  I think they lost their trade window to get any real value.  Even if Jeffers comes back prior to the deadline, I don't see him tearing the cover off the ball prior to the deadline.  A team trading for him would have to take that risk and that will affect his trade value.  He likely wouldn't sign it, but a high incentive contract which, if performed, would be an overpay.  Say, a 3-35M deal with incentives to get up to a 15 to 16M AAV would potentially be fair and still a reasonable contract that you could trade if needed.

    5 hours ago, Bangkok Twins Fan said:

    At $23 million, Jeffers would be the highest-paid catcher in the world, by a wide margin. 

    I'm a bit naive about the economics of baseball these days, but that strikes me as an insane salary for a player like Jeffers. 

    My thoughts exactly ...

    The qualifying offer is to high of a price for jeffters value  , twins won't even consider it IMO  ...

    But we are definitely in  bind at the catcher position , caratini and Jackson have been terrible behind the plate and can't throw anyone out srealing ....

    2 minutes ago, Blyleven2011 said:

    My thoughts exactly ...

    The qualifying offer is to high of a price for jeffters value  , twins won't even consider it IMO  ...

    But we are definitely in  bind at the catcher position , caratini and Jackson have been terrible behind the plate and can't throw anyone out srealing ....

    Don’t lump Jackson in with Caratini. Jackson has a pop time of 1.8 seconds (very good) versus 2.06 for Caratini (nearly the worst in MLB).

    34 minutes ago, HeresWaldo said:

    Well personally I'm skeptical that's actually going to happen. But assuming a cap/floor system survives negotiations four things are worth keeping in mind. First, I think we're getting hung up on the "highest paid catcher" aspect here. It's technically true, but a QO isn't even a top 30 contract in the league by AAV, so it shouldn't cripple a team's ability to spend. Second, with a cap system in place it will actually be advantageous to front load some mid tier contracts because too much long-term dead money on the books later could hurt more than big up-front dollars. You can't do this with every contract of course, but it's not inherently bad to do once or twice. Third, on the point of "building a team around him" I get what you're saying but I don't think that's the goal. I view him as a high end regular borderline All Star type of player. Roughly 20 million for one year of a guy like that is about the normal price. Fourth, I know this is going to sound laughable given who owns our team, but they don't *have* to stop spending when they hit the floor, and there's absolutely no way they hit the cap before the end of the 2027 when he'd be a free agent again anyway. To me the question is where do we find a catcher better than Ryan Jeffers for the 2027 season? I don't see one anywhere so I'd happily overpay him while avoiding any long-term commitment. 

    I'm not assuming there'll be a cap system in place, I'm saying it's maybe the only way the Twins significantly up payroll next year.

    "Highest paid catcher" matters because the QO being so much higher than any other catcher tells you it simply isn't smart (or at least no team has ever felt it was smart) to pay a catcher that much. Paying guys more than they are worth is not good resource management. Especially if you're a team with a limited budget. Catchers simply aren't worth that much. Not even peak JT Realmuto who was significantly better than Jeffers.

    We don't know what is or isn't advantageous for contracts in a hypothetical baseball cap/floor system until we know the rules that surround that system. 

    No, the normal price for a "high end regular borderline All Star type of" catcher is not 20 million. That matters. The cost for an All Star SS or CF is different than the cost of an All Star 1B or 3B which is different than the cost for an All Star C. His position matters.

    I don't follow the logic of "building a team around him" not being your goal and caring about finding a better catcher than Jeffers. If the team as a whole isn't the goal then why care about having a better catcher than Jeffers? If you aren't trying to build a winner, thus caring about the team around Jeffers, why care about overpaying for Jeffers just so you have the best catcher available to you?

    35 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    Every single contending team can fit Jeffers into their roster. Demand will be high and supply is quite low. Someone will bet on Jeffers hitting bombs for their team in October.

    That doesn't mean teams will just ignore what he's worth. There are always guys on the block that every single contending team can fit into their roster that don't get traded at the deadline. I have no doubt the Twins could trade Jeffers at the deadline. My doubt is that they get anything crazy back. They have no leverage now that he's hurt, with an injury that is known to hurt offensive numbers (especially power) even after it's healed, and he's a rental player. Will somebody want him? Absolutely. But at a certain cost.

    1 hour ago, amjgt said:

    I didn’t mention it in my first post, but a potential MLB payroll floor (and teams needing to spend) could play a part in this as well.

    This I think is the big unknown here, and makes me wary about saying definitively that any path is "best".

    Additionally I think Jeffers, assuming he comes back healthy and effective, is going to get a lot of interest this offseason simply because there are not really many proven position players who will be free agents. Jeffers looks like he will be a top 10, or maybe even a top 5, FA bat after the 2026 season.

    If teams have money to spend, either because of a new salary floor or because they are just looking to improve their offense by spending, there won't be many options. You could do a lot worse than Jeffers, a guy who can hit fairly well, can play a passable catcher, and won't be 30 until the middle of the 2027 season. So there might be enough of a market for Jeffers to the point where accepting the QO isn't a slam dunk for him.

    2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    I don’t know why people would assume a salary cap and floor would increase free agent spending. The level of total spend proposed by MLB is lower than the current overall spend. We will see the teams above the cap scrambling to dump contracts on the teams below the minimum. That will swallow up nearly all of the available dollars. The lockout will keep teams from spending until the last minute. Next season could be the worst year ever for MLB free agents.

    There is ZERO chance that any teams will be forced to dump contracts to get cap ceiling compliant. None. Zero. Zilch. 

    It just isn't going to happen.

    a) There's a 100% chance that if there's a cap there will be multiple years to get compliant (probably for the floor as well), and b) a 95+% chance that any existing contract gets some sort of grandfathering in, no matter how long it is. 

    5 minutes ago, amjgt said:

    There is ZERO chance that any teams will be forced to dump contracts to get cap ceiling compliant. None. Zero. Zilch. 

    It just isn't going to happen.

    a) There's a 100% chance that if there's a cap there will be multiple years to get compliant (probably for the floor as well), and b) a 95+% chance that any existing contract gets some sort of grandfathering in, no matter how long it is. 

    Then there is also zero chance they enforce the floor

    If the FO was serious they should have extended Jeffers last off-season.  I can't see them doing it now at the price.  Just too "un-Pohlad like."  

    The best case scenario is he hits just enough in the time he comes off the IL before the trade deadline that the Twins can extort a pretty good deal for him.  As to next season, I'm fine with bringing in someone like Stephenson or Heim if the price is right.  In 2028, the Twins will probably have Lackey and Tait.  That may be the best catching tandem they've had since 2006-Mauer & Redmond.  

    2027 will probably be a fractured season anyway and one the Twins don't contend in either, although with a healthy Lopez and if the young SP's continue to improve, good pitching is the ultimate equalizer.  Just look what the White Sox young pitching has done for them to date. 

    Another thought for 2027:  We've been getting a BARGAIN for Byron Buxton up to this point.  Once the Lockout/Strike is resolved and if there is indeed a cap and floor, I'd like to see Byron Buxton get a brand new deal that pays him something like $90 million for 3 seasons.  He's earned it.  

    25 minutes ago, TopGunn#22 said:

    If the FO was serious they should have extended Jeffers last off-season.  I can't see them doing it now at the price.  Just too "un-Pohlad like."  

    The best case scenario is he hits just enough in the time he comes off the IL before the trade deadline that the Twins can extort a pretty good deal for him.  As to next season, I'm fine with bringing in someone like Stephenson or Heim if the price is right.  In 2028, the Twins will probably have Lackey and Tait.  That may be the best catching tandem they've had since 2006-Mauer & Redmond.  

    2027 will probably be a fractured season anyway and one the Twins don't contend in either, although with a healthy Lopez and if the young SP's continue to improve, good pitching is the ultimate equalizer.  Just look what the White Sox young pitching has done for them to date. 

    Another thought for 2027:  We've been getting a BARGAIN for Byron Buxton up to this point.  Once the Lockout/Strike is resolved and if there is indeed a cap and floor, I'd like to see Byron Buxton get a brand new deal that pays him something like $90 million for 3 seasons.  He's earned it.  

    If the new CBA forces the Twins to spend they should absolutely not pay Buxton more than he makes them and they should absolutely not pay Jeffers $23 million. This is their chance to actually go get some players and compete. Spending more on guys than they're worth just to get cap compliant would be an awful result. If Buxton forces their hand, fine. But don't pay him just because. And based on his stance so far, I'd bet he'd be ok taking his 15 mil and being surrounded by better players. Wasting cap money would be a terrible way to start the new era of more competitive opportunity. 

    At first glance, it seems reasonable to think that whatever floor-like mechanism exists in the new CBA could make a QO to Jeffers a little more palatable to the Twins

    The problem is the chances of the new CBA being ratified before the deadline to make the offer are extremely slim

    I love Jeffers. I think he will be the top free agent at the position next year.

    And the answer is absolutely not. It shouldn't even be a consideration. When they signed Caratini... this conversation ended. 

    No Catcher is making 23 million a year. He absolutely might take it and simply become a free agent the following season where he can sign a similar deal with 23 million in cash in his pocket.   

    If he did take the QO... He probably would. Between Jeffers and Caratini... that would be 30 Million spent on the catcher position . Current payroll is 107 Million.  

    The Twins can't afford to allocate 25% of payroll on the catching position. No team can afford to allocate 25% to the catcher position. The Dodgers have Will Smith locked up until he is 57 Years old at about 15 Million per year with major league minimum 2nd catcher in Rushing. The Twins would be spending double what the free spending Dodgers are paying for the position. There will be nothing left for others.      

    Not to mention... if Jeffers takes it and I think he would. The 2027 Twins would not only have two catchers making a combined 30 Million dollars in 2027. They will have zero catchers in 2028 with both catcher deals expiring at the end of the season. Leading to ? What? in 2028.

    We all hope that 2028 is when Tait arrives at age 21 and becomes that immediate long term solution at the position. That might be a little quick.    

    The Twins have a budget. I don't know what that budget is but we all know they have a budget... and they have a budget no matter how many times Tom Pohlad says they will be aggressive if the opportunity arises. They will have a budget if they sell to Elon Musk. 

     

     

     

    Seems to me that he won’t be healthy enough by the deadline to be of high value (Teams will use this as a lever to offer less) - his ABS challenge ability is a small + on his defensive side. He WAS hitting great through the day he was injured. I see him maturing into a solid bat - ALAWAYS needed. He can DH to help get more AB’s through the year. 95 games behind the plate and 40-45 as DH.

    $41M for 3 years ……. that’s a VERY solid offer for his level of defense. Do it Next Week! …… if the answer is “no”, which it probably will be, tell him the offer will stand through December 15th. If he’s (his agent) still kicking the tires, it goes down $2M per week.

    Very fair to both sides.

    I would absolutely be in favor of extending Jeffers and I hope they do. But not for a $23M qualifying offer. I would think 6 years for 80-90M should work. He would be here throughout the rest of his prime and be able to help Tait or whoever the next catcher will be. 

    If he wont sign an extension before the deadline and if he's healthy, unfortunately the best route will probably be trading him. 

    The thing is, to my knowledge, there wont be a better catcher available as a free agent during the off-season. So I hope they try hard to get a deal done

    On 6/4/2026 at 12:42 PM, PDX Twin said:

    I'm betting on a long lockout. How does that affect the status of one-year deals such as the one proposed with the QO? Do we have to pay the full year if he only plays half? What if the whole year is canceled?

    There is a difference between a long lockout and missing games. There was a long lockout in the 2021-22 offseason, the second-longest stoppage in MLB history (1994), but it didn't cost any games. The season was delayed a week, but they made up to postponed games. 

    The current CBA ends on Dec. 1, so a lockout could start then. If like last time, there will be a flurry of signings before that date. 

    Hopefully there is enough institutional memory on both sides to get a deal done before games are canceled. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...