Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Are 30% Playoff Odds Enough for Twins to Buy at MLB Trade Deadline?

    With just six games remaining before the trade deadline, Minnesota has to decide whether the numbers or the bigger picture should determine its deadline strategy.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Jeffrey Becker-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The countdown to the trade deadline is officially on. With just six days remaining until the August 3 deadline, the Minnesota Twins are rapidly approaching the moment where they have to choose a direction. Are they buyers? Are they sellers? Or do they try to thread the needle somewhere in between?

    There is always a third path available. The Twins could trade from areas of depth to address areas of weakness, without fully committing to either side. They could move one of their left-handed hitters to acquire bullpen help or make another baseball trade that reallocates resources, rather than signaling a clear buy or sell. Those types of deals happen every deadline. But at its core, this deadline still comes down to one simple question: do the Twins believe enough in this team to invest in it? That is a much tougher question.

    After taking a series from the Athletics over the weekend, the Twins now sit at 53-54, with a 32.9% chance of reaching the postseason, according to FanGraphs. They trail the first-place White Sox by 3.0 games in the American League Central, while sitting just one game behind the final Wild Card spot. The challenge is that they aren't chasing just one team. Four other clubs are also within 3.5 games of that final playoff berth, making one of the tightest postseason races in baseball even more crowded.

    There are only six games remaining before the deadline. Unless the Twins catch fire and go 5-1 or collapse with a 1-5 stretch, they're likely heading into August 3 with playoff odds hovering right around 30%. That leaves the front office with one difficult decision: is a 30% chance at October baseball worth investing in?

    Looking strictly at the math, the answer probably isn't yes. After all, flipping those odds around tells an even bigger story. If the Twins have roughly a 30% chance of making the playoffs, they also have about a 70% chance of missing them. Asking the organization to trade away future assets for bullpen help or another rental player in hopes of beating those odds feels difficult to justify. But baseball decisions aren't made in a vacuum.

    It's impossible to separate this deadline from everything this organization and its fans have experienced over the past three years. The 2023 season represented the highest point of Twins baseball for an entire generation. Minnesota finally snapped its 18-game postseason losing streak, won its first playoff series in 21 years and looked like it was just scratching the surface on what's possible. Since then, almost everything that could go wrong has done so.

    The Twins slashed payroll; collapsed down the stretch in 2024 after carrying roughly a 95% chance of making the playoffs in September; conducted a trade-deadline fire sale; and the Pohlad family took the club off the market after months of uncertainty. Now, they're trying to avoid missing the postseason for a third consecutive year. It's been an exhausting stretch for a fanbase that finally believed brighter days were ahead.

    That's what makes this year's deadline so fascinating. Nobody expected much from the 2026 Twins entering the season, but here they are, entering the final week before the deadline with meaningful baseball still left to play. The numbers may say selling is the safest long-term decision, but is it the right decision for the franchise? Certainly not.

    Target Field is in the midst of its lowest-attended season ever, and another sell-off would almost guarantee another two months of meaningless baseball. Fans would spend August and September watching unfamiliar faces play in uncompetitive games, instead of watching a club trying to chase down a playoff spot.

    Buying, on the other hand, would send a completely different message. It would tell the clubhouse that the front office believes this team has earned the chance to compete. It would tell fans that ownership is finally willing to invest in a team that has exceeded expectations instead of immediately looking toward the future and instill hope into a team and fanbase that desperately needs it

    Maybe the Twins buy and still miss the playoffs. Maybe another contender catches fire the way Boston did with its 15-game winning streak and boxes Minnesota out of a Wild Card spot. That's entirely possible, and it may ultimately be the most likely outcome.

    But even then, the Twins would have spent the final two months of the season playing meaningful baseball. Fans would have had a reason to come to the ballpark. The front office would have shown belief in a clubhouse that has fought its way into contention, despite modest expectations. Tom Pohlad would have put his money where his mouth is by investing in a team that gave him every reason to do so. And the team could always get lucky in this winter's MLB Draft Lottery, too.

    These playoff odds create one of the toughest decisions a front office can face. They're too high to justify an obvious sell-off, but too low to comfortably sacrifice future assets. It's the definition of baseball's gray area. Should they trust the math? Or should they recognize where this franchise and its fanbase are today and decide that, after everything that's happened over the last three years, hope is worth betting on?


    What do you think the Twins should do at the trade deadline? Should they buy, sell, or try to walk the line somewhere in the middle? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Carson Tinney

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, C
    On Tuesday, Tinney went 2-for-5 with two home runs for Fort Myers. He hit a 2-run homer in the 3rd inning, and then he hit a 2-run walkoff homer in the bottom of the ninth!

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    6 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    Vikings training camp starts August 1. Lynx basketball playoff games start September 27. Everyone will be too busy talking football and basketball to pay attention to what the Twins are doing.

    The overlap between Twins fans and Lynx fans is tiny especially considering they have 12 fans to begin with...

    6 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Prielipp is at 91 innings pitched this year. I'd be absolutely floored if they let him go more than about 120ish to chase a playoff birth with a below .500 team. I don't know what the right answer is on inning jumps season to season, but teams tend to be pretty conservative with it. If their data says you can just let him rip for the whole season, do it. But if they have good reason to believe him throwing more than 120 (or whatever the number is) innings this year seriously increases the odds he gets injured late this year or next year, I really, really, really hope they don't push him for a team that can't even get above .500 by late July. 

    And to add that to my earlier comment about Ryan, I REALLY don't want them to risk Prielipp's arm in a season where your playoff rotation would be Bradley, a cooked Ryan, and Ober throwing 88 MPH backed up by an over extended Prielipp and unpredictable Rojas and Matthews. I get people want playoff baseball, but I'm not a fan of adding so much risk to future years for this team.

    If Ryan doesn't look, and perform, like his typical first half self tomorrow, I don't want them doing anything beyond trading a DeBarge type for a reliever. Unless they find a way to bring in Hancock. If they can get him, it'd change my view on other moves.

    So…. Base what we do off of what Ryan does in one start, unless we can get Hancock.. 

    3 minutes ago, Twinsrtheworst said:

    So…. Base what we do off of what Ryan does in one start, unless we can get Hancock.. 

    Yes. Well, that's what it was before Buxton left this game with his hip. If Ryan is cooked (so, not actually just one start, but him getting lit up in his last start, plus having this one pushed back nearly a full turn of the rotation, and his entire career showing he fades in the 2nd half already) and Buxton is hitting the IL, it would significantly change what I'd do.

    46 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Yes. Well, that's what it was before Buxton left this game with his hip. If Ryan is cooked (so, not actually just one start, but him getting lit up in his last start, plus having this one pushed back nearly a full turn of the rotation, and his entire career showing he fades in the 2nd half already) and Buxton is hitting the IL, it would significantly change what I'd do.

    Only confirmation of the right thing to do anyway friend.

    4 minutes ago, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Unless Tom Pohlad is trying to anger the fan base yet again, the answer is yes. 30% is enough. 

    Given the attendance numbers his sample size to irritate is at least pretty damn low!

    I feel they have a better than 30% chance of winning their division - no wild card needed. If they can add some pitching without losing any of the top prospects I think that would be great. Chemistry is important and that is evident that the present club has that going. Make a few additions that cost middle of the road prospects and see what happens.

    They are in such a strange place with contention vs selling this year.  500 in a very weak AL it makes sense to buy and go for it however the team has some major weaknesses that won't be patched over with fringy additions.

    Buxton and Ryan are the 2 most important players and both are questionable health wise for the stretch run, the pen (even bolstered) will top out at mediocre, the defense is bad, and the rotation is an injury away from disaster.

    I think they will add a couple mid tier relievers so they can say that they were buyers and supported this years team.  Jeffers is still likely to get sold and they will excuse that with impending free agency.  I think Ryan has tanked his value enough with the 6 homer game and arm fatigue break that he will not be moved until the off season.

    10 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Given the attendance numbers his sample size to irritate is at least pretty damn low!

    Well it is easy to irritate the irritable. And what I mean by that is it sounded to me during the offseason, fans were checked out before the season started anyway, Then those same checked out fans want the Twins to not make a postseason push. It seems like a central theme here…. Of don’t support the team and “the fans that support the team (such as myself) are the problem”, but also don’t try to win this year. Like a hamster wheel, round and round.

    10 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Only confirmation of the right thing to do anyway friend.

    According to….. fans that chose not to support the team before the season started? I wonder how many old timey  members would be upset by making the playoffs this year, 

    11 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Yes. Well, that's what it was before Buxton left this game with his hip. If Ryan is cooked (so, not actually just one start, but him getting lit up in his last start, plus having this one pushed back nearly a full turn of the rotation, and his entire career showing he fades in the 2nd half already) and Buxton is hitting the IL, it would significantly change what I'd do.

    I don’t believe Ryan is cooked,  If he is “cooked” like you seem to hope he is, nobody is trading for him anyways.. What makes you think that? So to clarify, if he goes 6 innings of 1 run ball. Are you saying it’s ok to try and win the division or is Buxton the new caveat in this? I’m trying to keep up with this thought process, It seems to be morphing, maybe I could understand it better.

    According to Zoll the answer is yes so here we go. I will be interested to watch it unfold as there are many different versions of buying. My fervent wish is that no prospect with potential is given up for a rental. If the trade solves a problem for multiple years that’s ok. This is not the path I would have chosen but I’ve posted my feelings on this numerous times so now I will sit back and hope for some shrewd additions. 

    43 minutes ago, Twinsrtheworst said:

    Well it is easy to irritate the irritable. And what I mean by that is it sounded to me during the offseason, fans were checked out before the season started anyway, Then those same checked out fans want the Twins to not make a postseason push. It seems like a central theme here…. Of don’t support the team and “the fans that support the team (such as myself) are the problem”, but also don’t try to win this year. Like a hamster wheel, round and round.

    I'm glad you're enjoying the season.  I don't think the best interests of the team are to waste potential trade assets on a low upside season.  That's just where we differ.

    13 hours ago, Craig Arko said:

    How many .300 hitters are there this year? Most players would be pretty happy with 30%.

    I was thinking this exact same thing. I was going to use on base percentage but batting average will make the same point. 

    30% odds was created by someone and it doesn't mean that someone is right. 

    We are currently a half game behind the final wild card spot and 2 games behind the AL Central leader!

    There is an old saying that I love about Baseball. Every team is going to win 54 games and every team is going to lose 54 games. It's the other 54 games that matter. 

    . Here we are on July 29... 54 Wins and 54 Losses. Let's get to those games that matter. 

     

    16 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I'm glad you're enjoying the season.  I don't think the best interests of the team are to waste potential trade assets on a low upside season.  That's just where we differ.

    Last night's walkoff must have been so devastatingly disappointing for you. Try to keep a stiff upper lip.

    10 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I was thinking this exact same thing. I was going to use on base percentage but batting average will make the same point. 

    30% odds was created by someone and it doesn't mean that someone is right. 

    We are currently a half game behind the final wild card spot and 2 games behind the AL Central leader!

    There is an old saying that I love about Baseball. Every team is going to win 54 games and every team is going to lose 54 games. It's the other 54 games that matter. 

    . Here we are on July 29... 54 Wins and 54 Losses. Let's get to those games that matter. 

     

    You are correct sir. The correct odds may be 27% 😀. I do like the 54/54/54 analogy - as Herbie famously said “now let’s go out there and take it”. 

    13 minutes ago, Twinsrtheworst said:

    I don’t believe Ryan is cooked,  If he is “cooked” like you seem to hope he is, nobody is trading for him anyways.. What makes you think that? So to clarify, if he goes 6 innings of 1 run ball. Are you saying it’s ok to try and win the division or is Buxton the new caveat in this? I’m trying to keep up with this thought process, It seems to be morphing, maybe I could understand it better.

    Who said I hoped Ryan is cooked? I'd put my money on him being cooked for the rest of this season before I put it on him being a 3.38 ERA pitcher the rest of the year. But that doesn't mean I want him to go from a 3.17 ERA pitcher to a 4.93 ERA pitcher. Those aren't random numbers, by the way. Those are his ERA pre and post All Star break for his career. I'm off the trade Ryan thing now, because I don't think they could get as much value as I'd like because he's reinforced that he's likely to fade in the 2nd half again. Like he has done literally every season of his career. 6 innings of 1 run ball would be encouraging, but it also depends how he gets there and how it looks. I want Ryan to be good. You seem to be confusing making a prediction based on 4+ years of data with me hoping for something. I hope he never gives up a run again in his life, but that wouldn't be a very good prediction on what he'll actually do.

    It's ok to try to win the division no matter what I think about who they should trade away, trade for, sign, cut, demote, promote, anything. And it's ok for you to want them to do different moves than I want them to do. Buxton isn't a new caveat, but it's another data point to consider. That's what every decision they make should be about. Data points (some human provided, like by scouts) telling them what the likely outcomes of things are and how certain decisions are likely to affect things. If Buxton goes on the IL and is likely out for 2 to 4 weeks (random numbers, I don't know his actual situation) and Ryan is a mid-4 ERA pitcher, or on the IL because the arm fatigue is actually something more (like in 2023 when he hid his injury), do you think the Twins are likely to succeed the rest of the way? Or do you think it'd hurt their chances to have their "ace" and superstar out? Do you think they should ignore those things or factor them in when they make decisions?

    Nothing is morphing. My stance has been the same all season. This team isn't good enough. I'm glad people are excited about them being .500. That doesn't do it for me. They're struggling to beat 2 teams with 45 wins. They're struggling to score runs against the 28th and 29th "best" pitching staffs in baseball. Outside of the As defense handing them half a dozen runs the other night, the Twins have scored 5 runs in 3 games against teams with 4.84 and 5.35 ERAs. Many of us pointed out the unsustainability of their offense performing so much better with RISP than they do the rest of the time. Welcome to the return to the mean.

    I hope the Twins win every game. I don't expect them to. I won't be upset if they trade prospects like Kyle DeBarge for a rental reliever. Trade DeBarge, Amick, and Rosario for 3 different relievers. I will be upset if they trade somebody like Riley Quick for a rental starter. If Buxton goes on the IL and they can't beat the Royals with Joe Ryan on the mound, yes, I think that should play a factor in the moves they make between now and 5 PM central on August 3. I'd trade Jeffers no matter what. Don't think anyone is crazy for not wanting that. But it's what I'd do if I were in charge. Won't be mad if they keep him, and I hope he OPSes 1.000 if they do. Don't want them to lose games in order to convince them to trade him. Think they should've decided that already. But it's what I'd like to see them do.

    20 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Last night's walkoff must have been so devastatingly disappointing for you. Try to keep a stiff upper lip.

    I thoroughly enjoyed it. And I still want them to trade Ryan Jeffers and not give up any meaningful prospect for a team that's been at .500 for 2 of the last 84 games.

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I thoroughly enjoyed it. And I still want them to trade Ryan Jeffers and not give up any meaningful prospect for a team that's been at .500 for 2 of the last 84 games.

    Glad you are enjoying the Twins, I believe we had some back and forth during the offseason and you had vowed to not spend a dime on the team or to watch a game until the Twins were sold. Glad you are back. We are actually playing and winning at around a .560 clip since June 1. That’s not everything… but it’s something. Are they overachieving? Probably, but many years the team to come out of the AL is a team of overachievers. 

    4 minutes ago, Twinsrtheworst said:

    Glad you are enjoying the Twins, I believe we had some back and forth during the offseason and you had vowed to not spend a dime on the team or to watch a game until the Twins were sold. Glad you are back. We are actually playing and winning at around a .560 clip since June 1. That’s not everything… but it’s something. Are they overachieving? Probably, but many years the team to come out of the AL is a team of overachievers. 

    I vowed to not spend a dime on the team until they've proven to me that they're going to invest in it. And I haven't spent a dime on the team. I never said I wouldn't watch. Just that I won't pay for it. I always hope they do well. I just know that decisions you make now affect what happens in the future. And the way I balance those things seems different from you and others. And that's alright.

    14 hours ago, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Unless Tom Pohlad is trying to anger the fan base yet again, the answer is yes. 30% is enough. 

    He is going to anger a given percentage no matter what he does.  It seems to me there is a pretty equal number of people that are focused on this year and another fairly equal group of people who are more focused on building a true contender.    I fall into the group that wants to manage toward something better than mediocrity and hope for a miracle in the playoffs.

    15 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Yes. Well, that's what it was before Buxton left this game with his hip. If Ryan is cooked (so, not actually just one start, but him getting lit up in his last start, plus having this one pushed back nearly a full turn of the rotation, and his entire career showing he fades in the 2nd half already) and Buxton is hitting the IL, it would significantly change what I'd do.

    So, what you are saying is that before you made an important decision about the deadline, you would take into account if the team lost their best position player and their best Pitcher.  When you wrote it, I thought well of course.  I can't believe you have to defend this position.    

    Since it looks pretty clear right now that they're not going to sell regardless of whether or not they should, I'm going to focus just on the buying part until they give me a reason to think otherwise

    No matter what you think their chances are this, I think just about everyone would agree that their current setup gives them potentially better chances in the future.  Because of that, I hope they focus on pieces that have control beyond this season.   So I'd prefer they swing bigger deals for Detmers-type pitchers (maybe not him specifically) over rentals.  That way they can help improve their playoff push this year while also kickstarting their push towards a more competitive window next year.  It's not that trading away Ricardo Olivares (or whomever) for some expiring reliever no one's heard of from the Giants compromises their ability to improve the team in the future; it's that using Olivares as part of a broader package for more controllable pitching either now or in the offseason is a better use of those finite trade resources.

    If they're intent on buying, do so in ways that provide benefit beyond 2026

    38 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I'm unsure what I really want. If Buxton is out, I didn't think this team is all that good. Part of me says if you are buying, BUY and really try. Part of me says to deal ok prospects. 

    I've flip flipped a lot the last week. 

    I've been more on the wait to see how this team does side of things. I agree completely with your thought, no half measures, if the team is good enough to be a buyer, get a couple of difference makers, not fringe players. One other thought for me is I'd rather see them go after a SP & move Prielipp to the bullpen than overpay for a reliever.

    If management is just going to add fringe players then they might as well trade Jeffers & Ryan.

    Tom said no half measures, let's see if he keeps his word.

     

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    He is going to anger a given percentage no matter what he does.  It seems to me there is a pretty equal number of people that are focused on this year and another fairly equal group of people who are more focused on building a true contender.    I fall into the group that wants to manage toward something better than mediocrity and hope for a miracle in the playoffs.

    Something better is possible with some of the current players. Im not going to pretend for a second that the owners are not billionaires. They can absolutely afford to put a winning team on the field around the current stars and prospects. Its their jobs as owners to do that. Selling off our best players isn't managing towards something better. All it does is keep pushing the goalpost forward and out of reach.

    Selling off Jeffers for possibly a fringe top 100 prospect isn't going to help more than keeping him, giving him a QO and taking the compensation pick if he declines. 

    Selling off Ryan just means we need find multiple pitchers like Ryan instead of the 1 we are currently missing. 

    "Managing towards something better" should include keeping our stars in MN. 

    It sounds like there's a good chance of a salary floor in the new CBA. If the stated number is anything close to what happens, this team will need to spend near 70M this off-season. Keeping our stars and adding to that core should be easily done with that size payroll. 

    3 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    So, what you are saying is that before you made an important decision about the deadline, you would take into account if the team lost their best position player and their best Pitcher.  When you wrote it, I thought well of course.  I can't believe you have to defend this position.    

    Who said they lost there best position player and best pitcher? I read Buxton is day to day and well Ryan pitches tonight. Who are the best players we lost you reference.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...