Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    3 Roster Moves the Twins Need to Make Right Now

    Three internal roster moves could provide a much-needed spark for a Twins offense that has gone quiet at the worst possible time.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Rob Thompson (photo of Matt Wallner)

    Twins Video

    The trade deadline has come and gone, and the Minnesota Twins have officially turned the page toward the final two months of the regular season. Jeremy Zoll added multiple pieces at the deadline, all of the new acquisitions are now on the active roster, and the focus shifts to making a run at a postseason berth.

    But just because the deadline has passed doesn't mean the Twins are done improving their roster. Some of the biggest upgrades available are already in the organization. With every game becoming more important, Minnesota can't afford to let roster spots go to players who aren't contributing while impact talent waits in St. Paul. If the Twins want to put themselves in the best position possible for the stretch run, there are three moves they should make immediately.

    1. Option Tristan Gray to Triple-A St. Paul and promote Kaelen Culpepper.
    Gray being called up when Byron Buxton landed on the injured list was a curious decision from the beginning, and it has only become more confusing over the last week. Since joining the Twins on July 29, Gray has received just two plate appearances, going 0-for-2 with two strikeouts. The lack of playing time says everything. The Twins simply don't trust him enough to put him in the lineup, meaning they've essentially been playing with one fewer roster spot.

    Instead of carrying a player who isn't going to play, the Twins should hand that opportunity to Kaelen Culpepper.

    The organization's top shortstop prospect has battled injuries throughout the season, but he has looked healthy since returning and continues to produce. Culpepper owns an .826 OPS at Triple-A this season and reminded everyone what he's capable of by going 3-for-5 with a triple on Tuesday night. He's a right-handed hitter, something Minnesota desperately needs, and he brings considerably more upside than Gray.

    Giving Culpepper regular opportunities at shortstop while Ryan Kreidler fills a reserve role would make the Twins younger, more athletic and with greater offensive upside. At some point, the organization has to find out what it has in one of its top prospects, and there may not be a better opportunity than right now.

    2. Designate Alex Jackson for assignment and recall Matt Wallner from Triple-A
    Carrying three catchers over the last month made perfect sense before the trade deadline. Ryan Jeffers was one of the biggest trade candidates on the roster, and keeping Jackson around gave the Twins insurance in case they decided to move Jeffers. They didn't end up moving him, however.

    Now that Jeffers is still in Minnesota, there isn't much reason to continue carrying three catchers. Jeffers and Victor Caratini form one of the better catching duos in baseball, and that extra roster spot could be much better utilized elsewhere.

    To Jackson's credit, he has been a pleasant surprise during his time with the Twins. Still, with a $1.35 million contract, there's a reasonable chance he could clear waivers and remain in the organization if another club isn't interested.

    Replacing him with Matt Wallner would immediately make the Twins' lineup more dangerous.

    Wallner's demotion in May was justified after his slow start to the season, but he has done everything the organization could have asked of him since arriving in St. Paul. He owns a .938 OPS with 20 home runs since being sent down, and he added another homer Tuesday night. He has forced his way back into the conversation.

    The Twins have been searching for offensive consistency for weeks, and Wallner's power gives them another legitimate threat in the middle of the lineup. That is simply more valuable than carrying a third catcher who has no clear role.

    3. Option Alan Roden to Triple-A and select the contract of Walker Jenkins
    When the Twins promoted Alan Roden in early July, the move was easy to understand. He was swinging the bat well at Triple-A, was healthy and deserved an opportunity to prove himself in the majors.

    Unfortunately, it hasn't happened.

    Roden has produced just a .514 OPS with no extra-base hits over his first 50 plate appearances with Minnesota. The Twins have also made it clear they aren't comfortable playing him in center field, limiting his versatility even further. Between his lack of production and limited defensive role, Roden simply hasn't established himself as someone who needs to remain on the roster.

    That opportunity should now belong to Walker Jenkins.

    Jenkins is one of the top prospects in baseball for a reason. He has posted an .818 OPS in Triple-A this season and has looked even better since returning from injury at the end of June. More importantly, he passes the eye test every time he steps on the field. He looks like a player who is ready for the next challenge.

    With Buxton sidelined, there are plenty of at-bats available. Jenkins can play either corner outfield spot and is capable of handling center field as well, giving manager Derek Shelton another athletic option while adding one of the organization's highest-upside bats. At some point, prospects stop benefiting from Triple-A and start benefiting from major league experience. Jenkins appears to have reached that point.

    The Twins have struggled to score runs over the last few weeks, and waiting around for the offense to suddenly improve isn't much of a strategy. The front office already addressed external needs before the deadline. Now it's time to maximize the talent that's already in the organization.

    Calling up Culpepper, Wallner and Jenkins would inject youth, upside and offensive potential into a lineup that desperately needs a spark. If the Twins are serious about making a run over the final two months, these are the kinds of aggressive roster decisions they should be making now instead of waiting until it's too late.

    What do you think? Are these the three roster moves the Twins should make immediately, or would you go in a different direction as they begin their postseason push? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Kaelen Culpepper

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, SS
    Culpepper was one of four Saints batters with three hits on Tuesday night in the team's 15-5 win over Louisville. He was 3-for-4 with a walk and his second triple.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    There you go. The Twins chose a path, they are trying to compete for the division title or a wild card spot in the 2026 and 2027 seasons. Many of us would have chosen a different path but that's the one they chose. Now make decisions based on that choice. Nothing is more of a "half measure" than choosing a lane and then not making moves that might make that lane successful. So let's quit worrying about what might happen if there is a substantial work stoppage in 2027. Let's not fear the risk of loss; let's focus on the possibility of gain. 

    The only place you and I differ is that I think calling up Culpepper and maybe Jenkins could provide a spark and might help this team. It seems like you are a little less hopeful that will occur. Hey, you might be right; I certainly don't know enough to accurately predict what will happen. Having said that, I would call up Culpepper and Jenkins on 8/15, assuming they both continue to hit in AAA for the next 10 days, in place of Gray and Roden unless he all of a sudden one of them gets hot. If one of them does, then Jenkins comes up for the other. Keep Jackson for now, and his spot can be the spot you use to get Buxton on the roster. Buxton can join the roster for Gray if he's available before 8/15, but everything I read suggest he's going to be out at least two or three more weeks. All of this assumes that nobody else gets injured which is usually what happens to open up a spot. Let's all stop the handwringing and make some moves to see if this lane actually works. If it doesn't, at least we tried to make something happen rather than sitting around in limbo which is our usual state.

    I won't be upset if they call them up. I don't think they're any sort of saviors at this point. I'd give Jenkins the better odds there than Culpepper. He hasn't looked great in the couple games I've watched him since he's returned (granted, super small sample size). 

    I'm on the 8/15 train. All for calling them both up that day. Especially because I don't expect Kreidler or Roden to suddenly pick it up. Buxton is the X factor here. If he's back and Bell is hitting a little, they aren't going to put Jenkins in the OF to move Bell, Larnach, or Keaschall to the bench. Culpepper replacing Kreidler is a much more straight forward move. Or Jenkins replacing Roden if Buxton isn't back.

    But I don't expect either to be some sort of savior from the jump. And them providing a spark or boost in energy is a nice though, but that's what the additions at the deadline were supposed to be. Hoffman was supposed to walk in and the guys were all supposed to go "we're in it now, boys! Strap in tight because we're going for a ride!" Didn't exactly have that effect yesterday. If they need rookies to provide a secondary boost 2 days after the deadline, I'm not sure I really buy this boost or spark hypothesis.

    32 minutes ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    Hamstringing from what.  Where is he holding us back.  Who are you calling up that is going to drastically make a difference in 15-20 at bats a month.  Jackson is a valuable asset in that he doesn't need constant reps because he isn't a young prospect and can still perform.  Granted I would have rather Jeffers not gotten injured and him to be called up after we were able to sneak him through waivers once.  The difference is at the beginning of the season there wasn't a big demand for legit catching options.  Right now there is still excess demand for catching.  

    The cost to find someone equivalent is $3 -$7 million dollars on the free agent market or trade a top 20 prospect in the offseason.   Those are the options. We traded a 25-30th prospect this year for him, and he has now shown positive WAR in consecutive seasons.     

    From having a functional bench. I like Jackson fine, but he also will cost $3-4 million in arbitration next year. So replacing him with a free-agent back-up catcher is likely a wash. 

    48 minutes ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    And as discussed Genao was already on their 40 man.   I really question whether people on this board even understand the potential implications.  

    Prospects not currently on the 40 man,  if they are added and get a cup of coffee they will be unable to work with coaches in the offseason or play in the minor leagues next year if there is a lockout.   So players who have played a full season don't apply,  international prospects who were already on the 40 man don't apply.   

    I am not saying we can't just say those risks are overblown, the players can work on their own in the offseason and the new CBA will likely get signed so have a mid to late April start date.   However you just can't ignore this issue either.  

    I completely understand the consequences, my point was other teams called up up guys that are 21 and in a similar or same situation as the twins with 40 man spots and the upcoming lock out (when others said that doesn't happen) Doesn't matter if that was May, June, July, or August the outcome is the same no? Minus the rookie status and  I personally wouldn't call either up right now and blow their rookie status. But I would call them up the day that doesn't affect that. 

    As for the risk of the CBA (which I agree is real) doesn't that have to be weighed against the risk of not knowing what they have and are forced to sign the next round of Bell, Gallo, Bader, France, Santana and on an on? 

    The Twins seem to go into every year with unknowns at many positions, which requires them to sign older not so great players to cover those spots because they don't seem to give them a chance until it is the last resort.  

    Is there one fielder that locked down a spot for this team in the last few years (minus the injured Buxton) or has it been shuffling the deck chairs with the same basic people with similar results? 

    3 minutes ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    I completely understand the consequences, my point was other teams called up up guys that are 21 and in a similar or same situation as the twins with 40 man spots and the upcoming lock out (when others said that doesn't happen) Doesn't matter if that was May, June, July, or August the outcome is the same no? Minus the rookie status and  I personally wouldn't call either up right now and blow their rookie status. But I would call them up the day that doesn't affect that. 

    As for the risk of the CBA (which I agree is real) doesn't that have to be weighed against the risk of not knowing what they have and are forced to sign the next round of Bell, Gallo, Bader, France, Santana and on an on? 

    The Twins seem to go into every year with unknowns at many positions, which requires them to sign older not so great players to cover those spots because they don't seem to give them a chance until it is the last resort.  

    Is there one fielder that locked down a spot for this team in the last few years (minus the injured Buxton) or has it been shuffling the deck chairs with the same basic people with similar results? 

    This is a good point as well. I think we all expect Jenkins and Culpepper to be on the opening day  2027 roster and in the starting line-up. It would be nice to have seen them against ML pitching for a bit beforehand. 

    22 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    There you go. The Twins chose a path, they are trying to compete for the division title or a wild card spot in the 2026 and 2027 seasons. Many of us would have chosen a different path but that's the one they chose. Now make decisions based on that choice. Nothing is more of a "half measure" than choosing a lane and then not making moves that might make that lane successful. So let's quit worrying about what might happen if there is a substantial work stoppage in 2027. Let's not fear the risk of loss; let's focus on the possibility of gain. 

    The only place you and I differ is that I think calling up Culpepper and maybe Jenkins could provide a spark and might help this team. It seems like you are a little less hopeful that will occur. Hey, you might be right; I certainly don't know enough to accurately predict what will happen. Having said that, I would call up Culpepper and Jenkins on 8/15, assuming they both continue to hit in AAA for the next 10 days, in place of Gray and Roden unless he all of a sudden one of them gets hot. If one of them does, then Jenkins comes up for the other. Keep Jackson for now, and his spot can be the spot you use to get Buxton on the roster. Buxton can join the roster for Gray if he's available before 8/15, but everything I read suggest he's going to be out at least two or three more weeks. All of this assumes that nobody else gets injured which is usually what happens to open up a spot. Let's all stop the handwringing and make some moves to see if this lane actually works. If it doesn't, at least we tried to make something happen rather than sitting around in limbo which is our usual state.

    What's the significance of waiting until 8/15? They could be 6 games under .500 by then at the rate things are going.

    5 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    From having a functional bench. I like Jackson fine, but he also will cost $3-4 million in arbitration next year. So replacing him with a free-agent back-up catcher is likely a wash. 

    What bench function are they missing by having him? 3 catchers are absolutely not ideal, but what could the Twins be doing differently with a different bench piece?

    To stick to the moves suggested here, are these reasonable lineups?
    Vs RHP
    Larnach- LF
    Jeffers- C
    Bell- DH
    Clemens- 2B
    Lewis- 1B
    Lee- 3B
    Keaschall- RF
    Jenkins- CF
    Culpepper- SS
    Bench- Wallner, Martin, Caratini, Kreidler

    Vs LHP
    Martin- LF
    Jeffers- C
    Lewis- 1B
    Bell- DH
    Clemens- 2B
    Keaschall- RF
    Lee- 3B
    Jenkins- CF
    Culpepper- SS
    Bench- Wallner, Larnach, Caratini, Kreidler

    Those are their current most used lineups against righties and lefties with Jenkins and Culpepper added.

    What regular moves are they making with that team instead of having Jackson for Wallner? How often are you benching Bell, Jenkins, Larnach, or Keaschall for Wallner? When is Wallner playing? This assumes you don't plan on having Jenkins be a platoon player. But, even if you did, Wallner isn't playing against lefties, Kreidler is.

    What is Jackson really stopping them from doing? Again, 3 catchers is not at all ideal. But what is he stopping that is so bad they should just DFA him and essentially guarantee he's claimed?

    6 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    What bench function are they missing by having him? 3 catchers are absolutely not ideal, but what could the Twins be doing differently with a different bench piece?

    To stick to the moves suggested here, are these reasonable lineups?
    Vs RHP
    Larnach- LF
    Jeffers- C
    Bell- DH
    Clemens- 2B
    Lewis- 1B
    Lee- 3B
    Keaschall- RF
    Jenkins- CF
    Culpepper- SS
    Bench- Wallner, Martin, Caratini, Kreidler

    Vs LHP
    Martin- LF
    Jeffers- C
    Lewis- 1B
    Bell- DH
    Clemens- 2B
    Keaschall- RF
    Lee- 3B
    Jenkins- CF
    Culpepper- SS
    Bench- Wallner, Larnach, Caratini, Kreidler

    Those are their current most used lineups against righties and lefties with Jenkins and Culpepper added.

    What regular moves are they making with that team instead of having Jackson for Wallner? How often are you benching Bell, Jenkins, Larnach, or Keaschall for Wallner? When is Wallner playing? This assumes you don't plan on having Jenkins be a platoon player. But, even if you did, Wallner isn't playing against lefties, Kreidler is.

    What is Jackson really stopping them from doing? Again, 3 catchers is not at all ideal. But what is he stopping that is so bad they should just DFA him and essentially guarantee he's claimed?

    Once Buxtion is back, I'd like the line-up to be:

    -Buxton CF

    -Keashall RF

    -Larnach DH

    -Jeffers C

    -Clemons 2B

    -Lewis 1B

    -Lee 3B

    -Jenkins LF

    -Culpepper SS

     

    Bench: Kriedler, Martin, Caratini, Bell. 

     

     

    2 hours ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I could say you are narrowly focused on this year for a game or two, and not next years team.  My entire premise of the trade deadline is this isn't a good enough team period to buy with.    If you want to cheaply do it fine - I wouldn't call what we did at the deadline cheap.   Although we only gave up 1 high upside arm - and 1 high ceiling/low floor international prospect.   

    The issue is you have a short term horizon view and thats why you have the philosophy on dropping Jackson - and bringing up Jenkins and Culpepper.   There are downsides though.  What happens if Jeffers or Caratini gets hurt.  Who are you filling in his spot with?  We have no one else at the level of Jackson.  The issue with Jenkins and Culpepper is if there is a long lockout that can't continue to work out at the facilities or play in the minor league system until its resolved.   I don't know what the right answer but I do have concerns and My horizon goes out further than the next month or two like you.    

    I am looking at both this year and the future.  There are always catchers available that can be signed to be the backup for this year if needed and during the offseason if Jackson is claimed.  He is not that irreplaceable.

    The Twins are saying they are contenders, it that is so you bring somebody up that might help you win that game or two as that may make the difference in the playoffs or not.  They need to backup their talk with actions.

    Bringing up Jenkins and Culpepper can help this year and also starts the learning curve for them this year instead of next year.  Other teams are not concerned about the potential lockout why are the Twins.

    2 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    Once Buxtion is back, I'd like the line-up to be:

    -Buxton CF

    -Keashall RF

    -Larnach DH

    -Jeffers C

    -Clemons 2B

    -Lewis 1B

    -Lee 3B

    -Jenkins LF

    -Culpepper SS

     

    Bench: Kriedler, Martin, Caratini, Bell. 

     

     

    When is Martin playing in this scenario? Assuming you aren't platooning Jenkins, Bell DHs for Larnach against lefties and Kreidler plays 2B for Clemens. Pinch running is a thought, but the sprint speed for Martin is 27.8 f/s (60th percentile) while the sprint speed for Jackson is 27.7 f/s (58th percentile). Martin would never be a defensive replacement. 

    Are you ready to lose Jackson for .1 f/s sprint speed? I just don't think Jackson is actually blocking anything meaningful.

    1 hour ago, jorgenswest said:

    Using slash stats in a sample short of beyond a full season to predict future slash stats is unwise. Roden has solid contact numbers. He has an above average xwOBA behind only Jeffers, Larnach and Buxton. It his 50 plate appearances he is taking good at bats and striking the ball well. Everything points to the next 50 being better.

    You are forgetting about his stint with Toronto last year at the beginning of the season.  He was horrible and was sent down.  He may have missed his window, he is going to be 27 before next season, he is aging out of prospect territory.

    1 hour ago, TJSweens said:

    Culpepper for Gray should be done immediately. Culpepper looks ready and Gray is as worthless as goose s*** on a pump handle. 

    Since that frees Kreidler up to play CF, I would wait on Jenkins. Walker looks like he has a few things to iron out yet.

    I can't get excited about the idea of Wallner coming back. As has been pointed out already, Wallner has a serious hole in his swing. Major league pitching exploits it in way that AAA pitchers cant.

    Kriedler is not a CF and can not hit enough.  You would hold back Jenkins for Kriedler that makes no sense.

    5 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    I am looking at both this year and the future.  There are always catchers available that can be signed to be the backup for this year if needed and during the offseason if Jackson is claimed.  He is not that irreplaceable.

    The Twins are saying they are contenders, it that is so you bring somebody up that might help you win that game or two as that may make the difference in the playoffs or not.  They need to backup their talk with actions.

    Bringing up Jenkins and Culpepper can help this year and also starts the learning curve for them this year instead of next year.  Other teams are not concerned about the potential lockout why are the Twins.

    What is Jackson actually blocking? What are the lineups and bench situations you'd like to see, and when is everybody playing?

    There aren't catchers available right now. It's why Ben Rordvedt returned an arm with MLB time under his belt already. If they were going to lose Jackson, they needed to trade him. Losing him for nothing 2 days later is awful roster management.

    But my real question is, what is he actually blocking? I assume you aren't hoping Jenkins or Culpepper are platooned, so they're everyday guys. What is the bench role that Jackson is blocking?

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    Emma has to spend 90 days on the active roster to eliminate the 4th option year. 
    3/9-5/5 = 57 days
    7/28-8/30 = 33 days = 90 total

    He's not getting a 4th option unless he goes back on the 60 day IL soon.

    He is still on rehab, so he is not on the active roster yet.

    1 hour ago, DJL44 said:

    Having Jackson on the roster lets them pinch hit with Jeffers or Caratini every single game. They should be using that roster move more often.

    Caratini has fallen off the cliff hitting and is not a viable pinch hitter, so that option should be taken off the table.

    3 hours ago, laloesch said:

    That's why they haven't been promoted yet.  I can understand the Twins perspective on that, but still it's frustrating.  And to be completely fair both Culpepper and Jenkins have missed significant time this season.  I think the Twins don't start the clock on either one of them this season which stinks because us fans want to see them.

    Someone asked me whether this is true about service time.  I have just seen this idea posted here and presumed it’s true.  
    I have not looked at the rules myself (that would be a real snoozer!). 

    37 minutes ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    I completely understand the consequences, my point was other teams called up up guys that are 21 and in a similar or same situation as the twins with 40 man spots and the upcoming lock out (when others said that doesn't happen) Doesn't matter if that was May, June, July, or August the outcome is the same no? Minus the rookie status and  I personally wouldn't call either up right now and blow their rookie status. But I would call them up the day that doesn't affect that. 

    As for the risk of the CBA (which I agree is real) doesn't that have to be weighed against the risk of not knowing what they have and are forced to sign the next round of Bell, Gallo, Bader, France, Santana and on an on? 

    The Twins seem to go into every year with unknowns at many positions, which requires them to sign older not so great players to cover those spots because they don't seem to give them a chance until it is the last resort.  

    Is there one fielder that locked down a spot for this team in the last few years (minus the injured Buxton) or has it been shuffling the deck chairs with the same basic people with similar results? 

    That Correa dude.. guess a locked down spot is reserved for the big stars.

    54 minutes ago, 1985Fan said:

    1.) It doesn’t look like KC is fully recovered from injury. 2.) As I’ve already stated, I don’t think it’s a good idea to throw a rookie into a starting role in a playoff chase. I think that’s too much pressure on a young player to perform AND spark the offense. 
    I’ll look for KC and Jenkins if the wheels fall off the playoff chase or next year. The offense should come around if the pitching doesn’t immediately put them behind in every game. 

    Two doubles today and a triple last night with 4 runs scored and 2 RBI's doesn't sound like he is still recovering.

    2 minutes ago, Patzky said:

    Still no lineup posted and the Royals have had theirs up for hours .. hoping praying refreshing..

    Does this mean you're hoping and praying for these moves today? The Saints are playing as we speak and Culpepper and Jenkins are both playing. These moves aren't happening today.

    17 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    What is Jackson actually blocking? What are the lineups and bench situations you'd like to see, and when is everybody playing?

    There aren't catchers available right now. It's why Ben Rordvedt returned an arm with MLB time under his belt already. If they were going to lose Jackson, they needed to trade him. Losing him for nothing 2 days later is awful roster management.

    But my real question is, what is he actually blocking? I assume you aren't hoping Jenkins or Culpepper are platooned, so they're everyday guys. What is the bench role that Jackson is blocking?

    He has no role, that's the point.  They are trying to force him in at 1B which weakens everything.  I'd rather have someone up that would just be a pinch runner and defense type role if that's the way they are going.  They are pinch hitting Caratini for someone most games and then playing musical chairs with the defense which is weakening the defense in the later innings.  Every player doesn't have to play 7 days a week.  You can have 4 outfielders that all could play 5 to 6 days a week, with the forth outfielder maybe playing 4 days a week.

    This is why the goal should be quality, quit worrying about what side plate they hit from.  By rotating, you also strengthen your bench with better options to pinch hit when needed.

    6 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Does this mean you're hoping and praying for these moves today? The Saints are playing as we speak and Culpepper and Jenkins are both playing. These moves aren't happening today.

    But Wallner isn't in the lineup, maybe the Twins call him up in hopes the Twins can score a run against Cameron? </s>

    I'm good with keeping Wallner at AAA. The other 2 I fully agree with.

    And frankly, I know he doesn't play a lot, but I'm ok with keeping Jackson around a bit longer as emergency too in case Jeffers or Caratini do get hurt. I don't love the catching depth at AAA. I designate Jackson if everyone else is healthy and Buxton is actually good to go. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...