Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    38
  • comments
    474
  • views
    94,347

Is the Twins' sausage magical?


Twins Video

Is Twins' sausage magical? Short answer, No. So why the Twins' turnaround? Let's look at what led up to the winning streak.

Shortly after the '23 season, Falvey credited the "all or nothing" approach for the team's success. BTW it has been the Twins' hitting approach since '19. During the off-season, Baldelli was questioned about their hitters' SO record. He responded with "SOs are not important and they weren't changing anything". Spring training, "all or nothing" was implemented again with poor results. Twins started '24 with 2 wins against a promising KC team, Lewis's injury, later followed by Correa's. Without Lewis & Correa (archetype to Twins hitting philosophy & best hitters) & the league adjusting; the losses & SOs started to pile up w/o the HRs. The turnaround started with the revelation that the "all or nothing" wasn't working. Baldelli stated that they had changed to a more balanced approach. Kiriloff, Martin & Miranda were hitting, Larnach & Kepler returned from the IL with a revamped swing, one by one they started to hit. In the middle of all that the winning streak started before the rally sausage appeared.

Does the rally sausage have anything to do with the streak? Yes, because even with the right approach the pressure to hit was still there. The sausage joke brought levity to the dugout, being more relaxed the hitter could execute. As heart-breaking it was to lose Lewis, it turned out to be a blessing disguised because the following slump opened the eyes of management. IMO we have a great lineup & see no need to try to go outside to change it. Our problem at the beginning of the season wasn't the lineup but the approach & we can't get distracted from that fact with the rally sausage. While I encourage to ride the rally sausage as long as we can, IMO using it as a HR trophy is in bad taste.

12 Comments


Recommended Comments

Doctor Gast

Posted

35 minutes ago, ashbury said:

None can stand, against the mighty sausage.

How long have you waited to say that?

Doctor Gast

Posted

I'd like to give some amendments. My computer crashed on my original writing & I forgot to include Jeffers on the list of hitters who started this winning streak. Jeffers last year had swerved from the "all or nothing" approach which took his hitting to another & more sustainable level.

Also a clipping I saw later I'd like to include. 

Hitting offspeed pitches
On April 21, the Twins were 7-13, and there was no secret as to why. The Twins were hitting a collective .195 at that point, having scored 67 runs in 20 games, an average of 3.35 runs per game. They’d been held to four or fewer runs in 17 of those games.

It seemed the book was out on them: Just throw them non-fastballs.

Before this streak, the Twins were seeing more offspeed and breaking pitches than anyone else in baseball (49.7%) and had the third-worst wOBA -- an all-encompassing offensive statistic -- on those pitches. Only the Oakland A’s were whiffing more often on those than the Twins, who were swinging through 39.6% of those pitches.

“Sometimes, just putting the ball in play and just trying to put as good of a swing as you can on the ball may be the most productive thing you can do,” manager Rocco Baldelli said.
 

1:27

Rocco Baldelli on Twins' 3-1 win over Red SoxSince the start of the streak, the Twins lead baseball in wOBA on non-fastballs. If anything, they’re seeing even more of them (52.9%) but have cut their whiff rate all the way down to 29.7%.They’ve scored five or more runs in all but two games amid this streak.

 
 
 
Karbo

Posted

I've been saying the Twins need to abandon this all or nothing approach for the last couple of years. Hit the ball hard where its pitched. There's a big field out there and only so many fielders. Putting the ball in play gives a chance of something good happening. Sure, swing for the fences early, but with 2 strikes just put the ball in play. Jeffers got the idea last year and look what its done for him.

Fatbat

Posted

As much as the game changes, it stays the same. Its a game of least failure, wins. All or nothing is destined to fail because failure will happen more often. Playing smart team ball and making to other team fail is the way to win more often. 

Doctor Gast

Posted

They have taken the sausage out of the garbage & trying for new life! But I reiterate that they can ride this sausage as long as they want as long as they don't lose sight what actually brought them success. The sausage without the hitting approach change would be just a piece of dead meat.

Doctor Gast

Posted

IMO it's time to put that sausage in the garbage. Yesterday's game stunk. Although the sausage served a purpose I believe that time has passed. From the beginning, Baldelli was not crazy about the sausage. I believe they were others that were negatively impressed by the sausage. Great hitters like Kiriloff & Martin have had poor performances during this rally sausage period & there have been others. IMO the sausage is stinking up the dugout metaphorically if not actually. Throw the sausage in the garbage not at each other. 

This thread is to put into perspective the real reason for the winning streak. It's a balanced hitting approach that doesn't strike-out in clutch situations. Not the sausage that can distract from that.

Doctor Gast

Posted

The Twins are again in a slump, what's up? Julien is still having trouble hitting that outside pitch & he doesn't want to change his swing, Other assumptions; maybe players like Kiriloff, Miranda, Martin & Castro are being overstretched in their defensive limits & it's affecting them offensively. Kiriloff & Miranda are better suited at 1B & they have been asked to play 3B & OF on almost a full-time basis with past arm problems that can cause extra strain both physically & emotionally that can affect their swing. & maybe Father Time is catching up to Santana.

Strombomb

Posted

On 5/5/2024 at 8:24 AM, Karbo said:

I've been saying the Twins need to abandon this all or nothing approach for the last couple of years. Hit the ball hard where its pitched. There's a big field out there and only so many fielders. Putting the ball in play gives a chance of something good happening. Sure, swing for the fences early, but with 2 strikes just put the ball in play. Jeffers got the idea last year and look what its done for him.

I agree 100%. Also, each player has strengths and weaknesses. A one-size approach is destined to fail. Don't be a lazy coach and rely on theory and statistics. Coach your players individually. You are going to have Judge/Trout type players and Arraez type players. Let them play to their strengths. 

Doctor Gast

Posted

Buxton was hesitant to touch the sausage but when he did he really let loose. I was worried about the sausage negatively affecting the players like Buck admitted. But maybe the other hesitant players need to drop their inhibitions about the sausage & embrace it. Well maybe at least touch it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...