No one wants to reach for lesser value, but why would you think it's a reach to take a pitcher but not a batter? They have to take someone, even if there is not a true #4 value. I'm not claiming to be an expert, but from my view, the pitchers look like they have much higher upside than the HS bats being discussed. I'll try this another way. The college arms aside from Manaea are likely all fairly close to MLB ready. They throw hard which everyone can clearly see is the number one factor in a dominant MLB arm right now, and they have a strong grasp of multiple pitches. There, I've made a minimal case that Appel, Gray, Manaea and Anderson are in fact the BP'sA, those that think the batters are better please rebut because I've heard no legit arguement for any of the bats, only implied trepidation that a pitcher surely can't be more valuable.