Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24,960

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    Agree. I've got serious complaints about his offenses, roster construction, trades, promotions and his choice in manager. Until this year, the MLB rotation has been exceptionally healthy and productive. It's easily his strongest area, so I'm not scratching the itch to complain about that part.
  2. nicksaviking
    Holy cow, maybe tone it down Rocco. The guy is just coming back and you're making him go up against the Bomba Squad?!?!?
  3. nicksaviking
    The Twins are hoping Boston will cut Jovani Moran first so they can make a plaque stating that they won the trade.
  4. nicksaviking
    You're right, I should have said he was there when they started dumping the debt on to the Twins. I should have merely said he's been there while they were dumping debt on to the Twins. However, we have a pretty good idea a vague idea of what the origin of the debt is, considering everyone has speculated it's from their real estate ventures going belly up after COVID and no one from the Pohlad clan is denying it.
  5. nicksaviking
    The debt was about 25% of the asking price, and reportedly they gave 25% of their ownership to the hedge funds new ownership groups. So it stands to reason, either they think they can ask for 25% more than the 1.7B in the next couple of years, or they aren't planning on selling. Third option, is to continue dumping real estate debt on the team, then get another investor to buy a stake and eat their debt again in a few years.
  6. nicksaviking
    Joe Pohlad has been in charge since they said they were going to 'right size' the payroll after the successful 2023 season. He was there when the organization started dumping it's other business debts on to the Twins.
  7. nicksaviking
    And even if they had no influence, we're talking about 'partners' that agreed to buy their debt in exchange for a percentage of the Twins. This sounds more like Tony Soprano or Big Gus's Payday Loans kind of sketchy to me.
  8. nicksaviking
    Right. Joe Pohlad also wanted to run two different radio stations and they soon went bankrupt. As to the debt situation, the real estate market isn't in any better shape than when they started dumping their losses on the Twins. I've seen enough HELOCs to know that people who find a quick way to consolidate their debt, don't tend to change their ways, they just start accruing different debt which will later need to be dealt with.
  9. nicksaviking
    Yeah, Gruden vs. The NFL; kind of sucks that I'm stuck here cheering for the lesser of the two bigots.
  10. nicksaviking
    Right. If only Vazquez had caught every game the last three years instead of Jeffers the Twins probably would be chasing their third 100 win season in a row.
  11. nicksaviking
    "We're going to move the Twins to Nashville! Surely you won't mind Mr. Reinsdorf?"
  12. nicksaviking
    The Twins have the fourth newest ballpark in the league. even excluding the vintage parks of the Dodgers, Red Sox and Cubs, that means there are 23 other clubs that would object if any Twins owner tried to steal their relocation threat cities.
  13. nicksaviking
    They are the 8 and 9 hitters and far and away the worst regulars on the team. Playing good baseball is contagious. Playing good baseball leads to winning and winning breads enthusiasm. Enthusiasm leads to more winning. It's a great cycle when you get into it like the early century Twins and the Rays from a few years ago. Everybody wants to emulate you but no one can really put a finger on what you're doing to win. Sure, when you're a smaller market, replacing your star players for younger star players will help the cycle, but that's not what the Brewers have done at this point, and it hardly ever happens because trading star players is a win for the team buying the star player just about every time. Even if you like their defense, the Brewers downgraded by removing those players, therefore it's not the reason for their winning.
  14. nicksaviking
    Sorry, but the Brewers aren't winning because they are nimble with their roster, they're winning despite being nimble with their roster: "On the other hand, the contemporary, successful iteration of Milwaukee, led by Arnold (and formerly David Stearns), has been exceptionally active in recent seasons, trading away star players nearing free agency—like Josh Hader, Corbin Burnes, and Devin Williams—for hefty packages. Indirectly, the team got William Contreras by trading Hader. Directly, they acquired the left side of their infield (Caleb Durbin and Joey Ortiz) in trades that gave up Burnes and Williams, and those deals also yielded pitching depth and an extra draft pick." They traded away Hader, Burnes and Williams and are winning because they flipped them for Durbin and Ortiz? Durbin and Ortiz were prize prospects, but they aren't good pro ball players; at least not at this time. This is not why the Brewers are winning.
  15. nicksaviking
    Well, it's like the old philosophical question, if Joe Ryan swears on a Twins broadcast and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?
  16. nicksaviking
    Right, the Twins are losing money either because of the way they are cooking the books or because of ineptitude. Sorry, that shouldn't have been an OR, obviously it should be an AND. No other team is carrying 400M (I heard 450M) in debt.
  17. nicksaviking
    I don't know, I've seen way worse. To me the 'Like it or Not' part is way worse than the 'Stability' part, but only because I want to imagine 100% of the readers being in the 'Not' camp, but obviously there's never a consensus and honestly, I don't hate EVERYTHING Derek Falvey has done. I understood where he was going with the headline right away, in short, sorry all, but Falvey and Baldelli are safe (I'd be less equivocal about Baldelli personally, he got an option picked up, not an extension) so I'm guessing the lack of fire and brimstone probably made people just assume it wasn't a cathartic pitchfork op-ed. I'd like a few of those, but this was objectively fine.
  18. nicksaviking
    Are you even able to link a Red Sox site here? I have to think even the most considerate post would violate at least ten of our posting policies.
  19. nicksaviking
    Why is everyone jumping on Cody about the 'stability' aspect? I'm trying to decipher where in the article it was used as a celebration and my conclusion is that people are reading the headline but not the article. 'Stability' appeared to be used as a objective statement regarding Derek Falvey and the ownership's future status. The article seemed to understand that this 'stability' wasn't going to be popular. The word wasn't being used as a positive silver lining kind of statement, it was merely being used to describe what the Pohlad's stubbornly prefer, even in the face of poor performances.
  20. nicksaviking
    Well two can play that game:
  21. nicksaviking
    I do love how it implies the Pohlads never had a passion for the Twins, and only now, after seeing and hearing the passion from their partners, the community, and Twins fans have the Pohlads too developed a passion and are inspired to building a winning team! It's like the end of the Grinch, this is all fantastic news! Also, I wonder which hedge fund has this deep passion for Twins baseball?
  22. nicksaviking
    MLBTR isn't typically a news or opinion site as much as it is a rumor roundup, but I do appreciate Steve Adams making it clear how disappointed and screwed Twins fans are with this news. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/08/pohlad-family-no-longer-pursuing-sale-of-twins.html
  23. nicksaviking
    They will remain in Minnesota because it's best for the other 29 billionaires. The Twins blackmailed their way into a new stadium only 15 years ago and now there are other teams waiting. They aren't going to let the Twins budge in line and take away Nashville, Montreal or one of the other threat cities the other billionaires are currently using as blackmail.
  24. nicksaviking
    Joe Mauer, the hometown kid guy who up and made Florida his primary residence so he could avoid paying taxes? Yeah, I got a pretty good idea what he would prioritize.
  25. nicksaviking
    Maybe this isn't the end of the situation as Manfred was JUST saying a deal was right around the corner. Are the other owners aware of this new arrangement? Or did he just drop the news to everyone all at once, because based on Joe's track record, there likely was no strategy to any of this. The other owners are going to have to approve the limited partners. and the other owners aren't going to want the Twins to be a perennial revenue recipient team. This market hasn't always and doesn't need to be a revenue sharing recipient, but the other owners have to know it will be if the Pohlad's are still running things. Maybe they'll throw us a Hail Mary and not approve the limited partners.
×
×
  • Create New...