Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    I'm told he needs to acclimate or something. Unlike every player Minnesota traded away ....
  2. Mike Sixel
    Well, Kiersey is in Minnesota, and outman is not.....
  3. Mike Sixel
    He might not be for a bit ....
  4. Mike Sixel
    Is it? One new guy is on the roster.
  5. Mike Sixel
    Only that fangraphs calls him a fifty for fielding and running. He's an interesting get.
  6. Mike Sixel
    I doubt there will be a crunch, but they have maybe 15 guys on the roster that should be next year. As you add MLB players, you're going to take spaces. I'm likely just still spicy from yesterday.
  7. Mike Sixel
    Sort of? It's the hitting and fielding, for to awful drafts and development, that is the core that needed replacing. That was really my point. That part isn't changed at all. Indeed, only one new player is on the roster...... And somehow no one could be better in center than Martin or Kiersey......
  8. Mike Sixel
    Yup. And they did. Hours ago. I was wrong about the rule.
  9. Mike Sixel
    I thought players needed time to adjust to new teams? That's what I was told a few pages back....
  10. Mike Sixel
    Can you give us a few highlights? If not, that's ok.
  11. Mike Sixel
    Someone asked on another thread if I thought there would be a 40 man crunch in the off season, given all the guys that could go.....well, at some point they need to add 7 relief pitchers (or SP) to the 40 man to actually field a team next year, so, yes, I think trading for a bunch of guys that need to be on the 40 man was one of several mistakes.
  12. Mike Sixel
    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/winners-and-losers-from-the-2025-trade-deadline/ In both the winners and their own special category of losers list.
  13. Mike Sixel
    One trade addition added......one. Impressive!
  14. Mike Sixel
    Given what Falvey said in his letter, and that they called up a bunch of guys in their mid 20s and 30s, I don't think they picked a lane.....
  15. Mike Sixel
    Well, they don't think this is a rebuild, so they disagree with me. But, if you are in rebuild mode, then you don't deal for almost anyone on the 40 man.
  16. Mike Sixel
    I don't think that's the core that was killing them, and they clearly think they are easily replaceable. But, sure, we can call that a former core.
  17. Mike Sixel
    I was trying to be nice.
  18. Mike Sixel
    Makes you wonder why they traded for guys that have to be on the 40 man.....well, makes me wonder.
  19. Mike Sixel
    So much for clearing the decks for legit prospects to get their feet wet.......(I think they think Roden is a legit prospect, and maybe Ohl).
  20. Mike Sixel
    There might be 4 MLB players on that list....(note I said Might). Only Ohl is a legit pitcher, imo, in that list.
  21. Mike Sixel
    I don't get how that works better than doing it in the majors against the pitching he needs to figure out? I'm sticking with this guy being DFA within 12 months.
  22. Mike Sixel
    Martin starting in CF? I mean, I guess? I thought that was the whole point of trading for Outman?
  23. Mike Sixel
    The only core they got rid of is CC. That's it. Nothing else has changed in the core.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Hmmmm. I was led to believe he'd played more than that! Julien at first? Who is the 1B at this point?
  25. Mike Sixel
    They traded a useful RP for a guy that can't beat out Kiersey for a roster spot, even though he's 28......or am I mixing up who went for whom?
×
×
  • Create New...