This. If you can get a 50 value prospect in AA, deal him. If not? I guess you give him the rest of this year.
And I'm 100 percent not a believer.... My issue with keeping him? He's not that good, but you refuse to move on because they took him 1 overall.
Twins need to match the best record in the AL to make the playoffs and people want to invest the future for this year?
Zero people are saying aim for 2030, can we not have ridiculous straw man arguments?
Nearly every player in the organization was brought in by falvey...... And he's the problem?
It's the owners, and their budget cuts. I don't understand how this is difficult?
23 million for 100 games, 85 or so at catcher is a lot of money. I mean, if they are going to invest like sixty more million in the team next year, sure?
He's never caught close to 2/3 of the games.
I understand why people want to sign him, but I also don't think people realize how few games he plays in a year.
I have zero confidence in HS pitchers who can't stay healthy or throw strikes (or, even, in general, until they are very good in AA or above), so I'd do it.....For a number 3/4 that just pitches 5-7 innings, yes, yes I would.
I doubt SEA is looking for a catcher, but maybe they want Raleigh at DH?
Maybe they are? I think you could go Larnach, Jeffers, Lewis (not sure they trust him over Naylor)....maybe if you take money back? I don't know....I htinnk you have to give up a prospect in this deal. I'd do:
Jeffers, Larnach, Hill or Soto for Hancock. I'd sub in EMrod if they want him instead .
Seattle has a SP in the minors ready to go.......