Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,958

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    I just don't agree with this, so much......
  2. Mike Sixel
    Charles Mack..... FG has him listed at 2B, MN announced as a SS.....here is FG stuff: #123 Northeast prep bat with stiff, uppercut swing, gap power, good chance to stay on the dirt.
  3. Mike Sixel
    Ceiling, floor.
  4. Mike Sixel
    I like the idea of taking riskier players at this point......
  5. Mike Sixel
    here's one I didn't expect to read, given how much KLAW likes Lewis: Kyle 2:59 Would Royce Lewis have been your top position player in this draft? Keith Law 3:00 No.
  6. Mike Sixel
    KLAW just posted this.....in chat: Cole Sands left his last start of the year with an injury, but the Twins just took him in the 5th round. That's a mild surprise to me - maybe the injury turned out to be nothing.
  7. Mike Sixel
    Number 78 on FG: Has cleaned up his delivery since high school, regularly shows three above average pitches
  8. Mike Sixel
    Also, at this point....they probably have close to an agreement in place......so I doubt he goes back to school.
  9. Mike Sixel
    Fangraphs had him 110th.....here is the summary: Athletic enigma who has dealt with injury issues, which may have masked his skills.
  10. Mike Sixel
    Maybe he'll be Gary Sanchez!
  11. Mike Sixel
    I don't know that it is "extremely likely he'll break down".....which is very different than an increase of some percent he gets injured....
  12. Mike Sixel
    how do you know that last part is true? I just can't see how we know that at all.
  13. Mike Sixel
    Well, Jorge was a temporary thing....but I forgot about him. It's not any kind of judgement by me at all, I'm just trying to figure out how they are going to work....
  14. Mike Sixel
    I think that depends on how he starts out....but likely 3 years at least. Unless his bat is so awesome it can't be waited on....
  15. Mike Sixel
    In their summary, FG said he had a chance to stay behind the plate. Better? Non zero chance is how scouts talk about a guy that has a chance, but isn't likely. They don't give an actual percentage because that's kind of silly.
  16. Mike Sixel
    It was. I was saying if they keep to type, they are going to need to start making trades to have pitchers
  17. Mike Sixel
    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/day-one-draft-recap/
  18. Mike Sixel
    Gonna need pitchers too. Or be willing to trade highly valued prospects.
  19. Mike Sixel
    No. It means he has a chance to stay at catcher, unlike some others. It's the opposite of what you just typed.
  20. Mike Sixel
    I will take that bet.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Rooker, now these two. They appear to have a type.
  22. Mike Sixel
    Why not take the player they like now? They don't pick for some time.....
  23. Mike Sixel
    To what end? They can't save much money at this point.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Number 77 on fangraphs.... Here is their summary.... Big catcher with non-zero chance to stay back there and above-average raw power
  25. Mike Sixel
    Isn't that true of every pick? I'm not sure what your point is.
×
×
  • Create New...