Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Kepler was 13th in RF war. If he's a fourth outfielder, there must not be as many teams as I think there are.
  2. Austin, Garver, Sano, should rotate there. No to Grossman even being iyn the roster, please. I would not be opposed to adding a player, but I'd hope he has position flexibility.
  3. I'm not sure a 26% difference is all that close. And, let's be honest.....if it was a real effort, no, they were not "right" about the years, they were lucky they didn't bid the most. Because if we are saying they are lucky to avoid he injury, it happened in year 1, not year 4 or 5 or 6..... I don't really care about the context of Ryan and his unwillingness (or the ownership's) to spend money. They aren't competing against Terry Ryan, they are competing against the other teams in MLB. We'll know a lot more after this off season. but, I'm not sure how anyone can look at the first two years and say this FO is risk takers.
  4. They weren't even close on Darvish. And, signing a RP to a 2 year deal is risk taking? That seems like a pretty low bar
  5. Zero long term contracts last off season, one minor trade. No big effort to add to the team last trade deadline, just a tweak here and there. What evidence is there that they will take risks? Until they do, they haven't. So far, they've only taken the risk of trading away players for minor league players.....
  6. One team added legit OF, even though they had some OF already, the other did not. One team built a great bullpen, the other did not (and even traded maybe their best RP for some reason). One team really tried to improve, the other was complimented for finding great value on mostly entirely one year deals (meaning even if they worked, they'd have to replace all those guys again). I prefer the Milwaukee strategy of finding long term MLB players, frankly.
  7. I also prefer an extension at this point.....but if they can't do that and they don't add a big time bat and SP, I'd deal him. I'd guess he returns a top 50 - 75 talent, give or take. Kind of depends on who signs who this off season. I'd be aiming for C, 3B, starting pitcher type (who clearly has to be more than a year or two away).
  8. What did your post mean, then? Because it sure seemed like you said it was flushing cash. Also, that article fails to examine the alternative, of using pitchers that never even saw the majors. Because of you don't acquire new pitchers, you have to use your minor league pitchers.
  9. signing a good RP is flushing the cash? you have that little faith in the FO? Who is more likely to be good as a RP next year, DeJong, or a guy that has been good in the majors?
  10. do we have any evidence they are number 1 in the country in giving back? that seems unlikely. I do like your list. I think all of that is as important as winning. But, I never find it productive to the conversation to tell other people how to be the right kind of fan..... I have no idea what that last line even means.
  11. I'm not sure why we are worried about cost effective for a 2-3 year deal for a RP.....they are flush with money, and every single veteran on the roster (3?) is a FA after next year. It's about picking the right 1-2 guys, not about money. Even for a mid market team, given the context of their current players, they can afford 1-2 "expensive" RPs imo. As for variability, that is largely driven by sample size issues. It doesn't take many bad breaks, when you only pitch 40-60 innings, to have bad outcomes. I'm happy to read someone that thinks they can develop RPs (based on what history), and that those players will somehow be more consistent and better than guys that have been successful. Or, do they need to pick all new RPs every year, since it is variable?
  12. Now we are really far afield........and in the weeds too..... I predict Polanco is the starting SS next year. 70% likely. 30% likely the starting 2B.
  13. Just as we'd accept a bad but not horrible hitter if his defense was in the top 10 or 20 in all the league..... But, the players we are discussing aren't that at all.
  14. Then I either read it 100% wrong, or your post isn't as clear as you think...because it read like don't promote guys faster.....at least to me.
  15. For some reason, ABC is punishing the PNW, and making us watch Nebraska v Northwestern.....
  16. Seems to be working for the Nationals, and Astros, and others....maybe the problem is here, and not with the strategy itself.....
  17. Help me understand how bringing in 1 year deals helps a team that lost 84 games be competitive? And if it doesn't, what is the point? I'm genuinely asking, what is the point of spending a lot of money on adding 1 hitter to this lineup? As for the rotation, Odo, Pineda, and Gibson are free agents next year. How do you propose having a good rotation in 2020, if you don't add anyone this year? Even if you are lucky, and 2 new guys work out, you are still 2 starters short in 2020. Again, I'm genuinely asking, because I don't see the same path.....
  18. Actually, the league is getting younger and younger, the exact opposite of what you are saying. why? Because teams are realizing that players start aging earlier than thought, and they are realizing none of them are finished products when they come up, so get them up earlier. Literally the exact opposite of what you are saying. Stars are coming up earlier and earlier too........and no, don't try the "not everyone can be Harper or Trout" strawman. The stats are clear, the league is much younger now than it was.
  19. Then why not trade Gibson at this point? I don't know what you mean by moderate, but he's a top 20-30 starting pitcher right now....that has real value. And, go big for some of us is add 1 legit player this year, to a longer than 1 year deal.....then see what happens next year.
  20. KLAW with some thoughts: first link is my Twins' excerpt, second link is the original post.... http://twinsdaily.com/topic/30723-twins-stuff-from-around-the-web-fangraphs-twitter-athletic-non-local-news-sites-etc/?p=799618 http://meadowparty.com/blog/2018/10/11/klawchat-10-11-18/
  21. It might do good things in 2020....signing/trading for guys with 3-5 years of contract time left isn't JUST about next year......whether Buxton and Sano are good or not, they need to add talent that is around for more than 1 year.
  22. Like I said....it was more a question....but for all the love Eddie gets (former MIF, btw)....he barely outhit Polanco.
  23. Sure, I agree with that......but the question is what to do with Polanco and Kepler and Rosario......Also, do people really think a team with Rosario, Buxton, Kepler and Cave is going to go add a .900 OPS hitter? btw.....how many of those are FA or going to be traded, by the way? Rosario and Polanco, btw, were nearly identical in wrc+ this year....... Polanco would be league median as a corner OF as a hitter....not ideal, but not some kind of crime against humanity either. edit: needs more btw..... another edit: You don't think they are counting on Kiriloff being in MN in 2020? I do. Oh, and Rooker. And Lewis. Do people really think they are going to go get a legit corner OF with more than 1 year left on their deal?
×
×
  • Create New...