Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. CBS has MN picking 12th in their recent mock drafts. No way they are that bad. MN wins 11 games, maybe 12. Win a playoff game, then lose. I'd be thrilled if the Bills won it all (assuming it isn't against MN).
  2. Pretty sure the analytics would say not to run on that hit.....maybe the coach just felt he'd make it. Went with his gut. We don't know.
  3. Nine innings of three run ball for the Twins pitchers. This is on the "offense". Arraez and CC really need to hit, or this team is done.
  4. Who should pitch in a close game they might win? Because I'm pretty sure the site would think it was stupid to bring in most anyone else in a close game. Who should have come in?
  5. Because there aren't other options, given Kepler's health? Not sure why Kepler is on the roster at this point, but that's not on the manager.
  6. Even for a leadoff hitter in the national league? Tough crowd.
  7. Great job by Varland. And the Twins for helping him get to this point.
  8. He makes an out 60% of the time. You pitch to him here.
  9. 4 innings, one run, two hits? 15 pitches per inning? I'd take that 100% of the time. Also, dang, more people live on my block than are at this game * *slight exaggeration.
  10. What would you like? To walk him every at bat. He makes outs more than he hits home runs.
  11. 6 of 8 games with a home run. It isn't how they pitch him. Or, don't give him credit. Up to you.
  12. Truth. All of that was amassed early, though. Imagine if he was healthy on that pace.....hence an honorable mention that it is bad he's not. Like, 1-2 wins bad (not Pagan bad, though).
  13. Bundy is the most under appreciated on this site for sure. He has more starts with 3 or less runs given up than more, and it isn't close.
  14. I'd give Pagan all five spots if possible. I don't get how three years of being BAD at your job allows you to stay on the team because you have "stuff". Buxton could be an honorable mention, frankly. Outside the start of the year, they've gotten little to nothing from him
  15. Which he never complained about before LA, which was my point. As for the evil word I used, you might not think that, but the users of this site sure do.
  16. Maadon was successful in Tampa and Chicago, using evil analytics. He went to LA where they have a bad reputation for how they use data. Now he hates data? I'm thinking this is about LA, and not data.
  17. As a former middle manager, I can assure you he has instructions from above, and freedom to act. There is no such thing as only following a spreadsheet. That's a ridiculous meme with no reality. As for judging his decisions? They aren't his alone. There will never be a baseball manager again that acts without the guidance of the front office and others. And that's likely good for making better decisions as a whole. Those won't always work, as no good process can cover for bad decisions or bad luck. Judge as you want, but my hope is this site does so intelligently and with some humor and humanity.
  18. I'm not sure why Sisk isn't on the Twins. Congrats to all these players for a great month.
  19. That's what the data says, yes. I found it hard to believe, but that's the data.
  20. He's saying it doesn't matter what your record is versus good or bad teams, just your overall record. Perhaps I misunderstood the point.
  21. I thought we were talking the process, not one guy now. Or did I misunderstand how the talk expanded? That's why I suggested we also need to look at the price paid for these guys. Mahle being hurt stinks. I'm very disappointed, as I really thought he'd be a difference maker.
  22. There was a recent article on fangraphs examining the kind of data you quote. It isn't predictive at all. Overall record is, but not how you got that record.
  23. Judge is going to hit around 65 home runs, and people are blaming the pitchers. I don't get why Pagan is on this roster. It's indefensible. He's been terrible for three years.
  24. Fair. I have no idea. They took chances, and paid lower prices on Maeda and Paddock just they been healthy. It didn't work. But maybe, just maybe, that's why the prices were what they were, and it just didn't work. If they'd have been trading for healthy, very good, pitchers at this rate, they'd be out of prospects. I really don't think people are looking at the relative cost, and asking why it was so low ... There is a lot more going on than just what they bought.
×
×
  • Create New...