Mike Sixel
-
Posts
46,991 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
330
Content Type
Profiles
News
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Mike Sixel
-
Lewis' draft position is a sunk cost. He should play where he adds the most value to the MLB team. That might be third, it might not, but his draft position is irrelevant to the discussion at this point. I doubt he hits enough next year to be a consideration, and he certainly isn't to start the year......
-
Yup. I was overly brief in my response to a post.... Lewis will be lucky to be in Minnesota at all next year.....
-
That post had nothing to do with next year.... It was about Lewis ever playing third.
-
Even if he's the best option?
-
For a free agent or three, yes. For many of them? No. Cruz is gone after this coming year, freeing up a lot of money then. There will always be movement of expensive players....
-
Greinke cost Houston their 3, 4, and 5th rated prospects....so, maybe it would be the Twins 7-9th? We haven't seen that either..... Of course, 3-5 has more value to Houston than 7-9 for MN...because MN has more highly rated prospects right now.
-
Twins also did not beat the price for Stroman, even though it was two not highly rated players (though both were likely under rated due to their short time in the minors so far).
-
Look at Zac Gallen, for example.....he cost the 59th (give or take) rated prospect....a price many here were glad MN did not pay. He's a legit 3, maybe 2, with years of control left, and people would rather have a prospect (who would have 1-2 more years of playing time......).
-
Not to mention at the start of the year, bringing in a number five starter instead of someone else. This mess is their own making.
-
I'm not missing the point... I'm saying it isn't always that easy.... Also, I'm saying we are still waiting for them to even trade three good prospects for one player, let alone do it multiple times.... And have it work every time.
-
But they did it. They traded multiple prospects at the deadline for Verlander, and multiple for Cole. And for Pressley. And others. The twins did not really go for it this break. Hopefully that changes now.
-
My top four, in no order.... Kepler, Cruz, Berrios, Garver.... Though I might vote for Odorrizi with more thought
-
Of course, Houston just graduated future star Alvarez. But I don't get the point. Isn't it easier to draft if you aren't that good, so shouldn't the twins have more top prospects? Aren't they in a position to trade for prospects going into this last year, not trade from prospects? If they didn't have a lot more that would be bad. If they emulate Houston, they will trade at least eight of those players in the next two years.... So, about the same number....
- 33 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- rocco baldelli
- wes johnson
- (and 2 more)
-
He'd be my second or third acquisition.... Not the headliner.
-
I'm just glad there were 4 legit candidates.....
- 6 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- taylor rogers
- jose berrios
- (and 3 more)
-
I've been on the Gray wagon for years......but he's got less and less team control left, and a longer history of not succeeding like I hope.....that said, I don't think much of CO's FO, and their ability with pitchers, so I'd target him (but then, I've wanted him in MN since the draft.....so what do I know?).....
- 51 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- matthew boyd
- robbie ray
- (and 2 more)
-
I'm not sure I understand.....no team can keep every player they have ever acquired.
-
this thread is literally asking if the Twins will be the next houston......
-
The Cubs win the world series, and until this year made the playoffs.... Sometimes trades work, and sometimes not. But suggesting never trading top prospects.... That seems unrealistic to me, if you want great players in return. I could be wrong, maybe they can get great players back without every dealing actual good or great prospects....
-
That's not the content I was replying to.... But agreed.
-
Easy choice. He needs more at bats.
-
Trade for good players, without dealing good prospects? That's not how it works. That's not what Houston, or the Yankees, or the red Sox, or any of the winners do it.
- 51 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- matthew boyd
- robbie ray
- (and 2 more)
-
Houston traded for expensive players, and signed at least one to an extension. They also dealt highly regarded prospects for another. This team has done neither. Until that changes, no, they aren't the next Houston. The window is open. If it doesn't change this off season....
- 33 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- rocco baldelli
- wes johnson
- (and 2 more)
-
Not Dobnak, he's a full time starter under this plan.
-
Who makes Pineda's first seven to eight starts? Do you think they'll win even a third of those?
