Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Hmmmm. This Tweet doesn't match your numbers. Also, until Zips is totally released, and we can look at Zips and Steamer, I need more data.
  2. But yes, Philly is going for it. And, as I've pointed out, since they signed players this year, they didn't lose that all important "financial flexibility" last year.....
  3. Hardly a ringing endorsement of MN's future.......
  4. The original post said Washington did not go all in, they went all out........
  5. There are no FA possibilities left....I think that's what people mean when they say there is nothing left. Nearly all the trade candidates are only signed for 1-2 years, so the TWins payroll guys should like that. Of course, that means you are in teh same position again next year, needing 1-3 starting pitchers.
  6. What's your plan? Not what shouldn't they do, what should they do, now that they did not sign a FA, which when the off season started, you were for?
  7. It is false they went all out. They raised payroll and added multiple free agents.
  8. We aren't in July. If they are out of it in July, then sell
  9. Who trades controllable pitching for a pitcher with one year left? And if they trade him for a prospect, they should sell the team.
  10. This is the opposite of true. They signed the most expensive free agent pitcher last year. And others. Nothing about this post is accurate.
  11. Agreed. The Mets are not making their MLB team worse this year. They are adding to it.
  12. . Because rookies aren't usually league average. Because the free agents have already shown they can be successful. Do you expect all three rookies to be good this year? Better than they could have signed?
  13. No idea. They didn't sign any new starting pitchers. I don't know who is actually available for trade, and the history of trades shows not many good pitchers are traded..... As I've pointed out for some time. But then, I've posted what I would do, and not just said no to everyone else..... I guess my answer has to be trade for the best pitcher they can, assuming they think he's a number three or better.
  14. They haven't added any of them that weren't already on the team, which is the point. But you know that. anyone ranked below Pineda is still likely to be better than three rookies. What would you have done? Not sign Ryu to 4 years, or any to 4 years or more. So, what would you have done, or do now?
  15. The only one I don't like is Pressley. He was signed for another year, and they didn't have enough relief pitchers. The mistake with Lynn was not signing him earlier in the off season, so he'd be ready for the season. He's exactly the pitcher some of us thought he was in TX.....
  16. 24 of Fangraphs top 30 starting pitchers are off the market. This isn't only about the top end, but passing on the next tier, and the next tier.
  17. no one is forgetting that.....but many said the lack of depth was a problem before either happened.....
  18. I see almost no chance Sano is signed. And barely any for Buxton.
  19. They will have to be. But that's not what the post said..
  20. One of whom is controlled for one more year.....
  21. Free agency has not been crazy. It has been the same at the last few years. The difference is that there are more good players this year. But the money is in line with the last few years.
×
×
  • Create New...