Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. True or not, living in constant fear that every change is bad must be just awful for people. Makes me sad
  2. The people that moved to Florida to not pay taxes? Unlikely.
  3. You'd only need to win at this level about fifteen to twenty times.... Good luck!
  4. Certainly a surprise to wake up to! I'm not the biggest fans of the current owners.... So I'm cautiously optimistic. Pretty much guarantee no real new spending, though. I wonder if Levine knew about this?
  5. They have a winning record. They have a pipeline of pitching and OFers. Just go back and look at the team before they came. SWR says hi. They aren't dealing young players for prospects, like that post implied. At all. Hell, they aren't dealing veterans either, other than Polanco. They held Kepler this year, for example.
  6. Do I believe they don't take savings from one year to the next? 100 percent
  7. The Twins don't carry money over year to year. They've told us that in the past.
  8. The one position the Twins are deep on in the minors with TOP prospects is OF. No way I'm dealing for another OF prospect. And who's your catcher? I just don't like this idea. It might be fair in a vacuum, though I think the Twins get more, but it doesn't make sense in context of the Twins. If, and it's a big if imo, Jax is a legit starter, he's more valuable here unless dealt for a SS or C or elite 1b.
  9. Which isn't real.... This is not good short term. We did team a valuable lesson though. They'll cut spending a year before they have to, but where do they spend the savings?
  10. Which has nothing to do with wearing down. It's clear that the FO was wrong about Margot and his defense. I have no idea how that's on the coaching. Younger guys? They definitely need to do something different.
  11. They can't have only three weeks. I have no issue with this bye.
  12. The same staff that was here in 2023 when they finished strong? I don't get this idea that somehow they forgot how to coach.....the easiest explanation is the players didn't play well.
  13. You've made that determination after a handful of games.... For a top 100 prospect?
  14. No. Just no. The only way this happens is if the team deals Lopez and gets a catcher, which would be stupid.
  15. Stefanski will be fired. The owner can't admit it is his fault....
  16. Players don't force they way up in MN., They only come up if there is an injury or terrible performance (and even then, it doesn't always happen). I can see Jenkins staying down all year, so they can start him in 2025 and hope for rookie of the year.
×
×
  • Create New...