clone52

Well, I was going to respond in one way, but I see that Ryan and Lopez are the same age. I do think Lopez will come cheaper. If money were no object, I'd go Ryan all the way, but based on what I think contract would look like, Lopez might be the way to go. I think Lopez will have to balance whether he wants to extend now, or bet on himself that he bounces back from the injury. If both have good years next year, Lopez is probably a little cheaper.

I also like Clemens as that swing guy that could play almost every day, but at 1B, 2B, corner OF, maybe 3B.

I am going to assume they aren't going to go get Skubal. Not sure there is another Ace type available. If several veterans that maybe would sign for 2-3 years at $20M AAV. Probably some younger guys who could be had around that for a longer contract. Could go the trade route, but that's where its going to hurt if you really like prospects. If you could build a package around Tait, Rodriguez, maybe one of the guys who have made their MLB debut, or Rojas, Quick or Soto? Could Tait, Rodriguez and Quick get you Hunter Greene if you thought he'd stay healthy? Logan Webb? Will the Marlins trade Alcantera (only 2027 left) Could the Rays sell high on Rasmussen (only 2027 left) list from yesterday Tarik Skubal, Kevin Gausman, Freddy Peralta, Michael King (opt-out), Sandy Alcantara (club option), Shane Bieber, Corbin Burnes (opt-out), Brandon Woodruff, Tatsuya Imai (opt-out), Jack Flaherty, Sonny Gray (club option/player option), Clay Holmes (opt-out), Shota Imanaga, Robbie Ray, Nick Pivetta (opt-out), Zac Gallen, Chris Bassitt, Luis Severino (player option), Justin Verlander, Max Scherzer, Tyler Mahle, José Berríos (opt-out), Brady Singer, Zach Eflin (mutual option), Trevor Rogers, David Peterson, Matthew Boyd (mutual option), Taijuan Walker, Jameson Taillon, Jeffrey Springs (club option), Drew Rasmussen (club option), Casey Mize, Dustin May (mutual option), Nick Martinez (mutual option), Zack Littell (mutual option), Lucas Giolito (mutual option)

1) They better, or at least get a starting C with Caratini as backup. 2) Larnach, yes, unless he is a trade piece for an upgrade elsewhere. Bell, no 3) I'd trying to do Ryan, but guessing he wants free agency. I'd see if Pablo was open to a 1 year extension, understanding he might not recover well. Owed about $22M. Would he take $10-15M for 2028? Probably not but if you can get the injury discount, go for it. 4) All could be around but I wouldn't call any of them foundational building blocks. More ancillary pieces to fill in around the building blocks. All could be available for trade if it improves the roster. 5) Would like to see them go this route, but since it doesn't matter for 2027 and 2028, I don't care to much. 6) I would try to extend Ryan and go get another starter for around $20M AAV. Not an ace obviously, but a solid #2 or #3. Maybe explore a Hunter Green trade? I would spend money/trade to raise the floor of 1B, 2B or 3B. Heck, maybe a 2/40 deal for Arraez? Trade for Hunter Goodman?

I was curious about how different folks ranked the prospects traded. MLB Sam Dykstra: Dasan Hill #17 Reyes #22 return for Guasman out of Top 25 ESPN McDaniel Reyes #16 Hill #18 return for Gausman was out #43 and #49 Can't read Baseball America Fangraphs: Reyes #15 Hill #24 return for Gausman was #70 and #72

Don't disagree with much in here, but its a BIG leap to say they could have gotten Gausman instead of Kremer for a much cheaper price. Yes, some rankings are very high on Reyes, others are not as high. Maybe the Twins asked for Gausman and the Blue Jays asked for Reyes and Quentin Young? Can't just take 1 set of rankings and assume that is how everyone has them.

Not yet, depends on if they back it up this offseason. He also said "We did that in a small way at the Trade Deadline. You’ll see more of it next year.” So he's not saying the trade deadline was the final plan it was masterful. He said the trade deadline was a small way of doing what they want to do and that piece was masterful. If the entire plan was to really contend next year and the other pieces will drop in the offseason, them maybe it was masterful. Did they lose anyone they care about for a 2027-2028 plan? Answer is probably no Did they take on a ton of salary that hurts their offseason plan for 2027-2028? Answer is probably no Did they find some pieces that can be at least a small part of the 2027-2028 plan? Answer is probably yes.

If you goal is a championship in 2027 or 2028, those moves weren't that bad. I can see your point on Kremer, but not because of the future of Rojas. Maybe you could have used Rojas to get someone else instead of Kremer. What do they need to do this offseason to really contend in 2027? I'd say a starting Cather, a Top 3 pitcher and an offensive upgrade at 1B, 2B or 3B (assuming Culpepper or Houston snatches the starting SS role. Lewis, Clemens and Lee are okay at the other 3 spots but an upgrade at any one of them could work. You could fairly easily do this and have a payroll around $140 million next year.

So many ways to think about the trade deadline as a whole. All depends on your priorities and outlook. Wanting to contend for a championship this year? F. Not enough to get it done Wanting to contend for playoffs this year and championship next year with no major offseason moves? C- or D+ Got a hole at C for next year and you really are relying on health and player development to be a championship contender this year. Wanting to contend for playoffs this year and championship next year with appropriate offseason moves (Starting C, Top 1-3 SP and another above league average bat somewhere): A or A-. None of the prospects the twins lost will start impacting the team until 2028 at the earliest, probably 2029. Can probably sign AJ Minter next year if you want to contend (and he likes Minnesota). The only reason I say A- is that I think there was likely a move to be made with Tait and/or Emmanual Rodriguez. If you are demoralized, know the Pohlads will never spend enough to contend, know MLB won't fix things with a cap/floor and your only Twins happines is hoping for the stars to align on enough prospects at the right time: F

Didn't read all the replies, but here are my thoughts. I kinda waver between being competitive this year and also realizing a championship (league or world series is very, very unlikely). Whatever gets done, I don't want to hurt chances in 2027. I feel the trade deadline did this. Helped this year, but didn't hurt 2027. Obviously didn't do enough to completely contend in 2027, but it took steps that would need to be backed up this offseason. 1) Absolutely send Gray down. If Culpepper is ready, great. If not sure, call up Ben Ross. Heck, even let Marek Houston make the jump from AA. Roster need is someone that start at SS. 2) If you could guarantee me the Twins could keep Alex Jackson, do it. If the Twins FO was sold on picking up a starting C in the offseason (free agent or trade), do it. If the Front office wants to go with Caratini as the starting C next year, then they don't have much of an in house backup option. But could get a backup C in ;the offseason, though. Honestly, this probably has more to do with what you backfill it with? Wallner? When would he play? DH against righties (with Larnach in the OF). Bell has been pretty good against righties, though, so I don't think Wallner is a huge upgrade. I was told Bell at 1B was a non-starter, so swapping Wallner for Bell, does that really move the needle much? If you could call someone up who hits lefties well, thats definitely a need. Honestly, if you risk losing Jackson, I probably replace him with Gabriel Gonzalez. He's done a lot better against lefties than righties this year. If you have 40 man space, Sabato would be a good choice. After typing it up, I would send Jackson down and bring up Gonzalez or Sabato and plug them into the lineup against Lefties. That could move the needle. 3) Duh, of course, can't imagine anyone disagrees with this.

If you are looking for offense, Bell beats out Royce against eighties. Giving up defense though.

With the Mariners releasing Mitch Garver, might not be a bad time to try and send Jackson down to AAA and see if syou can slip him past everyone

If everyone is healthy and Jenkins is the only callup, I think you see this lineup a lot vs. RHP DH Larnach CF Buxton C Jeffers 1B Bell 2B Clemens LF Keaschall RF Jenkins 3B Lee SS Kreidler vs. LHP CF Buxton C Jeffers 1B Lewis DH Bell 2B Clemens LF Martin RF Jenkins or Keaschall (whoever can hit lefties better) 3B Lee SS Kreidler

Could have sold and saved a lot of money instead. Would you prefer that. No one is giving the Pohlad's medals, but you absolutely can't argue the strict math. Spent more money on a trade deadline than they have in a decade. Next step is to see them build it up in the offseason for 2027. Go get another SP for the rotation and a solid replacement at C at a bare minimum.

Kremer coming of an injury, right? Would seem foolish to DFA him unless he completely tanks the rest of the year and his arm is just dead. If there is any chance of him getting back to his 2022-2025 form, then his arbitration salary will be a bargain for a team who doesn't have a ton of SP depth. Really just seems like Home Runes are way up. Walks are fine, Strikeouts are better than normal, a few more hits but not eggregiously so. I'd be suprised if he doesn't turn it around.

2.31 ERA for the season of you take out his two worst outings. Strikes out of a ton of gus and not bad on walks.

Yet tops in the AL in runs.

Probably let Jackson go if they need to. Can send Gray and Roden down before that, though

Per Fangraphs, 13, 34 and 47 prospects.

Kinda the price you pay for top RP. Won't realize if it was a good or bad trade for a few years.

The reliever they got has 3 more years of control. Wasn't just. A rental

Lol. I won't bet much.

I bet we get Neto and Detmers

Why I said as a start. Assumed it would take more.

Teams calling Blue Jays about Jose Siriano now. Wouldn't that be hilarious.