The tangent about positions other than pitcher will deserve discussion about getting a DH when it becomes a perceived problem. The DH for pitchers wasn't an anomaly thrust upon the game in the 1970s out of nowhere. The idea for a DH dates back to at least the 1930s. That was back when men were still men and pitchers were expected to be complete ballplayers like everyone else. Except.... they weren't. It was well accepted that major league pitchers would be terrible hitters, with few exceptions, and because their role was so important the manager would just live with that. When all managers put the best-throwing pitchers into the lineup, with no regard to their hitting ability, the die was cast. It was already an unbalanced position within the game. The DH just made it official, four decades later, and corrected a perceived problem with lack of offense in games. If and when managers universally put in weak-hitting catchers as their starters, and no amount of differential between a good-hitting catcher will win him a spot, then another DH could be considered. Ditto for shortstops, or any other position on the field. Until such time, it's a bit of a strawman to bring up. There's no slippery slope.