Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    40,784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    462

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. Those article are coming soon - when players report to camp. All of the Twins will be injury-free for the first time in years, and they all will be reporting In The Best Shape Of Their Life™. Every single one. Enjoy reading about it.
  2. Yeah. You can find relievers that way. Problem is the opportunity cost and the time it takes (measured in seasons) to sift through the candidates. By the time you have identified a few, some of them are approaching free agency and you need to deal them away or lose them. In effect you're doing the rich clubs' dirty work - they skim off the cream of the crop and you repeat the process. Life as a bottom feeder team isn't glamorous.
  3. Here is a free idea for a Satire by RandBalls Stu. An opinion piece titled:
  4. He even had the TJS already - he'd fit right in.
  5. I want to add another snippet from Falvey's remarks in the article, because it hits hard for me. My two grown sons and I flew in from our respective corners of the continent to attend that series. I can only echo Derek's description. It was electric for us. A Twins memory I'll take to the grave. Derek says he'll never forget that; why weren't the Pohlads similarly moved? It absolves Falvey or Rocco of nothing, to say that ownership punted it all away when they right-sized.
  6. Were these quotes taken from a Bobby Nightengale column in the Strib a week ago? If not, where did the quotes come from? I presume TD didn't get an exclusive sit-down with the pitcher. Is providing attributions not a thing anymore?
  7. Pitchers probably have the arm for this position too .... range and hit-tool another story of course.
  8. A welcome to a new member. Welcome, new member! 😁
  9. In any normal version of reality, the Pohlads would have found a suitable buyer last year, decided that the price they were receiving was what the market would bear, and closed the deal. The new owners would have thanked Derek Falvey for his years of service to the franchise, but stated that they wanted to see the team move in a new direction, and brought in their own person for the big chair. The new PBO (of whatever title) would have thanked Rocco Baldelli for his years of service to the franchise, but stated that a new atmosphere was needed in the dugout and in the clubhouse, and brought in their own person to manage the team. The Twins, naturally, have performed these steps in precisely the opposite order.
  10. I don't know, "Tom" in MN - ask the rest of your Pohlad clan what they have in mind. j/k Welcome to the site.
  11. Zoll's first press conference should be interesting. I don't recall anything until now telling me that he's ready for prime time. Nothing in the other direction either - he's been mainly a pleasant behaving cipher. Now it's go time for him, and the franchise.
  12. Got any tips on lottery numbers to pick, while you are on a roll?
  13. Maybe the Dodgers are in the market for another assistant executive and Rocco can put in a good word for him.
  14. The speech he gave in Waseca was probably his undoing. Or was that the other guy I'm thinking of...
  15. That's my working theory also. Some small disagreement between Falvey and ownership escalated, lines were drawn in the sand, and next thing you know it's "You can't quit me, I fire!" That hypothesis will be discarded as soon as we learn further. 😁
  16. "Be careful what you wish for, you may get it." Strap in and buckle up, fans.
  17. I was hoping an actual Spanish speaker would explain, but absent that, I believe that because the letter 'J' is ordinarily aspirated* ('Juan') similar to an English 'H', then if someone wishes to name their child with the sound we are familiar with (sounding roughly like 'Dj' in some renderings), they include the 'h' after the 'J'. This is difficult to get across in writing and would be simpler face-to-face. But as an example, if you recall hearing our recently traded closer Jhoan Duran's name mentioned in broadcasts, it wasn't "Yo-hann" or similarly, it was more like "Joe-hann". That's what the 'h' does. Pereda's parents must have wanted his name pronounced about like Johnny is in English, so they included the 'h' so that people wouldn't guess and say "Yonny" or "Honny" or similar. I'm not 100% certain and if someone who knows wants to correct this explanation, I'd love to know. * I checked my understanding using ChatGPT and it tells me to say "voiceless velar fricative." I'm sure that will aid in everyone's understanding 😁
  18. Especially with his September BABIP at an astronomical .464. A return of that stat to his established norm close to .300 means that the month was likely a blip.
  19. Welcome to the world of MLB economics, where player salaries are held artificially low for 6 seasons, give or take. Even with arbitration rights, Jeffers is drawing a salary lower than he could command from the highest bidder. So the salaries of the two players are apples-and-oranges. It's not nonsensical; it's regrettable that the team needed to do this. $7M isn't a princely sum for a major leaguer, but if the Twins are paying it for a backup player then it qualifies as the Failure Tax for not having developed another catcher the normal way who would draw a minimum salary. Jeffers is a win for the organization's drafting and development, but he's the only win in the catching department. That's the issue, not Caratini himself, or who backs up whom for the price.
  20. That's not Pereda. If the Twins prefer one catcher's athletic stylings over the other, and paid the price of a very marginal prospect, I'm okay with that. I'm glad if they got anything at all for Eeles. That's not to say I have a whole lot of confidence in the FO's talent assessment. But I don't have an independent insight telling me that Pereda is Jackson's equal. So I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. They got Pereda for nothing, off the waiver wire, except the cost of his salary to be on the 26-man roster. Then they turn around and sell his services for a non-zero amount of cash. On the small, granular scale, I consider that a positive outcome. On the bigger scale, it annoys the hell out of me that they waste whatever limited FO resources on engineering these "wins."
  21. If so, they will do it cheaply. The way he was acquired in the first place.
×
×
  • Create New...