ashbury

Wasn't Nunez acquired by trade, not waiver claim (assuming that's what you meant)?

Nunez The Consummate Thrill Seeker is wasting his talents in baseball and should be in politics.

Sano made a nice play today charging a slow roller. Later in the same scrimmage he over-ran a sharply struck grounder to his left. Similar to a recent game with the big squad, actually. At the moment he's a mixed bag on defense, and I am anticipating an unpleasant reception if he's brought up and messes up a few.

I rotated through the three games that were going on and I didn't notice him anywhere.

Funny you mention that. I stayed behind in FTM and watched the minor leaguers scrimmage among themselves. Someone in the A-level game beat out a muffed grounder. TK sitting on the bench cheered and then hollered out "run 'em out - you never know."

He didn't keep it under enough control to prevent the runner starting from first to reach third. Wound up costing the lead. He also didn't quite run the bases well enough to score in the bottom of the ninth. Little things that happened to add up in that one ST game.

I found a version of the study in the meantime. There, the writer stated the reason: Many prospects showed up on multiple lists, but I counted each occurrence of the player because my goal is to measure the performance of rankings as opposed to the players. Fair enough; if a ranker keeps ranking the same guy year after year, it reflects on the ranking. But he's pretty explicit in saying it's not meant to reflect on the players.

I just phrased it differently. I was not happy when the signing was announced.

This makes me curious about their methodology. Otherwise, where do potential Ace types even come from? Mostly unheralded guys? I wonder for instance if they just added up prospect "counts" for those 14 years, thereby multiply counting the ones who are busts and only seeing relatively briefly the aces who get called up quickly? Kershaw for instance made the BA top 100 list "only" twice. Mussina just once. The bums.

An interesting trade possibility - for some other team. The Twins don't need yet another slash-DH type. You can only have about two guys on any given roster where you go in saying "if nothing else, we can DH him". That's what we say already about Arcia, Pinto, Hunter, Vargas. At least Willingham is out of the equation. Enough.

Low-leverage reliever, just like it was in San Diego. 10th or 11th man on a 12-man staff.

I was sitting in the upper area near home plate on the third base side, and to me the ball seemed to arrive while Nunez was still at least a couple of steps away. Was there a problem with how the tag was applied? I didn't even notice controversy, it seemed like everyone just walked off the field. Maybe I was guilty of making assumptions, since Nunez was trying to score on a base hit that wasn't deep at all; even Revere could have made that throw. (On two hops.)

In Bill Smith's gluteus maximus. I'm not volunteering to retrieve them.

It didn't look terribly heads-up on his part, but if he had immediately headed for third he could well have been thrown out by a lot, as the ball hadn't really trickled away very far and the center fielder (I think it was) was pretty alertly on the scene already. Of course on the ensuing scratch single he ended up thrown out by a lot at home, on a reasonable baserunning decision by the coach, so maybe it's pick your poison. A Cardinal baserunner, I forget who, made a worse decision to not go to third on a weak throw by Farris (replacing Hunter in right). Things even out.

My wife and I attended today's game. We didn't get back until tonight because finally went to see Birdman at the local cineplex. My game writeup is on my blog; I didn't take many photos but at the moment can't upload any of them for some reason. http://twinsdaily.com/blog/159/entry-6374-spring-training-game-number-11-versus-st-louis/

I had the pleasure of watching today's game in person at Hammond Stadium, versus the portion of the St Louis Cardinal roster they deemed worth putting on a bus (hint: no stars). This writeup ought to be pretty quick, because it's one of those rare games where the box score plus a little inference pretty much tells you all you need to know. But first, I'll mention that we didn't have tickets to start with, and didn't want to feed the scalpers - but a little bird had told us that tickets get freed up just before most games - seats that are controlled by the two teams (for players' relatives etc) until they are sure they aren't needed. So we got there 2.5 hours early and waited half an hour, and sure enough we wound up getting $29 seats nearly behind home plate on the third base side up near the top. Seems high priced for spring games but the world is like that now. Just a little tip for those of you wanting to attend games. Kyle Gibson was as good as his line score would suggest - batters were not able to distinguish his offspeed offerings and were getting fooled by them. Two hits, no runs, four strikeouts, in four innings. A little shaky in the third, followed up by a strong fourth. Very hopeful sign. I've not been a strong proponent of Tim Stauffer when the news broke that the Twins had signed him, and nothing today improved my view on him. He got through his first inning with no drama and three ground balls, but his next two innings showed he was no mystery to the Cardinal batters and they piled up four Very Earned Runs in that span. I thought it was silly to envision him as a competitor for the fifth starter spot - now put him back in low-leverage situations like the Padres had him, is my advice. The rest of the game was your usual parade of relievers, who did OK but nothing great, allowing two more runs in total. The last run was aided by some shoddy left field work by Nunez who allowed an extra base by not being able to decide whether to dive for a flare or not, winding up letting it drop but then not corralling the ball to keep the baserunner from getting to third, whereupon he scored on a sac fly. Bad luck to Fien I guess, but he did allow the first hit legitimately. This run was the one that tied it at 6-6, which was the eventual final score. Conversely the Twins scored 5 early runs, three in the third capped by a Brian Dozier two-run homer to left following a Schafer RBI, and two more in the fourth that drove off starter Carlos Martinez when Suzuki doubled down the third base line. Nice. After that the Card bullpen was effective, though they let in another run in the seventh when Herrmann drove in Argenis Diaz. (I was surprised to see Herrmann playing first after Mauer was lifted, so I guess they really are grooming him to be super-sub, and thus likely to be the 25th man on Opening Day.) Twins fans at Hammond today were outnumbered by Cardinal fans. They were courteous but toward the end of the game the repeated rallies had them cheering their favorites on, and the Twins fans were too "Minnesota Nice" (I guess) to put up much of a fuss. The game ended on Nunez being thrown out at the plate trying to score on a short single to left, having been waved in by coach Glynn. With 2 out and weak hitters now in the lineup it was the obvious call for the situation, as all choices at that point had become low percentage and this was the most entertaining one to try. I saw it as him being out by at least two steps, leaving matters at 6-6, and it being Spring they did not go to extras. Everyone departed in a good mood - perhaps as in soccer, a "friendly" played to a tie.

Especially now that games are underway in Ft Myers.

Or this:

Mention Twins Daily to whomever you chat with, and who knows, maybe you'll find out you're talking to a fellow member.

If you asked them, they'll probably say "I'd be most comfortable in the Twin Cities to start the season."

Shhh! Kids these days haz the interwebs, you know.

http://www.banknotesindustries.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/JeffFrancoeurIsBlind.jpg My guess is he's opening his hips too soon and robbing himself of power as a result, but maybe Parker can do an in-depth analysis. Oh, and the Jorge Reyes video has to be viewed at least yearly.

Wrong choice, my friend.

As it happens I too refrained from adding my own disclaimer that I know it's hard to come up with perfect comparisons. If the more elaborate footwork helps him hold up on embarrassments like that one example, it's all to the good. Since it's a few microseconds longer to develop, though, I wonder if it gives the pitcher a chance to disrupt his timing even more. Pitchers aren't known for cooperating with a batter's timing. And I've heard it said that one man's timing mechanism is another man's hitch in his swing.

I love the nuts-and-bolts discussions Parker provides and the animations are great, but this pair of animations seem like apples and oranges. The leg-kick is indeed a nice looking swing (to my untrainable eyes ) on an inside fastball. But the toe-tap one looks like it was on a pitch he was somewhat fooled on - a bit offspeed maybe and outer half of the plate and he was way out in front and possibly intending to pull but had to change plans and couldn't hold up. No swing is going to look good if that's the circumstance. Pitch recognition would be an equally high priority to fix that swing which maybe only occurred because he had two strikes on him.