-
Posts
2,091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
News
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Fire Dan Gladden
-
What does it say about how the Twins view of their AAA pitchers that they felt they needed to bring in DeSclafani to begin with? Yes, home fans tend to overvalue their prospects. Not just in Minnesota. Fans need to be open to the possibility that there is not a lot faith (current faith) that the AAA pitching prospects are MLB ready. There are a few FA SP out there that would improve this team. Even lower end guys like Odorizzi is a step up. Short of a MiLB prove-it contract, nothing will happen here. I would rather they make another trade.
- 84 replies
-
- jake odorizzi
- rich hill
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bring on the "he's blocking prospect <insert name here>" comments,,, He is basically MAT with a lesser glove and a better plate approach (lower K totals).
- 56 replies
-
- manuel margot
- noah miller
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Anthony DeSclafani Will Sink(er) Swim
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Greggory Masterson's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
You are right... Rich Hill is probably the one flier that worked. How about this: Dylan Bundy Aaron Sanchez JA Happ Matt Shoemaker Andrew Albers Throw in Lance Lynn as well (though he sucked more because he didn't care or try). Teams that try to win do not throw innings at these types of guys. -
Anthony DeSclafani Will Sink(er) Swim
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Greggory Masterson's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
This is not a starting pitcher that should be in the rotation of a world series contending team. Are we back to the days of Rich Hill? -
I am not trying to get too far away from the Brooks Lee discussion, but he falls under the AAA unknown. To your point, You are not doing this with teams that should be competing for the title. This team was close last year and upper brass has made the purposeful decision to make this team weaker this year than stronger. What "depth" are you referring to? The Twins have either moved or let go all of the proven depth. The "depth" this year is unproven minor leaguers. If that doesn't scare you right now, I don't know what will. Be optimistic, but be honest in your assessment. You can argue the bullpen is strong, but considering the year-to-year volatility of relievers, I am a more bearish than most.
-
Half the flipping team is an x-factor this year: Correa, Buxton, Vasquez - will they bounce back? Julien, Lewis, Wallner - will they hit sophomore slumps or continue to improve? Kiriloff - can he stay healthy enough to secure a permanent role? Santana - can he fight off father time another year? Kepler - which version are we going to get this year? Paddack - Is he back to form following surgery? <insert AAA player here> - can they contribute at the major league level? The main problem is that the Twins need 90% of these things to go right to be successful this year...
-
3 True Lies From the Twins Offseason
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Cody Christie's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
For quite a few years I have been extremely optimistic heading into Spring Training and the season. Understanding the constraints the FO has worked under, it always felt like the Twins were either working to improve or actually improving. Signings and trades made in an effort to improve the team. This is the first time in a long time I am absolutely disgusted by the way the offseason was handled. Coming off a team that had World Series hopes in 2023 and potential WS expectations heading into 2024, the Admin used the TV contract situation to cut payroll knowing full well they would be getting most, if not all of that back before the season started. Then pocketing that money when it came in, despite promising to use a percentage of income for player payroll. This team is easily 5-7 games worse this year in a division that is the worst in baseball. We all know the Pohlads are directing the FO on the finances, so the FO gets somewhat of a pass on this, but this whole situation smells of 2000-era contraction garbage. This is one fan the team will have to work harder to appease this year.- 108 replies
-
- derek falvey
- cory provus
- (and 4 more)
-
How Far Has the Twins Rotation Fallen?
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I am just going on what every publication I have read says. In reality, both the SP4 and SP5 are essentially up for grabs.- 79 replies
-
- sonny gray
- kenta maeda
- (and 5 more)
-
How Far Has the Twins Rotation Fallen?
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Dan Gladden needs to be fired. I do feel the Twins will struggle to be .500 this year. Varland is not penciled into the rotation, Descalfini is. Although, neither of them have shown anything to earn a spot in an MLB rotation. I would take last year's rotation again this year every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Gray will probably see a small regression but will still be strong, Maeda is just solid.- 79 replies
-
- sonny gray
- kenta maeda
- (and 5 more)
-
How Far Has the Twins Rotation Fallen?
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
So basically your gains are Buxton (hope he is healthy), Paddack (hope he performs), Santana (hope age doesn't catch him), Topa (hope he repeats last year as he has never done that), Julien (hope he doesn't see a sophomore slump), Kepler (hope for a second half repeat)... Thank you for confirming what I said.- 79 replies
-
- sonny gray
- kenta maeda
- (and 5 more)
-
How Far Has the Twins Rotation Fallen?
Fire Dan Gladden replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
As things stand today, the fWAR projection drop of only 2 seems incredibly optimistic. The Twins SP have 1 high end starter, two middle-of-the road starters, and a whole lot of unproven pitchers and wishful thinking. Losing Gray and Maeda was bad enough, but replacing them with nothing (Paddack is nothing until he proves it) should scare everyone. Let's get this straight: Twins losses: Gray Maeda Pagan Polanco Taylor Gains: Santana A few bullpen guys (DeSclafini is not a gain) Everything else is the same from last year. How can anyone expect this team to be anywhere near as good as last year?- 79 replies
-
- sonny gray
- kenta maeda
- (and 5 more)
-
At the moment, there is really only one non-pitching spot available on the roster (looking at you Larnach). SP is very scary at the moment, with 2 spots basically wide open. Ober will be given many opportunities, but he is not a 100% lock by any means. The pen is pretty much set, with Staumont the only question mark. This team is markedly worse than last year. 2023 Twins drastically underperformed due to many position players underperforming. Even if Correa, Buxton, and Vasquez rebound, the rotation has 3 spots built on inexperience and/or hope. As bad as the division is, .500 is optimistic.
- 92 replies
-
- byron buxton
- edouard julien
- (and 5 more)
-
Respectfully you are arguing two points here: As a 5th pick, that is sunk cost. You have expectations for that type of pick. Whether they are met or not is up to the player. As a 5th pick in the draft, he did very little to live up to expectations: below average defender, not good enough offensively to hold a position. His draft spot had no impact on whether he succeeded or not as a player. As a player, he had 400 decent at-bats and then failed miserably. You can look at Kennys Vargas and Jose Miranda as similar comps for the moment. Is there yet time for him to make a decent career for himself? Sure, but he is on his last legs, possibly his last opportunity. If the Twins felt he would be productive, they would have kept him over Castro. As a Twin, his chances for making the team this year were extremely low, a very strong DFA candidate. To get anything of value for this type of player can only be identified as a win.
- 33 replies
-
- nick gordon
- steven okert
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Gordon was a bust before this trade was made. Happened before, will happen again. At this point it was a "get what you can" situation.
- 33 replies
-
- nick gordon
- steven okert
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Gordon was a DFA candidate. The fact they got anything of value for him makes this a Twins win.
- 33 replies
-
- nick gordon
- steven okert
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Regardless of the Royals actions, the Twins and Twins Fandom should all be embarrassed by this offseason. The fact that the Royals, who were/are basically in the same limbo as the Twins and it did not stop them from making moves basically makes Ownership look selfish and short-sighted. Very, very sad...
-
Would not surprise me in the least to see an extension or a re-sign at the end of the year. I would have no problem with a 2/25-30 deal. That is the going rate for starting OF. Complain about his performance all you want, but that its what he is. If the Twins had confidence that there was somebody in the wings to replace him in RF, Kepler would already be traded.
- 68 replies
-
- max kepler
- jorge polanco
- (and 4 more)
-
Kepler has higher value to the Twins at the moment as there is no true successor in the wings. Kepler will be your starting RF on opening day. Depending on how the season goes, he may be a deadline trade candidate. Of course this goes all out the window if the Twins continue to not care about winning this season...
-
I am ok with the limbo aspect of this process. We are not privy to all of the restrictions and rules placed on the Twins during the bankruptcy process, there could be many reasons why things went the way the went. I am not ok with the Twins screaming "no tv contract means no spend" when there was zero doubt by anyone there would be some contract in place for this season and the money that goes along with it. I have been yelling this for months, it is an extremely bad look for the Twins and a horrible approach for this fan base that had been expecting the Twins to be WS contenders this year, only to have the carpet pulled out from under them. This is so reminiscent of the late 90's/contraction nonsense...
-
This. The Twins approach this offseason should anger every Twins fan. To take a WS contending team and let it fall apart due solely to save money that they annually promise to spend on payroll is extremely disappointing. I have generally been a supporter of this administration over the last few years. They aren't perfect, but you always felt they were trying to win. This is the first year that it feels like they do not care about the product and only care about money. I am having a very hard time getting excited for this season.

