Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

rv78

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,911

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by rv78

  1. rv78
    Sure, it worked for Rocco in this game, but if it hadn't would you still be happy with the move? Maybe Rocco made a mistake, (possibly and very likely). Why use Jax in the 7th? Were Alcala, Okert, and Sands still exhausted from their 2 combined innings pitched on Saturday that 1 of them couldn't pitch the 7th? Maybe that would have been the smarter move thus saving Jax for the 8th and Duran for the 9th. My point of view is, Rocco used Duran in the 8th to cover for the mistake he made by using Jax in the 7th.
  2. rv78
    " The Marlins’ side of the deal will take time to develop, but the Twins must be happy with how the initial trade played out. If nothing else, it's a good sign that they're not already considering another one. " Who's not already considering another one? How do you know? If it's the Twins, anyone could be moved at the trade deadline outside of Buck and Correa who have no trade clauses. Not having a batting champion to trade only means the return won't be as good but I'd bet if the right offer came along it will be considered if it hasn't already.
  3. rv78
    Wasn't going to comment other than my short LOL on page 1 but I just can't get past the lunacy of signing players like Gallo, Santana and Margot and the trading for injured pitchers that happens WAY to often. Add in the acquisition of 1 year wonders like JLopez, and the crop of bullpen arms they went after this off-season and IMO they take too many chances on players that have no consistant track record. Last but not least is the spreadsheet culture and platoon to death or pinch-hit at all costs avenue they have committed to that doesn't really equate into anything but inconsistancy on the field. Do you know how to have players never learn how to hit against an opposite handed pitcher? ....... By never giving them enough opportunities to do so.
  4. rv78
    LOL!!
  5. rv78
    Margot has a $12 million team option for next year that the Twins won’t pick up. For now, he needs to find a way to provide some value, or there is no reason for him to be on the roster. Is there a reason why Buxton is on the roster? Other than his contract that will last for another 5 seasons, there is NO reason.
  6. rv78
    Byron Buxton, Hurt, Again This season the Twins have benefitted by having their star center fielder play in 28 of their first 30 games. He has routinely been available in the outfield, and while his process has been a bit amiss at the plate, he has found a way to make a significant contribution in the form of an early 0.6 fWAR. The reason why this news is only worth 2 sentences is because it has become an expected occurance every season. It's not really news at all when it happens every season.
  7. rv78
    It's great to beat up on the two worst teams in the AL, but that only means you could still be the 3rd worst team in the AL. I'll start believing when they start beating good teams.
  8. rv78
    Your enthusiasm is good to see, however in the 8 years this FO has been in charge they've developed 1 pitcher that has been good enough to crack the rotation and stay there, Ober. We can name numerous players that were in the pipeline a few years ago, just like you are naming the ones there now and none of them made it like we were told they would. Where's Duran?.. now a reliever, how about Balazovic? Or Hendrick or Canterino or Winder just to name a few. Maybe they aren't as good at drafting as you think they are or they'd have more players making an impact verses acquiring injured pitchers (which is a whole nother story) to cover for their mistakes.
  9. rv78
    Like a blind squirrel finding an acorn once in a while, the Falvine approach of "all or nothing" worked this time. Larnach's and Buck's HR's saved them.
  10. rv78
    If Varland is so good in the bullpen then use him that way. If Sands is good in the bullpen then use him that way. Let SWR start the game, go 3 innings and turn it over to the bullpen and those 2 good long relief guys just named. In theory you can say it is a bullpen game. Sounds like an automatic win since the Twins have the "best bullpen" in the majors. LOL! Now if they can only play the WSox everyday, their hitting problem is solved.
  11. rv78
    I wonder why they think they have to bring in players that can hit lefties or players that can hit righties...? Why not go after players that can hit both? I wonder why they think they can add veterans like Gallo and Santana who are clearly at the end of their careers and expect one more good season from them...? There really was only 1 Nellie Cruz. Quit trying to duplicate him with other players. I understand the need for depth. I know they got burned by NOT having it when they had to play guys like Jake Cave and Giberto Celestino, but if you don't see the difference of talent you have in depth at AAA now verses what you did in 2021 then you aren't very good at evaluating talent. All you have to do is look back to the last half of 2023 to see who really carried this team to the playoffs and it wasn't your veteran depth but the young players. Not trusting the players you drafted to become the depth pieces you need shows no confidence in them and gives yourself no credibility that you are drafting good players. Then finally, and probably the most disturbing issue of all, is the redundant acquisition of injured pitchers. Have the guts to say no if a pitcher isn't healthy.
  12. rv78
    Partly right, and partly wrong. The FO spent money on the likes of an injured DeSclafani, a washed up Santana, a no name hitter called Margot. Decided to go with another year of Max Kepler who has never shown any consistancy as a hitter. $10M for a backup catcher, (Vazquez), was foolish to say the least, not to mention the 1 year wonder relief pitchers they splurged on. Easily could have used that money more wisely. Varland looks to be a AAA pitcher for life. Paddack is being counted on to give 'em a full season coming off TJ surgey, which usually takes that first full season to recover from. Add Duarte to the injured pitchers acquired list, which only grows longer every flippin year. Thielbar looks like age has finally caught up with him. Correa and Buxton, their two highest paid hitters can't stay on the field and if they do, can't hit more than their weight the majority of the time. Yes, they did cut payroll, but where they have spent the money was an even bigger waste and mistake. Now they must live with it. As a fan you can choose NOT to go to Target Field or watch the disaster on the field they so proudly constructed since they are the "smartest guys in the room".
  13. rv78
    Disagree with you Doc. This team is exactly what it is... bad. Who's to blame? The FO, the Manager and the Coaches. Why? Their approach to everything they do. You aren't going to win when you acquire injured pitchers, 1 year wonders, and washed up veterans. Then throw in the all or nothing swing at the plate and they are getting exactly what they want. Right now that is nothing. Add a Manager that plays the lefty/righty matchups to death, which only shows, no confidence in your players to be good except in a situation that was determined by their past and not the present gives any hitter little to no incentive to try. I could just see Kirby, Herbie and G-Man getting pulled in the middle of a game. The boo-birds would have been flying. Only way things will change is when they clean house starting at the top.
  14. rv78
    The Minnesota Twins sought to snap a five-game skid on Saturday, and Bailey Ober did everything he could to position them well for it. The offense remained in a sputter, and while opportunities were missed all day, Rocco Baldelli's club did just enough to get the job done. Despite Rocco doing this: Baldelli went with Carlos Santana off the bench. A weak fly out dropped him to 0-for-14 on the year with runners in scoring position, and he has just three hits in his last 40 at bats (.075). Manuel Margot grounded out on the first pitch of his pinch hit at-bat, and both runners were left on the bases. Why play the pinch-hitting game, especially with 2 hitters that aren't hitting? There's no sense in his head.
  15. rv78
    Ignorance is contagious.
  16. rv78
    Most of those situatuions are based on career numbers. Not based on current performance, which is needed on a daily basis. Example: Julien has good numbers verses RHP but this year is hitting lefties better. So what does Rocco do? He puts him in the leadoff spot against righties and bats him 9th against lefties. That is NOT Managing based on how the player is doing. It's based on what he has done in the past. They aren't playing games from the past. Sorry, that's NOT good managing no matter how you try to twist it.
  17. rv78
    Unfortunately, they can play poorly and still beat the WhiteSox, so nothing will change.
  18. rv78
    Your sentence is too long.... It should be............. Rocco still can't manage.
  19. rv78
    This is quite hilarious when you consider that these numbers would be huge improvements for Buxton and Kepler, who have been everyday players, (when healthy) for 9 years on the Twins. Just goes to show how low the Twins bar is.
  20. rv78
    You shouldn't blame the injuries when you load your team with players that can play multiple positions and fill in for players that get injured. Which is exactly what they do/did. IMHO, I think ownership just doesn't care about winning. The FO, Rocco and his coaches, have a free pass because ownership doesn't care, as long as they make money. The only way things will change is if/when we get new Owners who actually want to win and that won't happen as long as fans keep supporting the current product on the field. Is anyone really satisified and happy with the additions they made this off-season to a playoff type team? If you are, why? They improved nothing and actually went backwards. They'll make excuses, such as the TV deal and the injuries, and a player or two regressed that they didn't expect, but even good teams have injuries and players that regress and they still play "good" baseball, unlike what we are seeing from this team. How good are they really at evaluating talent? Why sign guys like Gallo last year and Santana and Margot this year? They aren't good. Then they give precedent to them at the start of the season over guys like Kirilloff, Miranda and Martin. If Simeon Woods Richardson is not good enough to make the opening day roster then how did he pitch a great game against Detroit? No, his spot first belonged to DeSclafani who couldn't even make it through spring training and now Varland who belongs in the pen or AAA. I'm telling you, the guys in charge of this team are a joke. Period.
  21. rv78
    #1. I'd dump the lefty/righty matchups when setting the musical chairs lineup. Why? I can answer that with questions...... How's it working so far? Is Santana going 0 fer 4 against a lefty pitcher really better than playing Kirilloff? If Kirilloff does the same, is it any worse? Does slotting Farmer in the cleanup spot when he's hitting .071 the best hitter to put there? Why put Julien in the 9 hole spot verses a lefty pitcher when he is hitting .333 verses lefties yet bat him 1st in the lineup against righties when he's hitting .146? George Brett, who knew something about hitting said it best........ hitting is all about getting comfortable and to get comfortable, playing everyday in the same place on the field and in the lineup works best. Rocco's approach is the exact opposite.
  22. rv78
    That's Rocco for ya.
  23. rv78
    That's a Rocco move for ya.
  24. rv78
    Decisions, decisons..... let's have our main roster players play minimal time during spring training so they don't get injured.......... Result..... they aren't ready for the start of the season...... and...... they still get injured. Hmmm.... How's the "all or nothing" approach at the plate working out? Hmmm.... How's Rocco's incessant and relentless lefty/righty matchups working? It's complete idiocy to have 1 of your players who is ACTUALLY hitting the ball (Kirilloff) sit the bench in favor of a guy (Santana) who's hitting .114 on the season. I saw this coming a mile away. Doesn't matter who's hitting and who's not, Rocco goes with his matchups and the good/hot player rides the bench. I mean, it's not like they need the offense, this team is scoring runs at will.... LOL! They got lucky and won the division last year despite Rocco's bad decisions. The competition within the division isn't going to be so easy this year.
  25. rv78
    I get lambasted on this site every time I mention how BAD Rocco is, yet almost every post here is a comment on his poor managing. Nothing will change until the Front Office, the Manager and his coaches are gone. Don't like his platoon to death style? Too bad. Don't like his pull a starter before 3 times facing a certain player?, Too bad. Don't like him burning up his closer in a 2 run deficit game? Too bad. Don't like him throwing games away? Too bad. Now why the Twins can't hit? Because they trade away HITTERS and try to win with BOMBERS, washed up veterans and replacement level backup types that other teams let go. Good job FO.
×
×
  • Create New...