Jump to content
Can the Twins take down the NL-best Brewers this afternoon? Join our game thread! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    32,519

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. Brock Beauchamp
    Yeah, while we were all gnashing our teeth over the pen, it's possible it turned into an acceptable pitching unit... Though obviously, it would have been nice to see this happen in mid-July when the Twins were well over .500. I don't have many concerns about the pen any more. I think it'll be good enough to get the job done, though I don't have a lot of faith in it becoming above average any time soon.
  2. Brock Beauchamp
    100% agreed. It makes no sense for Sano to take a ten year deal. If he hits FA, he'll want to do it at 29/30, not 32/33.
  3. Brock Beauchamp
    Yeah, exactly. Maybe it's not too late but the Twins are fighting to catch the remaining playoff spot (the second WC spot). A month ago, they owned the first WC spot.
  4. Brock Beauchamp
    Yeah, this. It's a fine move but it irritates me Ryan didn't start patching the pen in early July.
  5. Brock Beauchamp
    I hear stuff like this about Vielma but is he really that much better than Gordon? I'm not arguing, it's an honest question.
  6. Brock Beauchamp
    Last night was a perfect opportunity to ignore a stat line and test a young pitcher's mettle by sending him into the eighth in a blowout game. Duffey scuffled a bit and that's okay. Hopefully he learned from the experience.
  7. Brock Beauchamp
    Reply hazy, try again later. That's my take on Duffey right now. His MiLB numbers were decent but far from eye-popping. He was drafted out of college but never thrived at missing bats. He has shown to be very good at preventing the walk, which is necessary from a college guy who doesn't have overpowering stuff. In short, it's hard to say. Right now, his only plus pitch is that nasty curve. The rest of his stuff is pretty pedestrian (but under the tutelage of Allen, one can hope that change will improve). Will hitters adjust and spot the curve coming out of his hand as film is compiled on Tyler? Only time will tell, I suppose.
  8. Brock Beauchamp
    A fair point. I know I kick myself for sitting on money for too long and investing later than I should have invested.
  9. Brock Beauchamp
    It's only two starts but Duffey has already exceeded my admittedly low expectations by a wide margin. I hope he continues to prove me wrong(ish). I was never really down on Duffey, I simply didn't care and didn't expect much from him.
  10. Brock Beauchamp
    True. I suppose there is a possibility of that, though I think it's unlikely. Given Sano's young age, he can take the financial security today and still hit the free agent market as a 29/30 year old. That's kind of the best of both worlds for him.
  11. Brock Beauchamp
    Holy ****. I just logged into MLB.tv. LOL.
  12. Brock Beauchamp
    Ultimately, I don't think it matters. After the absolute steal the Rays got with Longoria, I don't see players giving huge discounts to sign super-early. If Sano signs today, I don't think it's a huge savings over signing him 14 months from now. Maybe $5-10m. Spread out over 5+ years, that's not enough to get worked up about. But I'll be disappointed if the Twins haven't approached Sano by November of 2016 if he continues to produce the way he has thus far.
  13. Brock Beauchamp
    True, but I'd like to see the Twins make a showing by staying ahead of Baltimore and Tampa, two equally flawed teams.
  14. Brock Beauchamp
    Rainy days always get me down. (and Mondays)
  15. Brock Beauchamp
    The problem with your analysis is that you're not taking into account three things, all revolving around A-Rod: 1. He was 25 years old when he became a free agent, which is absurdly young. 2. He was nearly a shoe-in for the HoF at age 25. He was that good. Free agents of his ability come around maybe once a decade and almost never at his age. 3. The Rangers went absolutely insane and bid against themselves during negotiations. They had the top two or three offers on the table IIRC. As Markos pointed out, remove A-Rod's special circumstances and you have a much more linear upward graph for the elite players in baseball. To imagine the 2000 A-Rod situation and compare it to a theoretical situation, pretend it's 2017 and Mike Trout is a free agent. He's 25 years old and is coming off yet another 8-9 WAR season. Can you imagine a situation where he doesn't get a 10 year, $350m+ deal in that situation? Stanton got $325m and he's not even close to Trout in ability. Kershaw has a contract that bought out his free agency years at roughly $35m AAV and he's a friggin' pitcher. That was the A-Rod situation in 2000. A-Rod was an outlier that should be removed entirely because he screws up the entire curve, just as this hypothetical Trout would in 2017.
  16. Brock Beauchamp
    I think that's because elite position players stopped hitting the market, not due to any reluctance in offering a $30m a year contract. It's hard to offer Mike Trout a $300m deal when the Mike Trouts of the world get locked up for 8+ years the moment they hit the show. A-Rod was 25 when he signed that monster deal with the Rangers. We simply do not see players of his calibre hit the free agent market at age 25 anymore. Hell, we rarely see them hit the market at age 28 anymore. Who's the best player to switch teams in a monster deal in the past few years? Cano? Sure, he's an elite player but he was 32 years old and he's elite, not legendary... A-Rod was a legendary-type player and was worth ~20 WAR over Cano during their first ten seasons in MLB.
  17. Brock Beauchamp
    Player salaries have eclipsed inflation by several magnitude over the past 40 years.
  18. Brock Beauchamp
    If I'm Sano, I probably avoid a deal that extends beyond age 30. If he continues to be as good as he looks today, getting financial security through his prime seasons - which are controlled anyway - and then looking for the huge payday in his age 29/30 season makes sense. It's a lot easier to get that huge payday as a 30 year old than it is as a 32 year old. Locking Miguel up through arb and then +1/2 free agent seasons seems a reasonable compromise for everyone involved, though I doubt it happens before the end of the 2016 season. If you're a player, do you really care if you get $120m today if you can get $80m and a better shot at $200m when you're 29 or 30?
  19. Brock Beauchamp
    Yes, this. It's like saying Obama doesn't really matter because his advisors are the ones negotiating and forming legislation. For good or bad, the guy at the top gets the credit or blame, if only because he's the one hiring the people doing the daily legwork.
  20. Brock Beauchamp
    While it's exciting to see Buxton play again, the Twins aren't a better team than they were yesterday and are probably a bit worse. Hicks, at the very least, is as good as Buxton will be in the short-term. Probably better.
  21. Brock Beauchamp
    No, but it's fair to think they'll only swap pitcher-for-pitcher on the 40 man.
  22. Brock Beauchamp
    While I normally agree that it's a bad idea to add guys to the 40 man before they need to be added, this is a special situation. The Twins are floundering and they need help. Berrios is their best chance to receive that help. Would anyone here shed a tear if the Twins lost the likes of Logan Darnell?
  23. Brock Beauchamp
    This pretty much sums up my thoughts. I was super-high on the Hughes signing. I questioned the extension and received quite a bit of flak for it. I was moderately high on the Nolasco signing and felt it was necessary at the time. I wasn't entirely on board with the Santana signing because, like you, I wondered exactly how many #3 starters the Twins thought they needed this offseason. In the end, I can't single out any of those deals and say "this was terrible" but when combined, they hamstrung the Twins quite a bit going forward.
  24. Brock Beauchamp
    I'm pretty sure that's against the CBA's rules.
  25. Brock Beauchamp
    Well stated article, John. As I've said before, I've never been as angry with a Twins front office as I am with the 2015 front office. They've had almost countless opportunities to correct course with the bullpen, yet they continually fail and let down a newly expectant fanbase. I hope they're embarrassed about all of this because they should be embarrassed.
×
×
  • Create New...