Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. I see your point but this is only important if the Twins permanently move Sano off third base. If he was 26 or 27, I'd be worried he's done with third forever, a la Michael Cuddyer... But he's only 22 years old. I don't like the idea of moving a 22 year old slugger off-position but I don't think it will kill him, either.
  2. I wanted to see a Plouffe trade explored but after what happened at third this offseason, holding on to him was probably the smart move. Trading a decent player for junk just so you can slide another player into his place isn't a good way to run a franchise.
  3. One thing people tend to forget is that teams finishing a rebuild often resemble a "cobbled mess". Older, decent players are still on the roster, young prospects are fighting for jobs, and very little is certain in the short-term. I wouldn't have built the Twins' roster as it stands today but I won't bash Ryan for it too much, either (not including the bullpen in the latter part of this statement). He's trying to prevent single points of failure (as in promoting a guy like Hicks with no one to back him up if he fails... No big deal on a 69 win team, a much bigger deal on an 81 win team). Most of these "issues" will sort themselves out in the first two months of the season as guys succeed, fail, and get injured.
  4. I expect regression due to BABIP but with those peripherals, he should still post good numbers. And let's not forget how undeveloped Max was and that he's only entering his age 23 season. In 2015, he hit a whopping 47 2B/3B and only 9 HR. There's a good chance as he approaches his mid-20s, those doubles and triples start going over the fence with more frequency.
  5. I could see Kepler spending most, if not all, of 2016 in the minors. It all depends on the play of two players. Byron Buxton: Well, duh. Oswaldo Arcia: If he bounces back at all, he could cement himself into the lineup for the entire season, which pinches Kepler quite a bit. On the other hand, it's possible Rosario regresses in a brutal, painful fashion and we see the two previous players get regular time and Kepler replaces Rosario, not the other two guys.
  6. The Twins need to make a decision with Meyer but last year, they had no good options. They couldn't even keep the guy in the AAA rotation because he was a disaster. They certainly couldn't put him in the MLB rotation. At that point, the only (crappy) option remaining is to let him try to sort things out in the bullpen. We can only hope last year was an aberration for Meyer.
  7. If the Twins "ruined" Meyer, they sure did a roundabout job of it. When the team acquired Meyer, he was ranked #83 by BP. Before the 2015 season, he was ranked #14 by BP. Other lists had similar jumps, though BA stayed consistent with him (#59 in 2013, #62 in 2015). So in essence, people are arguing the Twins first helped the guy before destroying him. This argument is... highly illogical.
  8. While it's a gamble to roll out a "crafty" starter for a prolonged period of time, Milone has pitched 614 innings as a starter, almost entirely in the American League. If teams don't have a solid book on the guy by now, everyone is asleep at the wheel. But I agree with your point to an extent. Milone has little to no wiggle room as a pitcher. If he loses a MPH or feel for a pitch, things won't just go bad... It'll be disastrous. He's Nick Blackburn Redux at that point. Which is part of the reason why I believe he should be traded, even if the return is modest. The other part of my reasoning was mentioned in a previous post... The Twins already have a slew of Milones in the rotation and Tommy is one of the few who might have some trade value.
  9. I'm no Milone fan - I'd like to see him traded - but you're really underselling the guy here. He's lining up as the fifth starter on the team: a 29 year old lefty with a career 99 ERA+ and a 4.30 FIP, 4.22 xFIP. As someone else said, if you're rolling out what looks to be a league-average guy as your fifth starter, you're probably doing okay for yourself. The Mets rolled (literally, rolled) Colon out for 30-ish starts last season and Niese for 30-ish starts. I seem to remember them playing pretty late in the season. We all love upside. I'd prefer to see May in the rotation; I think it's the smart long-term move. But you're not giving Milone the credit he deserves. He is a league average guy on the right side of 30 years old. He's not going to kill the team by taking the mound every fifth day. The problem isn't Tommy Milone (but, again, I'd try to move him), it's the rest of the rotation. Almost everybody is a Tommy Milone in this rotation, though a couple of them don't have Milone's age or handed-ness on their side.
  10. An interesting choice for an MiLB invite but come on, I want to see a real reliever acquisition already...
  11. I think the Twins were banking a bit too hard on Josmil Pinto figuring out his defensive issues. Obviously, that... didn't work out as planned. The Twins were rebuilding. Yeah, it would have been nice to pick up a decent catcher but when the team is winning less than 70 games a season, I'm not sure it matters. Though I question the decision to not pick up more at last year's deadline when it was obvious the Twins were a fringe contender. Picking up Jepsen was nice but a month late. Picking up Cotts was nice but two months late. Failing to address catcher just added to the deadline misery.
  12. Nope. He could be a touch better than he was in 2015 with more rest between games but really, he is who he is. I'm one of the few who didn't think the Suzuki contract was terrible. He was a stopgap catcher when the Twins had literally no depth at the position. But not as a starter. He's a backup.
  13. Because they have a starting catcher that's better, a 22 year old prospect who looks ready for MLB, and because Aaron Hicks was fair value? It's hardly a fair comparison.
  14. Eh, he had a decent year in 2014, though it was only 90 PAs. The guy was rushed to the majors and then didn't get much in the way of playing time. In the little time he has received, he has displayed competence with the bat.
  15. He's far from perfect but at least he's shown some level of competence at the MLB level.
  16. To be fair, it appeared the door on the catcher market slammed shut approximately 2.3 seconds after it opened. Nobody expected Wieters to accept the QO and Pierzynski resigning with Atlanta that quickly was somewhat surprising. Without the recent Padres acquisition, the door would still be mostly closed and nobody in their right mind would have predicted SD picking up another catcher this offseason. Like or dislike the trade, a GM should not be criticized for attempting to shore up the team's biggest problem at a position of extreme scarcity early in the offseason. If he went and picked up three Blaine Boyers in early November, yeah, you absolutely tear a GM to shreds for that move... But not for picking up a catcher when the position is an organizational problem from top to bottom. There are situations where you sit back and let the market unfold before committing to a player... But that situation rarely involves catcher, especially when the catching situation was as bad as it was for the Twins.
  17. Sure, but it means the guy has a long way to go to become a productive MLB player. I have huge concerns about Rosario but at least he put up solid power numbers. If he makes contact, it's good contact. Eddie is also a year younger and is a very good, maybe great, defender. Again, I think Bethancourt is a good project player for a rebuilding team. That doesn't fit with what the Twins are trying to do this season and Bethancourt has to stay on the 25 man roster, as he's out of options.
  18. Last season, Bethancourt swung at 1.7% more pitches than Eddie Rosario. Ouch.
  19. My sentiments as well. On paper, it was a fair trade. Now it's going to take on-field results to determine the winner and loser of the deal (or both could be winners/losers). Not a huge fan of the deal but it's now up to the scouts and players.
  20. That's my biggest problem with the way things *appear* to be shaking out this offseason. I don't want to see Trevor May permanently shifted to the bullpen. I think he has the talent to be a starter. But with Meyer and Burdi in the org, I'm not against the Twins banking on one of them stepping forward at some point in 2016. IMO, they can pick up a RHRP who is only "acceptable" and hope/pray one of those guys dominates out of the gate and gets a promotion. My biggest worry is LHRP.
  21. I know, that's why I'm disappointed... But there are still relievers available and FA is not the only method to acquire a player. It's my personal preferred method but it's not the only way to get it done.
  22. Chris Parmelee and Liam Hendricks disagree that AAA success has a good chance of immediately translating to MLB success. Again, Bethancourt is an interesting reclamation project... But he's not the type of guy you rely on for anything, particularly when your starting catcher is named Kurt Suzuki. That's inviting disaster.
  23. *Looks at the calendar* Yep, still not even mid-December. Ryan has made two significant moves and people are complaining he's not "trying to win" because he didn't make more moves at the winter meetings. I'm as disappointed as anyone about not picking up guys at the meetings but, again, it's not even mid-December yet. There is over a month of solid activity left in this offseason. What is happening right now reminds me of people complaining about ST rosters on March 10th. "Ryan moves too early!" *December 11th rolls around* "The offseason is OVER!"
  24. Not fill it, just find one or two guys. That's not terribly difficult. If the Twins were shopping for 3-5 guys, yeah... That's damned near impossible. But given the plethora of relievers available at any moment and your need of just one or two of them (both don't even have to be great), that's not a particularly tall order to fill. The Twins have two guys locked into the back of the pen - Jepsen and Perkins. May might end up there. I don't like it but it might happen. That's three above average relievers. All you need at that point is one more decent righty and a decent lefty, though a shutdown lefty who can be a one-inning guy would be preferred, obviously.
×
×
  • Create New...