Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. I don't think that's true at all. Beane vastly overpaid for Fuld and most of us felt that way at the time. The performance of each player since the trade has cemented that feeling. Fuld has been a replacement level player for the A's. Milone has been better than that for the Twins. It was a bad trade by Beane, doubly so after the A's collapsed and didn't even make the ALDS last season.
  2. (begins adding multiple dentist appointments to Giles' calendar)
  3. I don't see why not. May as well let him get a taste of flying from city to city instead of busing it. Bonus points if the Twins are still in contention.
  4. One advantage of keeping Kepler in Chatanooga is he gets to play in the Southern League postseason. Does that matter? Dunno, but it's a consideration.
  5. He's quite a bit more athletic than Kubel, even the pre-injury version. IIRC, Kubel never graded out any higher than "mediocre corner outfield defense" while Max has fringy centerfielder potential in the vein of Wil Myers. You don't want him in center but he can probably hold down the position without completely embarrassing himself.
  6. If I'm Terry Ryan, most of the rotation is on the auction block this winter. Nolasco, Santana, Gibson, Milone. Two of those guys are basically unmovable. Gibson is a good pitcher under team control. I'd prefer to keep him but would let him go for the right catcher or prospect. Which leaves Milone. I'd probably try to move him for a prospect. That shouldn't be difficult. He's a career 99 OPS+ guy with several years of control. Something has to give in the rotation and with the amount of mediocre vets under team control/contract, Milone seems the guy most likely to move for something of value while not crippling the 2016 rotation. If you can move Duffey, have at it... But I don't see that happening. That allows you to enter 2016 with Hughes, Nolasco, Santana, Gibson, May. Call up Berrios the moment one of them falters and never look back.
  7. "when he gets mad at a call that to us is saying that son of a buck is competing." I can't do anything but laugh. Right or wrong, that is such a Twins statement to make.
  8. That's easily the most frustrating part of this season. Many of us weren't asking for big changes... Get Oliveros (or somebody) up here in May because it was obvious Boyer was living on borrowed time. Convert one of the Rochester starters into a reliever and get him up here. Make some waiver wire moves or small trades in June because it was obvious the entire bullpen (minus Perkins) was on the verge of collapse. Make a bigger trade in early July and get out in front of the rest of the pack. There were so many options available to the front office, yet they didn't do anything. It's nice the bullpen is finally acceptable. It would have been nice to see it start happening 2-3 months earlier before the Twins handed away the Wild Card spot they had locked down for the better part of two months.
  9. I'm fine with Berrios getting the call now, my post about service time was under the assumption he wouldn't appear with the Twins this season. I believe the Twins denied Jose's request to play winter ball so I suspect they're planning to shut him down relatively soon. I don't think he's going to make an appearance this season.
  10. Well, no matter what the rotation looked like, it'd be nice to keep Jose in Rochester through the middle of April no matter what. That will convert his age 29 season into a team-controlled year. And I believe it's a solid strategy to game the controlled years in that fashion, particularly for pitchers. It's different if you have a guy at third who plays a single position. At some point, you either need to release/bench the existing third baseman and rotate in the new kid. But the rotation? 20% of an MLB roster is the starting rotation. The likelihood of a guy underperforming or getting injured early in the season is high. It's pretty easy to rotate in a kid who you feel is ready at almost any time from mid-April onward. All you need is one guy out of five to have some kind of setback in the early going. That's not only common, it's kinda expected in today's game. And that's not even including the option of bringing a young pitcher up through the bullpen.
  11. This is my feeling as well. They'll give Ricky one more shot and if he stumbles again, I think they'll consider removing him from the roster. When healthy, he's not a great pitcher but he's a serviceable one. Personally, like many Twins fans, I hold nothing but contempt for the guy. I wish he was off the roster but I'm not ready to kick him to the curb for nothing, either.
  12. How is it so different from the NFL, where wild card winners play an extra week while the two top division winners get to rest after a grueling season?
  13. Toronto took the lead over the Rangers in the ninth. The Twins are on the verge of being only half a game out of the WC.
  14. That Sano kid might be a keeper. Time will tell.
  15. I'm not saying it's not a good idea, I'm saying it won't happen because it means everybody involved takes a pay cut. A handful of extra playoff games don't counteract the loss of 120 (!) regular season games.
  16. I don't see baseball cutting back the regular season. Ten games is a lot of butts not in seats, a lot of television ad space not being bought. The same goes for removing divisions. Too many regional rivalries live on through those division matchups. If it costs owners money and provides no tangible benefit for the players and their union, it's not going to happen.
  17. I think adding a third division and the WC were the best things to happen to the sport since the DH.
  18. It's entirely possible, for sure. The Twins also have a handful of September games against teams who are likely playing AAAA chaff or prospects in September. They close out the season against the Royals, who will almost surely be on full-blown autopilot by that point, resting their best players in preparation for the postseason.
  19. I think that's the best part of the WC format. A WC winner shouldn't be on equal footing to a division champion. If they wanted an advantage, they should have won the division. Baseball is a far more level playing field than any other sport. Home field advantage in the playoffs isn't as significant as it is in other sports, as the best teams in baseball only win 60% of their games, maybe 70% of their home games. Giving those better teams a leg up for winning the division helps the best teams advance in the postseason. I think that's a good thing.
  20. I agree making the division more important relative to the WC is a good goal but I disagree with the solution.
  21. It's my opinion the Twins really need 2 of 3 in this series. Teams receive limited opportunities against WC teams outside the division. The Twins need to do all they can with those limited opportunities... And they've done a pretty good job of it lately, at least against the teams they have a chance of catching. Two of three against the Rangers. Four of four against the Orioles. The Twins were never going to catch the Yankees or Jays so I find those series less important, though it would have been nice to accumulate at least one win against those clubs. Argh.
×
×
  • Create New...