Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Minor League Coverage

    4 Twins Prospects Who Should Be Untouchable at the 2026 MLB Trade Deadline

    If Minnesota decides to buy, the front office has enough prospect depth to pursue upgrades without sacrificing the organization's long-term foundation.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of Rob Thompson, St. Paul Saints

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins have hovered around the final American League Wild Card spot, leaving Jeremy Zoll and the front office with a difficult decision as the MLB trade deadline approaches. A strong stretch could justify adding reinforcements for a postseason push, while a cold streak could force a more conservative approach.

    If the Twins do decide to buy, they'll undoubtedly lean on one of baseball's deepest farm systems to acquire immediate help. That's the advantage of last year's trade deadline selloff and another strong draft class. Minnesota has the prospect capital to make meaningful additions. However, not every prospect should be on the table.

    Championship organizations know the difference between using prospect depth to improve the present and sacrificing the players who are expected to define the future. Minnesota has several prospects who should be considered off-limits, regardless of who becomes available—at least to support this team, in a year when any playoff baseball would mean they exceeded expectations.

    OF Walker Jenkins: The Future Cornerstone
    2026 Stats (43 G): .304/.401/.509, .407 wOBA, 134 wRC+

    Jenkins remains the organization's premier prospect and arguably the future face of the franchise. The former fifth overall pick has done nothing to diminish expectations, despite dealing with injuries early in his professional career. When healthy, Jenkins has shown the combination of advanced plate discipline, plus bat speed, and all-around offensive ability that made him one of the most coveted prep hitters in recent draft history.

    The Twins have spent years searching for a homegrown superstar capable of anchoring their lineup for the next decade. Jenkins has that ceiling. There’s also a strong chance that he makes his debut in 2026 and can help the club with their playoff push. 

    Why He’s Untouchable: Trading him for a veteran, even an established All-Star, would create a massive hole in the organization's long-term outlook. Players with legitimate franchise-player potential simply aren't moved unless the return is a young superstar with years of control, and those opportunities almost never materialize.

    SS Kaelen Culpepper: An Answer for the Infield
    2026 Stats (63 G): .272/.376/.492, .385 wOBA, 122 wRC+

    Few prospects have strengthened their long-term outlook as much as Culpepper since the team drafted him. His offensive development has continued, while he's also proved he can remain at shortstop, giving the Twins a potential impact player at one of baseball's premium positions.

    Why He’s Untouchable: Minnesota has used Brooks Lee, Ryan Kreidler, and Tristan Gray as stop-gap options, but Culpepper gives Minnesota a legitimate long-term shortstop plan. Even if he can’t stick at short, Culpepper's athleticism gives him the flexibility to contribute elsewhere in the infield. Premium middle infielders are difficult to acquire. The Twins already have one developing internally.

    SS Marek Houston: Elite Defensive Value Matters
    2026 Stats (74 G): .316/.396/.455, .390 wOBA, 121 wRC+

    Houston may not receive the same national attention as some of Minnesota's other top prospects, but his value inside the organization continues to grow. His elite defensive abilities at shortstop provide an incredibly high floor, while continued offensive improvements have increased confidence that he can become an everyday major-league player.

    Why He’s Untouchable: Organizations that consistently contend build around premium defenders up the middle. Houston fits that mold perfectly. Moving him for short-term help could leave the Twins searching for exactly this type of player a few years from now.

    RHP Riley Quick: The Rotation Needs More Arms
    2026 Stats (14 G): 49 1/3 IP, 3.47 ERA, 3.45 xFIP, 36.1 K%, 12.7 BB%, .182 BA

    High-quality starting pitching remains one of baseball's most expensive commodities. That's exactly why Quick shouldn't be available. He possesses the type of power arsenal that gives him legitimate mid-rotation (or better) potential. He's moved quickly since being drafted, as he was recently promoted to Double-A. There's a legitimate chance for him to make his MLB debut in 2027. 

    Why He’s Untouchable: With Joe Ryan approaching free agency in the coming years and starting pitching always carrying injury risk, the Twins need to continue developing internal rotation options. Pitching depth disappears quickly. Keeping Quick ensures Minnesota continues building one of the organization's greatest strengths.

    Other Twins Top-10 Prospects Could Be Available

    Being available doesn't mean the Twins should actively shop these prospects. It simply means the right opportunity could justify moving them. Here are some of the other Twins Daily Top-10 prospects who could be part of a trade deadline package. 

    OF Emmanuel Rodriguez: Rodriguez still possesses some of the highest offensive upside in the organization, but injuries have repeatedly interrupted his development. His talent could headline a significant trade package, particularly for a club willing to bet on his long-term health. The Twins have enough outfield depth that they could survive moving him if it meant acquiring an impactful major-league player.

    C Eduardo Tait: Catching prospects with offensive upside carry tremendous value throughout baseball. Tait's emergence has elevated his trade stock considerably, making him one of Minnesota's most attractive trade chips. At the same time, catching prospects also carry volatility because of the lengthy developmental timeline. The Twins also used their first two picks in last week's MLB Draft on college catchers Vahn Lackey and Carson Tinney. If another club values Tait as a future star, the Twins could capitalize, while addressing an immediate need.

    LHP Kendry Rojas: Left-handed starting pitching is always desirable, and Rojas has continued to improve since joining the organization. He's bounced between Triple-A and the majors, so rebuilding clubs could view him as an appealing centerpiece in negotiations. Minnesota also has increasing pitching depth throughout the system. That combination makes him valuable enough to acquire significant talent while not being completely irreplaceable.

    OF Gabriel Gonzalez: Gonzalez has consistently shown impressive bat-to-ball skills and offensive production throughout the minors. However, the Twins now possess considerable outfield depth throughout the organization, making Gonzalez one of the more logical prospects to include in trade discussions. His value may actually exceed his long-term fit in Minnesota.

    LHP Dasan Hill: Hill arguably owns one of the highest ceilings among Minnesota's pitching prospects, but he also remains further away from the major leagues than several others on this list. That distance creates opportunity. Contending teams often prefer keeping prospects who can contribute sooner while using younger, high-upside players to complete blockbuster deals. Hill fits that description perfectly. His inclusion would undoubtedly be difficult, but not impossible, if the return significantly improved Minnesota's chances over the next several seasons.

    The Twins have reached an enviable position. A year ago, the organization replenished one of baseball's strongest farm systems through aggressive trades and another successful draft. That depth now gives the front office flexibility heading into the 2026 MLB trade deadline.

    If Minnesota decides to buy, the organization shouldn't hesitate to leverage prospects from the second tier of its system to improve the major league roster. That's exactly why farm systems exist. At the same time, every successful organization identifies the players who represent its future and refuses to compromise on them.

    For the Twins, that list starts with Jenkins, Culpepper, Houston, and Quick. They aren't just highly ranked prospects. They're the foundation of what Minnesota hopes will become its next championship-caliber core.


    Who would you consider untouchable in the Twins organization? Leave a comment and start the discussion.


    Interested in learning more about the Minnesota Twins' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Twins Top Prospects

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I agree on the top 4. As for the others... I'm far less certain I'd be will to move any of the others for anyone without years of control. I get it, it's been a much more enjoyable season than I expected.

    If you're going to keep most or all the band together and take a shot at it. I'm trading from the lower 1/3 of the prospect list. 1-2 rental BP arms should fit in that range.

    Now if you're looking for another starter and a nonrental. OK there's a name or two I'd consider. Because the name is popular on the site. Let's say Reid Detmers. I'd be willing to move Tait or E rod, due to redundancy, plus lack of options for E Rod, I'd guess it'll take Matthews and at least one more from the 15-30 range as well. That's a pretty high price for a 25% chance to make it into the playoffs this season and a 10% chance to get through the WC round.

    Honestly, I'd rather reinforce the DP with rentals, take a shot at it with the current crew and save my bullets for next season. but that's just me.

    I don't think that those 4 prospects (or any prospects) are ever really untouchable, but at the same time, I don't believe they should be touched right now.

    If, for the sake of argument, we were 57-43 right now and felt like we were one SP and one big bat away from being the AL favorite, then anyone is on the table in the right deal.

    But we're not 57-43. We're 49-51 and clinging to playoff relevance, so yes, there are some guys that are "2026 untouchable"

    But at the same time, I'm going to disagree with some people in this thread that don't want to see ANY assets moved away at the deadline for marginal 2026 improvement and are still interested in the idea of selling assets. I understand your points. I just don't agree with that philosophy under the current circumstances. I believe that:

    1. There are difficult to quantify benefits to having your franchise play meaningful baseball in September and October, and
    2. Generally speaking, odd stuff can happen over small samples (the playoffs). 

    If the threshold for pushing our chips in the middle is "I think we're as good as the Dodgers," then we're never pushing. 

    1 hour ago, MMBoys93 said:

    Very fair point out of CES and Steer.

    I had not remembered immediately how far up the prospect boards Steer had jumped.

    My overall point here, though is for small market teams, the top-tier organizations are Cleveland, Tampa Bay, Milwaukee

    Tampa Bay is great at development, but they don’t shy away from trading away major league, talent and adding major league talent in the off-season or at the deadline. They don’t heavily guard their prospects as much as the twins do.

    Cleveland does not trade their players very often, but their development is the best amongst all three of these teams, and they have shown that they can win without needing to do this. What Cleveland has done is trading from a surplus to add prospect Or major league talent in areas where they feel they need it.

    And then there’s Milwaukee who does a lot of everything. They acquire good major league talent when they need it, they trade their talent away when they know they won’t resign them.

    All 3 teams maximize the value of their players.

    The twins haven’t delevoped MLB talent near the rate of the 3 orgs. They’ve  extended one homegrown player in the last 7 years. Every year their team is filled with one year deal FAs, and prospects from their organization since the beginning or from years they sell at the deadline. They’ve had a surplus of corner outfield prospects for years now, but they’ve been terrified to trade from a position of strength to strengthen an area that’s weaker. 
     

    Now they’re on the verge of losing Jeffers to FA without ever attempting to extend or move him. That’s exactly the type of player that Cle,TB,Mil would have maximized value out of. 

     

    The best small market orgs maximize the value at every stage of a players lifecycle. The Twins don’t extend players early, don’t trade them at peak value, and don’t aggressively convert prospect capital or positional strengths into major league talent.

    100 percent Tampa trades Jeffers if he's on their team. I'd say it's about fifty fifty for the other two, but maybe 60 prevent they do. 

    We have no idea if the Twins tried to extend him or not. 

    Generally, however, I agree. The twins lag those three by a lot in development, but then nearly every team does. That's not going to cut it.... They need to get better. 

    1 hour ago, amjgt said:

    I don't think that those 4 prospects (or any prospects) are ever really untouchable, but at the same time, I don't believe they should be touched right now.

    If, for the sake of argument, we were 57-43 right now and felt like we were one SP and one big bat away from being the AL favorite, then anyone is on the table in the right deal.

    But we're not 57-43. We're 49-51 and clinging to playoff relevance, so yes, there are some guys that are "2026 untouchable"

    But at the same time, I'm going to disagree with some people in this thread that don't want to see ANY assets moved away at the deadline for marginal 2026 improvement and are still interested in the idea of selling assets. I understand your points. I just don't agree with that philosophy under the current circumstances. I believe that:

    1. There are difficult to quantify benefits to having your franchise play meaningful baseball in September and October, and
    2. Generally speaking, odd stuff can happen over small samples (the playoffs). 

    If the threshold for pushing our chips in the middle is "I think we're as good as the Dodgers," then we're never pushing. 

    Nice straw man. Zero people are saying the twins have to be the best team in baseball to add. Was a good post until then. 

    Tagging on to the other article, I wonder what it would take to get Detmers and Peralta or Gausman and move Zebby and Prielipp to the bullpen this year.

    Detmers would be a big cost.  Could Emmanuel Rodriguez and Charlee Soto be the start to get it done?  If it was those 2 and another piece or two.  Soto, Rodriguez and Bohorquez for Detmers?

    Peralta or Gausman should be cheaper.  Mets traded 2 prospects for Peralta (and a reliever).  Jett Williams (was top 50 before), Brandon Sproat (in the majors).  How about Ryan Gallagher, Henry Mendez and Khadim Diaw?

    3 hours ago, amjgt said:

    The AL is the worst it's ever been. 

     

    I picked just a small sentence here to questions a common thread that has run across seemingly every media platform - mediocrity in baseball and especially in the American League with the AL Central sticking out for many people.

    Can I push back a little on this? Is is possible that the widespread/standard usage of analytics and video across baseball have pinched together most clubs? There has been a loud call for parity across MLB by many fans. I think they mean every team has relatively the same financial wherewithal as it concerns spending on players. Perhaps parity as far as competitiveness has already arrived.

    Like many of those who come to Twins Daily I follow MLB pretty closely and it seems like there are so many games decided by 3 runs or less every day. The talent level seems pretty close, closer than it has seemed in the past. However, I admit I have not done any research to determine if this is true. I'm merely forwarding the notion that one league is not well below the other and that MLB teams all have good talent. There were a pile of comments that suggested the AL All Star team would be shut out and struggle mightily versus the NL hurlers. This verbage was led by Cory Provus but was also mentioned by many others. The end result - the AL junk ball artists, including Joe Ryan, baffled the NL and against all odds (Fan Duel/Bally, Etc.) the weaker AL won.

    10 hours ago, um_stevenel said:

    I’m not sure what the restrictions are on recent draftees; but I assume the reason Lackey isn’t listed is that he will not yet be eligible to be traded. Is that correct?

    Drafted players cannot be traded until the conclusion of the World Series.

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Nice straw man. Zero people are saying the twins have to be the best team in baseball to add. Was a good post until then. 

    You’re right. Last part wasn’t necessary.

    I was trying to make a point about competitiveness vs contention but it didn’t work. 

    5 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Sure, but that's not really the way the world works, right? No one is dealing the best pitcher in baseball with years of control left for any of these guys......you know what this post is about. 

    Impossible to know since the Twins hoard their prospects like gold

    14 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    I picked just a small sentence here to questions a common thread that has run across seemingly every media platform - mediocrity in baseball and especially in the American League with the AL Central sticking out for many people.

     

    “Worst” can mean a few different things. I believe if we look at purely mathematically (win/loss percentage), my statement is true. But the meaningful sample there is quite small, because up until interleague play started, it was always 50%. Then as interleague play trickled in, it could only barely deviate from 50%. Now with roughly 30% of everyone’s schedule being against the other league, those percentages can start to get a little whackier. And this year they have. The NL is destroying the AL in interleague. 

    So mathematically, it’s true. The AL has never been worse. And that matters for the wild card. 

    But what I’ve typed above can be true and there could still be a couple really good teams. A team or two that feel inevitable to reach the ALCS. This year I just don’t see that. Of the (subjectively) 10 best teams in the league, probably 3 of them are in the AL. And are any of those 3 in the top 5? Maybe. But barely. 

    That’s more what I meant when I said it’s the worst it’s ever been. 
     

    I don't mind moving a handful of these prospects whose value that I have many questions about - more specifically in my opinion Rodriguez and Tait. Just depends what the return is, this team should not be buying any rentals but if they can find the next Pablo Lopez / Sonny Gray / Kenta Maeda trade, then pull the trigger with one of these prospects. Flip a couple major league assets for something, whether that be a AAA failed starter and try to turn into a reliever or a lottery ticket.

    Moving Rojas doesn't make sense to me. The farm system has had a lot of pitching talent graduate and there are going to be fewer arms coming up for 2027-28, they need him whether it be as a starter or reliever.

    It would seem that lots of players are untouchable up until a great offer comes along. The current team development would suggest they are building to be competitive long term starting in 27/28. We need to load up on pitching and be prudent in trading off assets when the best return is available.  
    The current squad is a little exciting but underwhelming for the most part. Its time to build for the future!

    One reason I’m reluctant to “go for it” is I don’t deem the Twins farm system to be as strong as some people. They have depth in the form of a bunch of FV 40-45 prospects which don’t usually translate into difference makers in the bigs. They have one elite prospect in Jenkins (I’m leaving Lackey out of this discussion because he can’t be traded).  I consider Culpepper and Houston to be good prospects and EmRod a total wild card. After that it gets iffy and highly volatile. Is Kyle DeBarge or Winokur going to be highly valued in a trade scenario?  I doubt it, maybe Tait moves the needle for some team but adding a really good pitcher to this team is going to cost one of their top four which is why I think it’s folly. They need to be adding prospects with a ceiling not trading them away. 

    12 hours ago, MMBoys93 said:

    I will never disagree with having a list of untouchable prospects. Every major league team has some variation of that list.
     

    Unfortunately, where the twins have really come up short the last decade is a complete unwillingness to trade decent prospects for major league talent. Outside of Petty for Gray they have tightly held onto any legitimately ranked prospect. 
     

    Unwilling to spend money-  

    Poor talent development -

    Won’t trade for major league talent-

    1 playoff series win in 20 years-

    Not entirely true. They went for it in 2022, trading 4 prospects for Jorge Lopez, 3 for Tyler Mahle, and 1 for Michael Fulmer. The results were underwhelming, but with the exception of an ok MLBer in Steer, none of the other prospects has become an MLB regular.

    12 hours ago, amjgt said:

    If we assume Jeffers is gone in 2027, which is likely but not 100%...

    2027 - Caratini (7M) + Jackson (Arb2)
    2028 - Lackey (Rookie) + Jackson (Arb3)
    2029 - Lackey (Rookie) + Tinney/Tait (Rookie)

    That assumes things go pretty well on the prospect side, but none of that feels too crazy. 

    How about Tait/Diaw!

    4 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    I picked just a small sentence here to questions a common thread that has run across seemingly every media platform - mediocrity in baseball and especially in the American League with the AL Central sticking out for many people.

    Can I push back a little on this? Is is possible that the widespread/standard usage of analytics and video across baseball have pinched together most clubs? There has been a loud call for parity across MLB by many fans. I think they mean every team has relatively the same financial wherewithal as it concerns spending on players. Perhaps parity as far as competitiveness has already arrived.

    Like many of those who come to Twins Daily I follow MLB pretty closely and it seems like there are so many games decided by 3 runs or less every day. The talent level seems pretty close, closer than it has seemed in the past. However, I admit I have not done any research to determine if this is true. I'm merely forwarding the notion that one league is not well below the other and that MLB teams all have good talent. There were a pile of comments that suggested the AL All Star team would be shut out and struggle mightily versus the NL hurlers. This verbage was led by Cory Provus but was also mentioned by many others. The end result - the AL junk ball artists, including Joe Ryan, baffled the NL and against all odds (Fan Duel/Bally, Etc.) the weaker AL won.

    Pushing back in kind: the worst division is the AL West, which is -42 games. The AL Central is just -18.

    15 hours ago, um_stevenel said:

    I’m not sure what the restrictions are on recent draftees; but I assume the reason Lackey isn’t listed is that he will not yet be eligible to be traded. Is that correct?

    drafted players can't be traded until after the World Series.  Chase Petty was one of the quickest traded draft picks going to Cincy for Sonny Gray eight months after being drafted

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...