Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Who Will Be the Highest Ranked Free Agent Signed By the Twins?

    Minnesota has plenty of roster holes to address this offseason, but its payroll limitations could steer the front office toward reunion candidates and affordable veterans, instead of the biggest names on the market.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins have several needs to address as they prepare for the 2027 season. They need more production from their infield, additional power in the middle of the lineup, and significant improvements to a bullpen that has struggled to hold leads over the last three seasons.

    It would be exciting to see Minnesota make a serious run at Tarik Skubal to anchor the rotation or sign Randy Arozarena to provide another dynamic presence in the outfield. Skubal posted a 2.72 ERA with 186 strikeouts in 158 2/3 innings in 2026, while Arozarena hit .281/.381/.484 with 26 home runs and 26 stolen bases. Both would represent significant investments for a team coming off several seasons of payroll reductions. Even with owner Tom Pohlad pledging to invest meaningfully in the roster, though, it remains difficult to envision the Twins winning a bidding war for the most expensive free agents. Minnesota needs to improve several areas, rather than spend most of its available resources on one player.

    Diamond Centric's 2026-27 free agent rankings provide a useful starting point for identifying potential targets. Several players further down the list could make sense for Minnesota, especially if the club prioritizes shorter contracts and familiar faces. Here are some of the most intriguing possibilities.

    Infield Bats

    Brandon Lowe and Bo Bichette, Nos. 2 and 3 Ranked Free Agents

    Lowe and Bichette could both fill Minnesota’s need for an infield bat, but their expected contracts likely put them out of the Twins’ price range. Lowe hit 35 home runs in 2026, while Bichette brings a strong track record as a hitter and the potential to play multiple infield positions. Both are among the top three free agents in DiamondCentric’s rankings and should attract interest from teams willing to offer significant multiyear deals. Minnesota has too many roster holes to address to commit a substantial portion of its budget to either player, making more affordable alternatives a likelier path.

    2B Luis Arraez, No. 9 Ranked Free Agent

    Arraez is a fascinating reunion candidate. The former Twin remains one of baseball's premier contact hitters, collecting 185 hits and batting .310 in 2026. He finished the season with a .765 OPS, demonstrating both his ability to reach base through contact and the limitations of a profile that relies less on power.

    His familiarity with Minnesota makes the connection easy to understand. Arraez could help the Twins improve their ability to put the ball in play and keep innings alive. He has also won three batting titles, giving him a résumé that few available hitters can match.

    The question is whether his overall offensive profile fits the team's biggest needs. Minnesota could use more home run power, and Arraez is a virtual zero in that department. His defensive limitations also require careful consideration when determining where he fits. Still, he could be a more attainable alternative to Lowe or Bichette if the Twins want to improve their lineup without chasing the most expensive hitter available.

    2B Jazz Chisholm Jr., No. 17 Ranked Free Agent

    Chisholm offers something the Twins have often lacked: a combination of power, speed and athleticism. After recording a 30-home run, 30-stolen base season in 2025, he stole 41 bases in 2026 while hitting 19 homers. His .711 OPS was less impressive, but his speed and defensive range remain attractive. He also recorded 15 Outs Above Average, placing him among the game's stronger defenders at the keystone.

    Chisholm could give Minnesota a different kind of offensive weapon. He's also young enough to fit into the club's longer-term plans. His inconsistency at the plate and potential contract demands are concerns. The Twins would need to decide whether they're buying a player coming off a down year and ready to rebound, or one already heading into early decline.

    1B Ty France, No. 23 Ranked Free Agent

    France might be a more realistic reunion candidate. He produced a strong 2026 season, hitting .295/.363/.502 with 21 home runs, 72 RBIs and an .865 OPS. Those numbers made it his most productive offensive season by OPS, giving him an appealing case for another opportunity in Minnesota.

    France does not fill the same positional need as Lowe, Bichette or Chisholm, but he could stabilize the corner infield and add another dependable hitter to the lineup. A return would depend on the cost and how the Twins envision using their other corner infielders. With several young players needing opportunities, Minnesota should be careful about paying for a veteran who does not represent a substantial upgrade over its internal options.

    Relievers

    Adrián Morejón and David Bednar, Nos. 8 and 15 Ranked Free Agents

    Morejón and Bednar could both stabilize Minnesota’s bullpen, but their expected contracts could put them out of the Twins’ price range. Morejón struck out 107 batters in 86 innings with a 2.83 ERA in 2026, making him an appealing left-handed option who could handle high-leverage situations. Bednar recorded 35 saves with a 2.47 ERA, giving him an established track record as a closer. Both ranked among the top 15 free agents, and their recent success could lead to significant offers. The Twins have been reluctant to commit multiple years to relievers, making it difficult to envision them winning a bidding war for either pitcher.

    RHP Raisel Iglesias, No. 24 Ranked Free Agent

    Iglesias could be a compelling alternative if the Twins decide they need a veteran capable of closing games. He recorded 34 saves with a 2.55 ERA in 2026, adding 64 strikeouts across 60 innings. The veteran will turn 37 during the 2027 season, which could make a shorter contract more appealing than the type of multiyear agreement a younger reliever might command. His experience and track record in high leverage situations would be valuable for a bullpen that needs more reliability.

    There would still be age-related risk, but Iglesias could offer a reasonable balance of established performance and contract flexibility. If the Twins want an experienced closer without making a long term investment, he deserves consideration.

    RHP Bryan Abreu, No. 32 Ranked Free Agent

    Abreu is another name worth monitoring because Minnesota already pursued him before the 2026 trade deadline. The Houston Astros reliever recorded a 3.73 ERA with 80 strikeouts in 62 2/3 innings during the 2026 regular season. He also collected nine saves. His strikeout ability gives him a chance to be a valuable high-leverage option, even if his 2026 ERA was not as impressive as those of some of the other pitchers on this list.

    Abreu would not necessarily be an inexpensive addition, but his lower ranking makes him a name to watch if Minnesota looks beyond the top tier of the relief market. The Twins could decide that adding one established reliever is preferable to signing several lower cost arms and hoping one emerges as a dependable late-inning option.

    Catchers

    C Ryan Jeffers, No. 11 Ranked Free Agent

    Jeffers might be the most complicated free agent on Minnesota's list because the team already knows what he can provide. He hit .270 with 14 home runs, 54 RBIs and an .872 OPS in 92 games during 2026. A fractured hamate bone limited his availability, but he was producing at a high level before the injury.

    Jeffers is the highest ranked catcher in DiamondCentric's rankings, and his offensive production should give him a strong case for a multiyear contract. The Twins must decide whether to make a qualifying offer, explore a longer agreement or prepare for life without him.

    Accepting a qualifying offer would give Jeffers another season in Minnesota, but it would come with a substantial one year salary. Declining it and pursuing a multiyear contract elsewhere could be the more attractive route for a catcher entering his prime.

    The Twins also have Victor Caratini under contract for 2027, with approximately $10 million remaining on his deal. That financial commitment complicates the decision, although it should not prevent the front office from retaining a player who has become one of its more productive hitters.

    If Jeffers accepts the qualifying offer, he would be the highest ranked free agent the Twins retain from this group. The more difficult scenario would be convincing him to sign a multiyear deal while managing the rest of the roster's needs.

    C Carson Kelly, No. 26 Ranked Free Agent

    Kelly could be an alternative if Jeffers departs. The veteran has experience as a starting catcher and offers a more established major league résumé than many of the younger options Minnesota could consider. Kelly provides a combination of defensive experience and offensive potential, although his production has fluctuated throughout his career. His 2026 season was worth 1.9 WAR, suggesting he can still provide value beyond simply filling a roster spot.

    Minnesota would have to weigh the cost of another veteran catcher against the money already committed to Caratini. A Kelly signing would make more sense if the Twins decide they need a clear replacement for Jeffers rather than a lower cost backup.

    C Tyler Stephenson, No. 35 Ranked Free Agent

    Stephenson is another potential option who could provide more offensive upside than a traditional defensive backup. He hit .241 with 15 home runs, 54 RBIs and a .727 OPS in 2026. Those numbers were not exceptional, but his history of contributing offensively makes him an interesting candidate.

    At 30 years old entering the 2027 season, Stephenson could still have several productive seasons ahead of him. However, his 2026 production would make it difficult to justify a major investment without confidence that he can return to a higher level. Minnesota could look at Stephenson if it decides to make a substantial change behind the plate. Otherwise, Caratini and Alex Jackson could enter the season sharing the catching duties while the organization evaluates its younger options.

    Who Is the Most Realistic Target?

    The Twins have several interesting choices, but their spending decisions will determine which players are realistic. Morejón and Jeffers are among the highest ranked names who directly address Minnesota's needs. Both could require commitments that the club has historically been reluctant to make.

    Arraez is an intriguing option because of his connection to Minnesota and his ability to produce hits, although the team needs more power. Iglesias and Abreu could help the bullpen, while France offers a familiar bat who could be less expensive than the top infield targets.

    My prediction is that Ty France, ranked No. 23, is the most realistic candidate to become Minnesota's highest-ranked new free agent signing. He provides a potential offensive upgrade without requiring the type of investment likely needed for Lowe or Bichette, and his familiarity with the organization makes a reunion easy to envision.

    If the Twins decide to spend more aggressively, Arraez at No. 9 becomes an intriguing alternative. And if Jeffers accepts a qualifying offer, he would immediately become the highest ranked player on this list to return to Minnesota. The key question is how much flexibility the front office actually has. The Twins need to add more than one player this winter, and the best signing might not be the biggest name available.


    Who will be the highest-ranked free agent signed by the Twins? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Well they did start doing things differently in 2026. 

     - Guys changed to new positions.  They didn't add a new position, they left the old one and stayed at the new one. Revolutionary.  EDIT: And this was mostly due to a material dissatisfaction with the defense on the field. That's also new. 

     - Guys got a look and were gone if they didn't make the grade.  Wallner was a favorite with a multi-year track record and was essentially cut in May. SWR is gone, Martin was set aside for the kids, Fedko is gone, along with Outman, Arcia, Topa, Orze and a host of other anonymous pitchers. 

     - Pitchers got to stay in longer. Far fewer bullpen/opener games. Everyone got to close if their mom brought treats. 

     - Far fewer IL trips, which sounds good until you realize I'm not pleased with this.  Several guys were allowed to hang around and chew up innings and ABs when they should have been sat down or sent down to figure stuff out or get well. Buxton and Lewis were the worst, but there were many others.  Morris was sucking the chrome off trailer hitches for a month in there, mid-Aug to mid-Sept.

    So things are different.  It's not shown up in team building much yet, but let's see how things go. If Tom P is still on his hot yoga high when the free agent season opens we might see some stuff. 

    24 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

    Since 2006, the top four Twins relievers by saves were converted starters - Nathan, Perkins, Duran, Rogers.

    Those four, plus Jax, also a converted starter, have the most fWAR. Many other top relievers had been starters, from Duensing to May to Pressly to Duffey to Varland.

    So converting a starter has been a good path.

    However, all paths should be considered. Note that Nathan had already been a reliever for a couple of when acquired by the Twins, and that Duran and Rogers were relievers for the entirety of their Twins careers. 

    And none of it matters if the team can't help the former starter figure out to succeed as a reliever.

    But Duran and Rogers were starters until immediately before their promotion. 

    Converting them has been one of the good things the front office has done. It just takes time as they almost all struggle initially. The only guys who hit the ground running were Duran and Rogers. And I don't think that's a coincidence; they got the good news/bad news routine. You're no longer a starter, BUT, congratulations, you're getting called up!

    Meanwhile the other guys were all converted mid-season or in the spring when they not only had to transition physically, but deal with the negative feelings about no longer being a starter. We know Perkins, May and Jax held resentment initially. Surely others did too. Kevin Slowey basically quit when he was told. 

    24 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    But Duran and Rogers were starters until immediately before their promotion. 

    Converting them has been one of the good things the front office has done. It just takes time as they almost all struggle initially. The only guys who hit the ground running were Duran and Rogers. And I don't think that's a coincidence; they got the good news/bad news routine. You're no longer a starter, BUT, congratulations, you're getting called up!

    Meanwhile the other guys were all converted mid-season or in the spring when they not only had to transition physically, but deal with the negative feelings about no longer being a starter. We know Perkins, May and Jax held resentment initially. Surely others did too. Kevin Slowey basically quit when he was told. 

    I think we're having two different conversations. I don't disagree with anything you said in this comment or much of your past ones, but I'm not sure of the point you're making. Is it that converting starters to relievers should be what the Twins do in 2027?

    Because I'm agreeing that is a good path to look at. I'm also saying that other paths should be considered and that recent history shows that, regardless of path, confidence should be low that current Twins management will do a good job of identifying or retaining the correct relievers.

    5 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    Yup. And the thrifty Brewers and Rays are likely also going to want to spend now, and those spots look more attractive.

    So I would rather NOT spend a ton of money in free agency if the team is only going to spend it on whatever random low-level free agents are willing to come here. I'm way more interested in trades. Particularly for another top of the rotation arm.

    Have agreed for a long time on trades being the way to go.

    If there was ever a go-big or go home off-season, this is it. You’re not “close”. Either go for a top needle-mover for the middle of the lineup, or resign yourself to using the season to see what you have with all the ready/near ready prospects. If they spectacularly overachieve, you have the deadline.

    Exception…you have to have another competent catcher.

    And YES to using trades from organizational glut (high minors and MLB) of middle infielders and left-handed hitting outfielders to at least partially address current MLB holes at C, RP, SP, and/or to upgrade the infield corners, etc.

    10 hours ago, SE23 said:

    Certainly. Provided you have valuable assets to offer in trade. We might need to acquire some valuable assets first.

    I'm not sure why you got a thumps down on this post. You are right. The Twins need to create value. 

    The Brewers have an impressive list of players rostered in 2026 that came from the trees of the Burnes, Williams, Hader trades.

    Create value and trade it. The Twins struggle to create it. 

    22 hours ago, Cris E said:

    Both are OBP guys with limited power and poor defensive chops leading to a battle to find a defensive position.  Luke has been healthier and shown more power. Luis has only been defensively average once in his career, and since it didn't happen until his age 29 season I'm not confident it's a new baseline that he can be counted on to maintain.  OTOH he seems to have stayed healthy since leaving the Twins, which was a huge knock on him early in his career. But there are far better ways to spend $20m than a slower, weaker Luke Keashall (that also could end up blocking the real Luke Keaschall at 1B or DH.) 

    Arraez was one of the best 2B in baseball last year at +12 OAA. Presumably because he changed his approach to fielding in order to maximize the lousy OAA metric. Players are beginning to talk about how OAA is making negative impacts on teams. Other than the severely flawed OAA metric, Arraez has graded out as an average-ish fielder at 2B.

    Side note TwinsDaily continuing to use British English for spell check is annoying AF.

     

     

    3 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm not sure why you got a thumps down on this post. You are right. The Twins need to create value. 

    The Brewers have an impressive list of players rostered in 2026 that came from the trees of the Burnes, Williams, Hader trades.

    Create value and trade it. The Twins struggle to create it. 

    Because they have valuable players in the minors to trade if they want. The implication they have no valuable players is ludicrous. They also have valuable MLB players they can trade is they want. 

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Because they have valuable players in the minors to trade if they want. The implication they have no valuable players is ludicrous. They also have valuable MLB players they can trade is they want. 

    The players that have the most current value is our youngsters or players that we still need to develop. 

    According to BBTV. And Yes... there are some serious doubters in regards to Baseball Trade Values.

    Jenkins, Keaschall, Bradley, Lackey and Culpepper are our most valuable trade pieces. However, an organization like ours shouldn't want to trade them because if you trade prospects... you trade them for established players and that will drive payroll beyond our range. This is what the Dodgers do, The Mets do.

    To be more like Brewers... we want to develop and try to maintain their value so they become trade options that bring back players like Lackey when the they get closer to free agency. 

    Jenkins 61.3

    Keaschall 36.8

    Bradley 36.4

    Lackey 36.0 

    Culpepper 30.4

    In regards to older players that cost money and can be traded for younger prospects.

    Joe Ryan 17

    Buxton 13.1

    That's a huge drop in regards in value on tradable assets. Joe Ryan should have been dealt last off-season.

    To put this in perspective. Riley Quick has more trade value than Joe Ryan does now with just 1 year remaining before free agency.

    To put this further in perspective. Joe Ryan last off-season had a value of 55. That's how much we lost from one off-season to the next. Last off-season Joe Ryan probably brings back two Culpepper type talents or one Jenkins type prospect. Now we get a Riley Quick type talent and that's all if you want to reload like the Brewers do with their developed assets. (Again... I understand BBTV and some people's reservations with it). In my opinion... it does a pretty good job of identifying the top trade value.  

    Looking at the Brewers. 

    Chourio has a value of 162. 

    The Miz has a value of 104

    Made has a value of 76.8

    Henderson has a value of 60.1

    They have 4 players just as valuable as Jenkins. Including 2 that are excessively more valuable. Chourio is basically untradable his value is so high. They will eat some years off his years of control. Trade him at about 60 value and just keep reloading. 

    If the Brewers want to cash in develop assets like Turang... His value is currently 43.3. He is going to return some nice prospects to reload with and then they develop the return and cash out, develop the return and cash out. 

    When Burnes was traded his value was 33.3.

    The Twins are simply not very good at developing trade value. Part of the reason I'm screaming about the strip mining of players and the reduction in value it causes. It's important they stop doing this right now. 

    The Twins are even worse at cashing it in... if they happen to develop someone like Ryan that other teams would like to acquire.

    How do we all know this... beyond the mistake we made with Ryan.

    It's simple... We don't cash them in... We let them reach free agency and very few teams want our free agents. We use them up for our benefit and nobody wants them. Ask yourself this question. How many developed Twins have signed a huge deal in free agency in the past 20 years. Most organizations have produced players that get the big pay day. Our Brian Dozier and Max Kepler's did not get paid. The biggest deal in our History was Torii Hunter 20 years ago. Where is our Machado? Where is our Soto? Where is Kyle Tucker? 

    It's this today mentality they have that some other teams don't have and they are still beating us today. 

    A GM's primary job is to increase the value of their players. Yes... Win's are more important but the Wins take care of themselves if they are able to increase the value of their players.  

    Develop or Die. 

    4 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    The players that have the most current value is our youngsters or players that we still need to develop. 

    According to BBTV. And Yes... there are some serious doubters in regards to Baseball Trade Values.

    Jenkins, Keaschall, Bradley, Lackey and Culpepper are our most valuable trade pieces. However, an organization like ours shouldn't want to trade them because if you trade prospects... you trade them for established players and that will drive payroll beyond our range. This is what the Dodgers do, The Mets do.

    To be more like Brewers... we want to develop and try to maintain their value so they become trade options that bring back players like Lackey when the they get closer to free agency. 

    Jenkins 61.3

    Keaschall 36.8

    Bradley 36.4

    Lackey 36.0 

    Culpepper 30.4

    In regards to older players that cost money and can be traded for younger prospects.

    Joe Ryan 17

    Buxton 13.1

    That's a huge drop in regards in value on tradable assets. Joe Ryan should have been dealt last off-season.

    To put this in perspective. Riley Quick has more trade value than Joe Ryan does now with just 1 year remaining before free agency.

    To put this further in perspective. Joe Ryan last off-season had a value of 55. That's how much we lost from one off-season to the next. Last off-season Joe Ryan probably brings back two Culpepper type talents or one Jenkins type prospect. Now we get a Riley Quick type talent and that's all if you want to reload like the Brewers do with their developed assets. (Again... I understand BBTV and some people's reservations with it). In my opinion... it does a pretty good job of identifying the top trade value.  

    Looking at the Brewers. 

    Chourio has a value of 162. 

    The Miz has a value of 104

    Made has a value of 76.8

    Henderson has a value of 60.1

    They have 4 players just as valuable as Jenkins. Including 2 that are excessively more valuable. Chourio is basically untradable his value is so high. They will eat some years off his years of control. Trade him at about 60 value and just keep reloading. 

    If the Brewers want to cash in develop assets like Turang... His value is currently 43.3. He is going to return some nice prospects to reload with and then they develop the return and cash out, develop the return and cash out. 

    When Burnes was traded his value was 33.3.

    The Twins are simply not very good at developing trade value. Part of the reason I'm screaming about the strip mining of players and the reduction in value it causes. It's important they stop doing this right now. 

    The Twins are even worse at cashing it in... if they happen to develop someone like Ryan that other teams would like to acquire.

    How do we all know this... beyond the mistake we made with Ryan.

    It's simple... We don't cash them in... We let them reach free agency and very few teams want our free agents. We use them up for our benefit and nobody wants them. Ask yourself this question. How many developed Twins have signed a huge deal in free agency in the past 20 years. Most organizations have produced players that get the big pay day. Our Brian Dozier and Max Kepler's did not get paid. The biggest deal in our History was Torii Hunter 20 years ago. Where is our Machado? Where is our Soto? Where is Kyle Tucker? 

    It's this today mentality they have that some other teams don't have and they are still beating us today. 

    A GM's primary job is to increase the value of their players. Yes... Win's are more important but the Wins take care of themselves if they are able to increase the value of their players.  

    Develop or Die. 

    Um. I hope you didn't think you're arguing with me? I've been saying this for years. 

    2 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    I don't know if I am or ain't. 

    I'm just saying I didn't understand the thumbs down. 

    Apart from Ryan, we have no MLB-ready talent to deal -- other than the handful of young, controllable guys who we DON'T want to trade. And Ryan's value is sadly depleted in the marketplace. We are multiple seasons away from being in position to make a meaningful, winning trade.

    So let's learn to make the most of our internal solutions at almost every roster slot. Develop our young players! Maybe a solid FA signing can be part of the formula. But trades will not play a significant role on our MLB roster for the next year or two.

    21 minutes ago, SE23 said:

    Apart from Ryan, we have no MLB-ready talent to deal -- other than the handful of young, controllable guys who we DON'T want to trade. And Ryan's value is sadly depleted in the marketplace. We are multiple seasons away from being in position to make a meaningful, winning trade.

    So let's learn to make the most of our internal solutions at almost every roster slot. Develop our young players! Maybe a solid FA signing can be part of the formula. But trades will not play a significant role on our MLB roster for the next year or two.

    100%

    I read your post and that's exactly how I interpreted it and I thought your post was a spot obvious point. 

    In order for trades to work for you. You have to have value to trade to get value back.  Trading low value gets you low value. That's not going to produce talent. 

    We all know free agents are not going to work for us because we don't have the budget to make it work.

    So we got to develop players that have trade value to make trades work for you and we are not doing that. 

    You were completely correct when you said

    12 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    Certainly. Provided you have valuable assets to offer in trade. We might need to acquire some valuable assets first.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...