Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Which Twins Players Are Playing Their Last Games in Minnesota?

    With the offseason approaching, here are six veterans who could be playing their final games in a Twins uniform.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Brad Rempel-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Even with games remaining on the schedule, the Twins' offseason roster decisions are beginning to take shape. Several players are approaching free agency, creating decisions about whether Minnesota wants to bring them back or let them test the open market. Others have struggled enough this season that offering them arbitration or committing another roster spot could be difficult to justify. Then there are players who haven't necessarily done anything wrong, but are watching younger players with more upside move past them on the organizational depth chart.

    That combination could lead to significant turnover this winter. The Twins have spent much of 2026 evaluating what their next competitive roster should look like. As the season winds down, that makes the final games more than just a conclusion to a disappointing year. They are also an opportunity to look at which players might no longer have a place on the next version of this team.

    So, with the offseason approaching, which Twins players could be playing their final games in Minnesota?

    Ryan Jeffers

    Jeffers is probably the most obvious player on this list from a contractual standpoint. The 29-year-old catcher is headed to free agency, which will offer the first opportunity to secure a multi-year deal. The Twins can make him a qualifying offer, but that's unlikely—and even if they did, Jeffers would probably turn it down, as he continues looking for guaranteed money and a longer commitment. Minnesota has a decision to make behind the plate, and Jeffers will have plenty of suitors when he reaches the open market.

    Josh Bell

    The Twins signed Bell hoping he could build on the improvements he showed during the second half of last season. That hasn't really happened. Bell has posted a 105 OPS+ this season, which sits 10 points below his career average. He doesn't provide defensive value, putting additional pressure on his bat to carry his roster spot. At this stage of his career, Father Time may be starting to catch up with Bell. The Twins could look for a younger option at first base and designated hitter this winter.

    Taylor Rogers

    Rogers wanted to finish his career where it started. He has accomplished another major milestone by reaching 10 years of MLB service time, which gives him the pension benefits associated with a decade in the majors. Now, retirement could be the next step. Rogers has had a remarkable career, including an All-Star appearance and years of being one of the game's more reliable left-handed relievers. This season, however, has been forgettable.

    Bailey Ober

    Ober's situation is more complicated, but there are legitimate questions about his future with the Twins. His fastball velocity hasn't returned to where it was earlier in his career, and the Twins have pushed his recent starts back multiple times. There have still been successful stretches, but starting pitching becomes much more difficult when a fastball consistently tops out in the high-80s. Ober has shown that he can pitch without overpowering stuff. It's less clear whether he can do it consistently enough to remain a rotation piece for a team trying to build its next contender.

    Matt Wallner

    Wallner has already played his final game for the Twins this season. He has been at Triple-A since May and has continued to produce at a high level, but the organizational depth chart has changed around him. Younger outfielders have moved ahead of him, and Wallner has publicly suggested that he doesn't expect to return. That makes him one of the more obvious offseason storylines. A player with his power could still attract interest elsewhere, especially after another productive season in St. Paul.

    Dark Horse: Royce Lewis

    This is where the exercise gets really interesting. Lewis has not produced at a high enough level (91 OPS+) to make his return to first base an automatic decision for 2027. The Twins have invested heavily in him over the years, but roster construction eventually has to be based on what a player is producing now rather than what everyone believes he can become. One possibility would be moving Lewis back to a platoon role at second base, pairing him with a left-handed hitter. But that creates another question: Is that actually a role in which Lewis can succeed?

    That makes him the dark horse on this list. It would be surprising to see the Twins move on, but the organization has plenty of decisions to make before next season. The final games of the 2026 season won't mean much in the standings for Minnesota, but they could provide important clues about the organization's plans.

    Free agents will make their own decisions. Veterans could retire. Younger players could force their way onto the roster. And the front office will have to determine which pieces still fit with the direction of the organization. 


    Will any of these players be back next season? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I have a hard time dumping Ober when we have so many question marks on the pitching staff.  Even with all of his question marks.

    They need to decide that 2027 is being used to chart the path forward for the team.  If they do - and they deal Lopez, Ryan, Larnach, etc. - then I think you bring Ober back just as insurance.

    I think they can retain Kremer OR Ober, not Kremer AND Ober

    You can't have a competitive plan based around the ascendence of young, minimum-salaried starting pitching, and then have two guys being paid arb-3 prices (let's say $7-$8MM each) that must be kept in the back of your rotation.   And it's easy to see a world where they become the 2027 version of Archer and Bundy weighing down 40% of the rotation

    Either open the slot up for competition among the young guys (who also retain the flexibility to be shuttled between Mpls and St Paul based on performance and health as needed), or use the savings toward a true difference-maker that actually raises the ceiling of the rotation, whether acquired via trade or free agency.  Kremer and Ober are redundant since they give you the same thing: reliable innings volume that you wouldn't want to trust starting a playoff game

    I'm starting to think that Kremer was targeted to be Ober's replacement for next year.  Given Kremer's recovery from injury and Ober's increasing reliance on smoke and mirrors to get by, I know who I would be betting on to be more reliable next year

    But I wouldn't jettison both of them.  We saw just this year how quickly starting pitching depth can evaporate.

     

    1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

    "In the top three of almost every hitting category for the Twins" is not a high bar to clear. It's why this team has been bad more than good for a while. He's not a good enough hitter to be a DH.

    Fangraphs has 17 qualified hitters who were primarily DHs. Josh Bell is number 15 in wRC+ at 106. He's barely an above average hitter for any position. Having him as a DH is not how you build a successful team. Having him as one of your top 3 hitters is not how you build a successful team. It's why this team is never good.

    If you were GM, what are your solutions.

    1 hour ago, The Great Hambino said:

    I think they can retain Kremer OR Ober, not Kremer AND Ober

    You can't have a competitive plan based around the ascendence of young, minimum-salaried starting pitching, and then have two guys being paid arb-3 prices (let's say $7-$8MM each) that must be kept in the back of your rotation.   And it's easy to see a world where they become the 2027 version of Archer and Bundy weighing down 40% of the rotation

    Either open the slot up for competition among the young guys (who also retain the flexibility to be shuttled between Mpls and St Paul based on performance and health as needed), or use the savings toward a true difference-maker that actually raises the ceiling of the rotation, whether acquired via trade or free agency.  Kremer and Ober are redundant since they give you the same thing: reliable innings volume that you wouldn't want to trust starting a playoff game

    I'm starting to think that Kremer was targeted to be Ober's replacement for next year.  Given Kremer's recovery from injury and Ober's increasing reliance on smoke and mirrors to get by, I know who I would be betting on to be more reliable next year

    But I wouldn't jettison both of them.  We saw just this year how quickly starting pitching depth can evaporate.

     

    Agreed with the logic.  In the case of if they deal Lopez and Ryan - which they should - then we have Abel, Zebby, Prielipp, Kremer, Taj, Festa, Rojas.   I think I might still bring back Ober in that scenario if no starting pitching comes back via trade, but I wouldn't die on a hill for it at that point.

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    "In the top three of almost every hitting category for the Twins" is not a high bar to clear. It's why this team has been bad more than good for a while. He's not a good enough hitter to be a DH.

    Fangraphs has 17 qualified hitters who were primarily DHs. Josh Bell is number 15 in wRC+ at 106. He's barely an above average hitter for any position. Having him as a DH is not how you build a successful team. Having him as one of your top 3 hitters is not how you build a successful team. It's why this team is never good.

    Bell typically catches on with teams that aren't considered PO contenders in the off-season. He's quite often not traded to a buyer at the deadline either. The signing of Bell by the Twins was a clear signal to me at least that this team didn't consider itself a contender when they signed him. That's my take anyway.

     

    I would like this team to move on from Lewis at this point. But I don't believe it will.

    3 hours ago, Coach said:

    Do we really want to play roulette with the DH?  What happens when of the four mentioned goes down?  Batting DH is not necessarily a "breather". but can take a fielding player out of their rhythm. Bell is the consummate DH.  Bell was also in the top three of almost every hitting category for the Twins.  For his production, he was very affordable.  Also, he is a clubhouse guy. 

    I'm not anti Bell. I just don't know that they'll spend for him. Each time we have let a role guy go (ahem Ty France) I regret it.

    6 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Agreed with the logic.  In the case of if they deal Lopez and Ryan - which they should - then we have Abel, Zebby, Prielipp, Kremer, Taj, Festa, Rojas.   I think I might still bring back Ober in that scenario if no starting pitching comes back via trade, but I wouldn't die on a hill for it at that point.

    I'm operating under the assumption that both Ryan and Lopez are coming back.  I don't think Lopez has a market this offseason given the injury (maybe at the deadline if things break a certain way, but there's a lot of ifs involved in that scenario playing out), and I think if they were gonna trade Ryan, they would've by now.  I'm more inclined to keep both Kremer and Ober if one or both of Lopez and Ryan are moved.

    But keeping and acquiring guys like Kremer and Ober is pretty in line with what I see as Falvey's overarching philosophy of raising the floor.  It was needed when he came on board for a franchise that had lost 90+ in 5 of 6 seasons from 2011-2016, but the end result has been consistent win totals in the 70s instead of in the 60s. 

    I'm tired of raising the floor.  The time has come to raise the ceiling.

    38 minutes ago, Coach said:

    If you were GM, what are your solutions.

    If I were GM, this team would look very different today than it does. Some for the good, some for the bad. But if you're saying I'm a newly hired GM taking over for this offseason, I'm doing what I would've done for this season, turning it over to as much youth as I can. 

    That's the challenge, though. If I'd been GM last offseason, I would've completed the rebuild. I would've traded Lopez, Ryan, and Jeffers. I would've had more youth to throw into the lineup and pitching staff now. But they didn't. And they've now limited their options moving forward and put themselves in a much worse spot than they needed to be.

    I wouldn't, and I hope they don't, compound the mistake of last offseason this season. I'm not running back the majority of a roster that has proven for years that it isn't good enough and pretending retaining, or adding, Bell level players is the solution. I'm going with youth everywhere I can and looking for actual difference makers to bring in from the outside, if possible. There's only a handful of hitters who could help. But I'd be swinging at Seiya Suzuki level bats on the free agent market, and Yandy Diaz level bats on the trade market, and wouldn't even be considering a Bell level bat.

    10 hours ago, TroyVang said:

    Why would they not make the QO to Jeffers? Worst case is that you get another year of a great catcher. Would you be overpaying? Maybe, but not by much. And he would likely decline it so he could the long term deal. That means that the Twins that get an extra draft pick. I feel like this is a no-brainer, but I guess it's not.

    We've been backed into a corner, that the management painted, we have no choice.

    1 hour ago, Patzky said:

    I'm not anti Bell. I just don't know that they'll spend for him. Each time we have let a role guy go (ahem Ty France) I regret it.

    Beyond France, who else? That’s about it. I don’t regret letting Sano, Santana, Solano, Margot, Gallo etc etc 

    5 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Beyond France, who else? That’s about it. I don’t regret letting Sano, Santana, Solano, Margot, Gallo etc etc 

    I think Solano would have been a solid holdover.. maybe 50 50 on Santana.  We just replaced him with France and then Bell. 

    12 hours ago, Eris said:

    Because Larnach was / is the 3rd or 4th best hitter on the Twins and is approximately in the 75th percentile as an MLB hitter.  Players who are above average hitters have value. The problem with Larnach is he should be a full time DH and the Twins also have 5 or 6 players whose best position is DH. 

    One thing to remember is that his stats benefit from the care his manager takes to shield him from lefty pitchers.  Fellow left-hander Kody Clemens has faced LHP in 28% of his plate appearances this season, which drags down his overall numbers.  Larnach has faced LHP in 13% of his PA - much less of a drag.

    This is due greatly to how unplayable Larnach is when facing a lefty - OPS this season is .572 and this is not an outlier compared to past seasons.  Shelton does it for the good of the team, not to "pad" Larnach's numbers.  (Clemens by contrast is merely mediocre at .689 against lefties.)

    Different splits of opportunity (an extreme R/L 378/55 PA for Larnach and a much more modest 396/152 for Clemens) almost gets us into one of those mathematical paradoxes where both splits favor one player while the totals favor the other.

    Do you really want a DH who has to be platooned, and even then can still be neutralized by the opposing manager at will?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...