Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Don't Need a Full Rebuild. They Need a Direction.

    Minnesota has enough young talent to build around, but the organization has to decide whether it's actually trying to win in 2027.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    After a third straight second-half collapse, there's a temptation to look at the 2026 Minnesota Twins and assume the organization needs to tear everything down. The record certainly makes that argument easier. Minnesota entered the final stretch of the season out of the playoff picture after buying at the trade deadline, and the club has spent much of the second half looking more like a team searching for answers than one preparing for October.

    But a bad season does not automatically create the need for a full rebuild. The Twins aren't starting from zero. In fact, the organization has some things that many rebuilding teams would love to have: young players already contributing at the major-league level, premium prospects moving toward the big leagues, established stars under team control, and a pitching staff that could look considerably different with better health. So, what's missing?

    There Is a Foundation

    Luke Keaschall, Taj Bradley, Brooks Lee, and Connor Prielipp have all given the Twins reasons to believe they can be meaningful pieces of the next competitive team. None of those players should be treated as a guaranteed star. That's not how young player development works, and Major League success is never guaranteed. But Minnesota has multiple young players who have already reached the big leagues and have room to develop.

    Then there is the next wave. Walker Jenkins remains one of the organization's premier prospects. Kaelen Culpepper has already seen early success in the majors. Emmanuel Rodriguez represents another high-upside player who could become an important part of the lineup.

    And the Twins still have two established players who can serve as the centerpieces of a competitive roster in Joe Ryan and Byron Buxton. Ryan's second half has complicated the picture, but his first-half performance showed why the Twins have viewed him as a potential top-of-the-rotation arm. Buxton's health is always going to be part of the conversation, but when healthy, he remains one of the most impactful players Minnesota can put on the field.

    The Twins don't need to find an entire core. They need to determine what they are doing with the core they already have.

    The Rotation Could Have Real Depth

    Pitching health has been one of the biggest variables surrounding this organization. Pablo López is expected to return from Tommy John surgery. Mick Abel should also be part of the pitching picture after recovering from arthroscopic surgery on his right elbow. Those additions could significantly change the depth chart.

    A theoretical 2027 rotation picture could include Ryan, Bradley, López, Dean Kremer, and Prielipp, with Zebby Matthews, Abel, Kendry Rojas, David Festa, Mike Paredes, Ryan Gallagher, Riley Quick, and Adrian Bohorquez providing additional options.

    That's a lot of names, but the Twins saw how quickly that depth can evaporate in one season. Obviously, not all of them will become reliable Major League starters. Some could end up in the bullpen. Others could struggle with injuries or development. A few may never establish themselves in the majors.

    But that's the point. The Twins have pitching depth to work with. They don't have to manufacture an entire rotation from scratch. They need to figure out which pitchers belong in the rotation, which belong in the bullpen, and where the organization needs to spend money to stabilize the group.

    The Bullpen Doesn't Need to Be Rebuilt Either

    The bullpen is another area where the Twins should be in better shape entering next season. Yoendrys Gómez, Jeff Hoffman, and Andrew Morris could form the foundation of the late-inning group. Kody Funderburk and Tommy Nance can fill middle-inning roles.

    That doesn't mean Minnesota should simply declare the bullpen finished. It should add a couple of veteran pieces if the opportunity presents itself. Relievers are volatile, and having too many legitimate options is rarely a problem.

    But this is a much different starting point than the beginning of 2026. The Twins entered this season with a bullpen that was one of baseball's worst and actively cost the team games. The organization eventually had to spend resources fixing a problem that should have been addressed before the season. Minnesota shouldn't repeat that mistake.

    The Real Question Is the Direction

    This is where everything gets complicated. The Twins can build a competitive roster in 2027. That doesn't mean they will. There is a massive difference between having enough talent to compete and operating like an organization that intends to compete.

    If Minnesota wants to win next season, the path is relatively straightforward. Keep the young core together. Get López and the other injured pitchers healthy. Give the young players legitimate opportunities. Add veteran pitching. Improve the bullpen. Address the holes in the lineup. Spend enough money to turn the roster's potential into actual Major League production. It won't guarantee a playoff berth. But it would represent a coherent plan. The alternative is another year of half-measures.

    If the Twins aren't going to meaningfully increase payroll, they need to acknowledge that reality. If they are going to prioritize development, they need to make difficult decisions about veterans blocking younger players. If they believe this group can compete, they need to actually invest in making that happen. What cannot happen again is building a roster that is simultaneously too expensive to be a developmental team and not good enough to be a legitimate contender. That is how organizations get stuck.

    Minnesota Doesn't Need to Start Over

    The easiest thing to do after a disappointing season is to declare everything broken. The Twins aren't there. They have young Major League players. They have premium prospects. They have established stars. They have pitching depth. They have a bullpen that should be more functional. They have players returning from significant injuries.

    There are legitimate questions throughout the roster, but every organization has those questions. The biggest question isn't whether Minnesota has enough talent to build something. It is whether the people making the decisions believe this group is worth building around. If the answer is yes, then 2027 needs to look like it.

    That means spending money, filling holes, protecting the young talent, and making decisions with the goal of winning games rather than simply maintaining flexibility. If the answer is no, then the Twins need to be honest about that, too. A rebuild is a strategy. So is contention. What Minnesota cannot afford is another season without choosing a direction.


    Do the Twins need a full rebuild? How can the Twins contend next season? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    39 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    It's always frustrating when your opponents have a better understanding of your players' potential than the people running your own organization.

    Toronto’s GM had to have been thrilled every time Derek Falvey called. Fleece job after fleece job. 

    On 9/17/2026 at 10:25 PM, ewen21 said:

    This is why Buxton wants to be a Twin for life in my mind.  He knows the expectations are almost non-existent for him.  He's who has been chosen to be "the face of the franchise" and this is largely due to a large section of the fanbase.  It almost seems as though since Target Field has opened the Twins and a great number of fans are content with Buxton even though he appears in roughly 60% of the games each season.  If this is the player you want to make for your "face of the franchise" then good luck with building a team.

     

    Rant over!

    Totally off subject, but I want to apologize for being disrespectful to you, it was one of those days.  I do agree with you on this take, Buck is way too comfortable.

    20 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    This brings up something I've been saying for awhile (and fought upstream abput with many posters here): I don't think Falvey had advanced notice on the payroll slash or the "we're going to win!" ownership changeups.  I think he added Correa under the notion he had payroll manueverability and had it abruptly changed.  This offseason he resigned rather than deal with it again.

    It was suggested on Gleeman's podcast that Falvey was led to believe that they were in year one of a five year runway of increased payroll when they decided to reverse course after 2023.  So he got his budget slashed right after locking in some immovable high-price contracts in Correa and Lopez, which handcuffed the payroll until they had to pay for Correa to go away. 

    If true, no wonder the limited partners wanted nothing to do with Joe P

    5 hours ago, LastOnePicked said:

    That's probably the real rot. We've changed GMs, managers, coaches, rosters. The one constant is the Pohlad heirs - people with no real interest in baseball, no urgency to grow the business and no understanding of how to build a winner.

    The residents of the Twin Cities better hope the next owners provide some kind of improved outcomes, or else some soul-searching will be the next step - assuming enough of them even care.  😁

    20 hours ago, jkcarew said:

    Except that the very first thing Tom did was to fire the previous GM who had just begun an obvious rebuild. Followed up by a deliberate, highly visible campaign tour promising a commitment to “winning”.

    Falvey had the business operations duties taken away from him and he didn't agree with that.  The Twins have always split the business and baseball operations duties.  Falvey was given the additional business operations duties when St. Peter because at that time the team was up for sale so it would seem that was a transitionary move.  But Falvey wanted both and felt one person could do both and Tom P. didn't agree.  Now Tom P. may have pushed him out the door with that move, but he wasn't fired.

    2 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Falvey had the business operations duties taken away from him and he didn't agree with that.  The Twins have always split the business and baseball operations duties.  Falvey was given the additional business operations duties when St. Peter because at that time the team was up for sale so it would seem that was a transitionary move.  But Falvey wanted both and felt one person could do both and Tom P. didn't agree.  Now Tom P. may have pushed him out the door with that move, but he wasn't fired.

    1000% pushed out the door and his recent moves to sell at the previous deadline was what triggered everything…perceived bad PR, Tom coming in and making promises (that he had no chance of keeping). Pushed out or fired. Same thing.

    39 minutes ago, jkcarew said:

    1000% pushed out the door and his recent moves to sell at the previous deadline was what triggered everything…perceived bad PR, Tom coming in and making promises (that he had no chance of keeping). Pushed out or fired. Same thing.

    Falvey was looking for a way out because he wanted to operate like the big boys and when he got his feelings hurt because he had duties taken away from him that anyone in his position would know were temporary.  He then had his out and grabbed it.

    2 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    It was suggested on Gleeman's podcast that Falvey was led to believe that they were in year one of a five year runway of increased payroll when they decided to reverse course after 2023.  So he got his budget slashed right after locking in some immovable high-price contracts in Correa and Lopez, which handcuffed the payroll until they had to pay for Correa to go away. 

    If true, no wonder the limited partners wanted nothing to do with Joe P

    Do you know when they had that conversation on Gleeman's pod?  I'm curious to hear his reporting on this.

    But yeah, this is exactly what I was speculating back in this thread.  It's the only reasonable explanation for how he behaved as a GM.

    1 hour ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Falvey was looking for a way out because he wanted to operate like the big boys and when he got his feelings hurt because he had duties taken away from him that anyone in his position would know were temporary.  He then had his out and grabbed it.

    You may need to accept that you've had the Pohlad/Falvey situation wrong from the get-go.

    Like I said in our conversation from a few months ago - it takes nothing away from your valid criticisms of Falvey to distinguish between things that are his fault and blame that lies at the feet of the Pohlads.

    My guess is that Falvey realized he no longer had an ownership group he could count on to be consistent in setting short and long term expectations and resigned rather than become the fall guy.  (Though he deserved to be that fall guy for moves unrelated to Pohlad behavior)

    6 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    You may need to accept that you've had the Pohlad/Falvey situation wrong from the get-go.

    Like I said in our conversation from a few months ago - it takes nothing away from your valid criticisms of Falvey to distinguish between things that are his fault and blame that lies at the feet of the Pohlads.

    My guess is that Falvey realized he no longer had an ownership group he could count on to be consistent in setting short and long term expectations and resigned rather than become the fall guy.  (Though he deserved to be that fall guy for moves unrelated to Pohlad behavior)

    “We believe that the best structure going forward is a president of business and a president of baseball,” Pohlad said.

    “I think any structure can work with the right belief in it, with the right people, with the right people underneath, and the foundation,” Falvey said. “And I want to say this: I totally respect Tom's position that he would like it to look a little different in the other way. There are few teams that have it this way, there are a lot more teams that don't that have it spread apart. I totally respect that decision. It's a really hard job for sure to do both. I think with the right environment, the right structure around it, you can do both,

    This is from the reporting at the time of his leaving.  His own words say he wanted both positions.  

    I blame the Pohlads for not addressing this at the end of the season due to not having the ownership situation worked out.  Because they just continued the same practices for another year and I hope they address it soon.

    25 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    “We believe that the best structure going forward is a president of business and a president of baseball,” Pohlad said.

    “I think any structure can work with the right belief in it, with the right people, with the right people underneath, and the foundation,” Falvey said. “And I want to say this: I totally respect Tom's position that he would like it to look a little different in the other way. There are few teams that have it this way, there are a lot more teams that don't that have it spread apart. I totally respect that decision. It's a really hard job for sure to do both. I think with the right environment, the right structure around it, you can do both,

    This is from the reporting at the time of his leaving.  His own words say he wanted both positions.  

    I blame the Pohlads for not addressing this at the end of the season due to not having the ownership situation worked out.  Because they just continued the same practices for another year and I hope they address it soon.

    I don't personally consider press conference comments to be terribly reliable about what is happening behind the scenes.

    Per our previous conversation, and the one you're having here, I don't think you're considering Falvey's behavior relative to your narrative about what occurred.  As I said before, abrupt changes from ownership are the most comprehensive explanation for the last 3-4 years.  Abrupt changes that caused Falvey to have to make decisions that were seemingly incoherent or lacked long-term thinking.  Ultimately, which caused him to peace out.

    11 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    The only significant asset the Twins moved was Duran.

    The guy that returned Taj Bradley wasn't a significant asset? That same guy that looks like he might be a playoffs starter? He's not significant? How about Varland? Is the guy that performed like a top 5 reliever in the league significant? 

    Not arguing the trades aren't defensible, but to say the players traded were insignificant seems a mighty stretch. 

     

    Quote

    Twins fans have been coddled in this market featuring the only team in the AL Central which has never walked out a sub-$100MM payroll during the Falvey era.

    These plebians have had it far too good for far too long. LEAVE THE BILLIONAIRES ALONE! 

    1 hour ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I don't personally consider press conference comments to be terribly reliable about what is happening behind the scenes.

    Per our previous conversation, and the one you're having here, I don't think you're considering Falvey's behavior relative to your narrative about what occurred.  As I said before, abrupt changes from ownership are the most comprehensive explanation for the last 3-4 years.  Abrupt changes that caused Falvey to have to make decisions that were seemingly incoherent or lacked long-term thinking.  Ultimately, which caused him to peace out.

    We view the events that have occurred differently and will have to agree to disagree.

    The top management, the owners -- it's hard to change things when there isn't real change at that level.   I  hope our most recent generation of home grown talent materializes over this year and next, but  any MLB team has to also have some financial infusion via trades and at least some self-awareness about what is keeping team from doing well if it struggles to compete year after year.    

    Also, it seems hard to ignore that Buxton and even Ryan are not reliable second half players.  You can't continue to have two of your best players disappear in final months, it's one factor in end of year collapses if rest of your roster can't make up the difference.  We've sorta moved on to rebuilding despite not moving Jeffers or Ryan or Larnach at deadline.

    Still, with all that and despite another deteriorating season, I still like some elements of this team -- not a moody group; some really dedicated players (Keaschall); and in some games players showed more grit than I've seen in recent years of Twins play (my favorite was the epic comeback in bottom of ninth and two outs with Kody's grand slam).  

    So for next year... Move on from Lewis, Larnach, Martin, Wallner, Caratini, Ober.  Time to finally pull the plug.

    For 27,  Lee, Keaschall, Clemens, and the newly arrived cohort (Jenkins, Culpepper, Rodriguez).  If Marek Houston comes up as SS, move Culpepper to second, Clemens to super utility?   Twins could make Jeffers an offer, probably won't keep him.  If not, catcher is going to be a black hole.   Finally, key with such a young roster to have a veteran presence or two if Bell isn't returning.

    I guess Taj Bradley and Lopez (IF he returns to form) are at top of pitching rotation.  Not a given with Prielep,  Zebby.   The bull pen is going to need some reinforcement, still.  Promise not to mention Varland again.  

    Funny thing -- We're already used to Twins not paying for talent, esp uninjured talent, we assume it's off the table.   If we're not going to patch holes with much in the way of trades, then imperative to finally scrutinize how this team goes about player recruitment and development and maintenance of player health; identify front office practices and ownership behaviors which keep us down year to year.   I'm not saying that will happen, but it needs to.

     

    10 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Do you know when they had that conversation on Gleeman's pod?  I'm curious to hear his reporting on this.

    But yeah, this is exactly what I was speculating back in this thread.  It's the only reasonable explanation for how he behaved as a GM.

    Nothing specific unfortunately.  He's alluded to it a couple of times but haven't been able to find it in an article.  It wasn't a real in-depth conversation, more a mention in passing.

    While it's possible I hallucinated the entire thing, it really does track with what I think is the most reasonable timeline.  There's no way Falvey hands out the Lopez extension and Correa's second contract without ownership approval, and there's no way that ownership approves those contracts if the plan was to slash payroll by $30MM at the end of that same season.  There had to have been a change in budget vs the original plan

    It also aligns with ownership decision making that would lead an outside investor to insist on a change of leadership as part of their agreement to make an investment

    On 9/19/2026 at 6:15 PM, Coach said:

    Totally off subject, but I want to apologize for being disrespectful to you, it was one of those days.  I do agree with you on this take, Buck is way too comfortable.

    Nothing here to me is personal, but I do appreciate you for saying this.  I have had some of those days over the years myself so thanks for being a real person. Let me apologize also.  I could have probably done better myself! 

     

    That being said, I think this franchise has a problem that cannot be fixed easily.  I think that when we won some divisions, had a star player in Joe Mauer and then got the new stadium things completely flipped over to something else.  Somehow, some way the franchise seems to believe marketing a star player is most appealing to the fanbase and Buxton became that guy.  He has received special treatment since he got here because everyone wanted him to be a superstud and he just isn't that.  I do not care how great he looks in streaks because he also has slumps where he looks absolutely awful and he cannot be relied upon to be "an everyday player" as it was with Torii Hunter.

     

    I think the ridiculous praise Buxton gets is a big problem for the Twins and there is a segment of the fanbase that actually gets angry when he receives criticism.  Buxton really never got any blowback for his tantrum in 2018 when he cleaned out his locker and bolted from Rochester when the Twins didn't call him up in September.  Instead of holding him accountable for this extended outburst he was defended here.  Even if we assume the Twins were wrong to not call him up September of 2018 (and to me they were not), his behavior never should have been excused (and it was here).  The same goes for when he pitched a fit over a fans breaking his chops during the new uniform reveal in November of 2022.  He went right on Twitter to confront the minor jabs thrown his way at that was straight up embarrassing.  He was actually defended here for firing back and the fans were blamed.  It wasn't just here either.  Professional athletes taking to Twitter when they are active players to get into it with fans is unprofessional.   Period.

     

    No way in the world should a player take to Twitter and address something so innocuous and minor the way he did.  It shows a lack of professionalism on his part no matter how dumb anyone thought the fan comments were.  Even if the comments were dumb, the criticism was FAIR.   Predictably (at that time) this place (the majority at least) put the blame on fans being jerks and if anyone commented that Buxton overreacted or lacked professionalism for his "wanna-be fans are clowns" comment they were blasted.  The notion being, the fans were "attacking his character" and that made them wrong.  That is just insane to me. 

     

    Finally he has gone on about wanting to be a "Twin for life" and why wouldn't he?  This a nice cushy spot for him.  No way in the world would just about any other organization tolerate the uncertainty and the puzzle he presents for the organization.  We needed to  have a "plan B" in place as long as he was our starting CF.  I do not recall that being the case for Hunter, Puckett or name any other outfielder who gets the "face of the franchise" tag.   The man has 862 hits in a dozen seasons with this organization.  Since he was called up in June of 2015 that equates to an average of 72 his per season and that simply is not good enough and we cannot expect this to improve as he comes off hip surgery going into his 33 year old season.  I think he's a problem and I do not say this to offend anyone.

     

    I would much rather move toward the kind of team that doesn't need to have a someone they put up on a pedestal, but rather a TEAM of players like we had in the early 2000s.   I would much rather see a team like the 2001 team (that didn't make the playoffs) than see a team like this one back in like the front office believed they might.

     

    That is a long one.  If you got this far than thanks for reading




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...