Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Falvey And Levine Machine


    Nick Nelson

    In some corners, Minnesota's new front office leaders will probably be handed too much credit for their roles in one of the most remarkable turnarounds ever by a major-league team. In Year 1 under Derek Falvey and Thad Levine, the Twins will improve by at least 24 wins, going from 100 losses to a probable playoff berth. The narrative is obvious.

    Twins Video

    But the more striking narrative here pertains to the duo's good fortune, rather than their miraculous intervention.

    Most often, baseball executives getting their first chances to lead a major-league front office are tasked with overhauling a complete mess. From the outside, that's what this looked like: Falvey and Levine inherited the reigning worst team in baseball, one that had lost 90-plus games in five of the last six seasons.

    They spoke frequently about their big-picture mindset, expressing an intent to eschew shortcuts and quick fixes.

    But the staggering improvement we've seen this year owes to something we mostly already knew, despite the 2016 debacle: This rebuild was already well underway when the new Chief Baseball Officer and GM arrived. Most of the critical pieces had reached the big-league ranks and others were on the brink.

    It's just about the most favorable situation one can imagine walking into. For much of that, Falvey and Levine can thank their predecessor Terry Ryan and his colleagues, who assembled a great deal of talent.

    But while Ryan deserves credit for assembling much of this core, the "Boy Geniuses" (as my pal Clarence Swamptown blithely refers to them -- BeeGees for short) have given us plenty of indications that they're the right ones to bring it forward.

    The Deadline Dance

    Recently, I've seen some retrospective debate surrounding the front office's approach at the trade deadline. The critical argument goes like this: Falvey and Levine made a miscalculation by pivoting to seller mode and trading away assets, rather than adding, at the end of July. Regardless of the impact these moves had, the signal was one of resignation, and now it looks bad.

    This line of thinking doesn't really work for me, for two reasons:

    1) It wasn't really a "sell"

    They didn't trade Brian Dozier, or Ervin Santana. They gave up a starter they'd acquired a week earlier, and a reliever who proved nonessential. Good front office execs are opportunistic, and that's exactly how to describe these moves; the market for Jaime Garcia heated up as the Yankees developed a need, and Brandon Kintzler's value was at its absolute peak. Both are heading for free agency.

    And in fact, you can argue there's been significant overall benefit from removing them, as it opened the door for Kyle Gibson and Trevor Hildenberger – who will be around next year – to step into bigger roles and flourish.

    2) It was a perfectly reasonable strategy even if you want to call it a sell

    Look, we don't need to delve into playoff odds and percentages, which were dreadfully low as the Twins reached the end of July, trailing several teams in the race and playing uninspiring ball. An honest assessment showed at the time (and still shows) that this isn't a great team, not yet anyway.

    It would've been impossible to predict that laggards like Gibson and Jorge Polanco would suddenly take off while the rest of the American League completely folded, but the FO didn't do anything to sabotage the Twins' chances in such an event – obviously.

    In fact, I see Minnesota's deadline approach as a savvy one that avoided the pitfalls of this new postseason format. The addition of a second Wild Card slot means more teams are in the mix, and this compels clubs to make "Buy" moves when they're not necessarily warranted*. The Royals traded prospects to acquire Trevor Cahill and Melky Cabrera. The Angels made deals in August to acquire Justin Upton and Brandon Phillips. All of this got them nowhere. Meanwhile, the Twins – who are at the front end of their winning cycle – added future assets and will still get their shot. Falvey and Levine come away from this looking pretty good.

    * As a middling club aiming for a WC berth, you're still facing serious uphill odds with a one-game play-in for the chance to face superior teams in the Division and League Championship Series. I like the system but it begs for a merely solid team to sacrifice long-term thinking in order to chase that tiny chance. Given their position, the Twins were wise to steer clear of this trap.

    Putting Pieces in Place

    How much did the execs influence the team's success this year? It's tough to measure, but I think we can safely say they had a positive impact.

    As mentioned before, the Twins' turnaround was largely driven by players brought into the organization by Ryan and even Bill Smith. Meanwhile, the same manager is running the show. But the dramatic improvement in on-field results has likely been facilitated in some ways by the new regime.

    For one thing, there were free agent signings like Jason Castro and Matt Belisle. Castro has proven a very solid addition, helping the pitching staff with his strong framing work, while Belisle has been brilliant in the ninth, negating the absence of Kintzler.

    Perhaps more importantly, there were organizational changes and coaching staff additions like James Rowson and Jeff Pickler. I don't think it's coincidence that so many young hitters are suddenly turning corners, or that the Twins have suddenly catapulted to the top tier of MLB defenses, with these two handpicked coaches in the dugout.

    Moreover, Levine has mostly pulled the right roster strings throughout the summer, showing a refreshing willingness to shuttle players in and out as needed, and to experiment with a multitude of arms to see what works.

    Through it all, decisions have seemingly been guided by evidence, data, and good intelligence. I'm not confident these guys will always make the right calls – no one does. But I am feeling confident that those calls will be well-informed and guided by the three things mentioned above. My interactions with Falvey and Levine, and everything they've done and said, reinforces the team's decision and leads me to believe this beautiful gift is in very good hands.

    And make no mistake: it is a beautiful gift. The Twins have one of the best and youngest offenses in the game, with every member of a top-tier lineup locked in for next year. They have a strong farm system, with a pipeline ready to deliver. And they also have significant spending freedom on the horizon, with Joe Mauer's $23 million coming off the books next year and minimal contractual commitments beyond that.

    Lefty Gomez once said, "I'd rather be lucky than good."

    Why not both?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    And this is the key point...the Twins were in it, had been in it all season, and had a very reasonable chance of staying in it.

    After a half decade of suck.

    Don't sell. Add.

    Add what at what cost?  A trade like the Jepson trade a couple of years back? Sonny Gray? Do you suppose the Twins could have offered a pile of non prospects to entice what the Yankees offered in ceiling? 

     

     

    Yeah this was stated by several posters at the deadline after the trade.  The "believers" felt the Twins could stay in the wild card until the end.  I don't think anyone predicted they would win it but that they could stay in the hunt.  So that thought was shared by many.  

     

    I just feel like people have selective memory and don't remember how dire things were.  Polanco was in a major slump.  Buxton couldn't hit anything. Kepler was slumping. Dozier had not had a great first half.  Sano was striking out more at the plate and coming back to earth.  Gibson was awful and the bullpen only had three guys they could depend on.  To me at that point in time is not a team that stops me from selling.

     

    Yeah a lot of things changed for the better after that but could you have seen it coming? I doubt it because I never saw any posts about any of it until after players started coming around.  Even with everything that has been said in the end the FO made the best decision because we made the wild card without Kintzler.  Maybe they could see something that everyone else could not.  That he wasn't going to be the difference between making the wild card or not.

    With 21 games against 3 of the worse teams in baseball on the remaining schedule and only 12 games better teams on July 31 anybody who bothered to read a schedule  could see that there was  an excellent chance for a playoff birth. 

     

    Have you seen the Angels pitching staff? Ricky Nolasco? As of late July, they were pinning their hopes on the healthy return of Alex Meyer. That was supposed to intimidate the Twins into selling?

    I feel like you keep bringing up hypotheticals that don't match anything the Twins should have known about the field as of July 30.

     

    As opposed to Colon and Gibson, who before he went on his run was a DFA candidate?

     

    The Twins weren't all that good. The other teams weren't all that good. But making multi-million dollar decisions about years of players can't be done on the assumption that only your team is going to all of a sudden play well, and nearly every other team is going to play worse. That's not a good process.

     

    If we are going to be pedantic about "fold", choose a different word for "every other team playing worse".

     

    Add what at what cost?  A trade like the Jepson trade a couple of years back? Sonny Gray? Do you suppose the Twins could have offered a pile of non prospects to entice what the Yankees offered in ceiling? 

     

    Weird how the Twins, in what, 20 years, have never once had the players to trade for a legit pitcher. Weird how other teams do find a way. 

    With 21 games against 3 of the worse teams in baseball on the remaining schedule and only 12 games better teams on July 31 anybody who bothered to read a schedule could see that there was an excellent chance for a playoff birth.

    No, which is why no prediction models had the Twins with a good chance of a berth.

     

    It’s easy to look at stuff like the Tigers’ record today and assume they were always that terrible. But the Tigers were ten games under .500 at the deadline. Fewer than two months later, they are 33 games under .500 and that is AFTER they won four straight games from Aug 1-4.

     

    Baseball is a silly sport. Oakland and Detroit were basically the same team at the deadline. Pretty bad but not horrific. Both sold significant pieces.

     

    Detroit went 23 games under .500 down the stretch. Oakland went one game OVER .500.

     

    With 21 games against 3 of the worse teams in baseball on the remaining schedule and only 12 games better teams on July 31 anybody who bothered to read a schedule  could see that there was  an excellent chance for a playoff birth. 

    I guess fangraphs and all the supposed experts are schmucks then because they sure didn't see "it" coming.

     

    Both Gibson and Hildenberger would have gotten similar if not identical opportunities even if the Twins ADDED pitching. Check the list of pitchers used.

     

    Hildy at some point, I would tend to agree (though the question at hand becomes when). But I don't buy Gibby.

     

    Gibby was downright awful prior to that, and it was his spot in the rotation we all wanted to replace.

     

    With 21 games against 3 of the worse teams in baseball on the remaining schedule and only 12 games better teams on July 31 anybody who bothered to read a schedule  could see that there was  an excellent chance for a playoff birth. 

     

    Really, at that point you would have bet money at less than 1:1 odds that they'd make the playoffs?

     

    And, you'd have made that bet in July, when the Twins had to make a decision also?

    Edited by Mike Sixel

    Hildy at some point, I would tend to agree (though the question at hand becomes when). But I don't buy Gibby.

     

    Gibby was downright awful prior to that, and it was his spot in the rotation we all wanted to replace.

    And if there was another option available, literally ANY option at all, it’s hard to see Molitor taking Gibby back at any point. The distaste Paul had for Kyle was obvious.

     

    What team in that group would you have forecast to have great post-July 30 success? None of those teams had a good case of separating from the pack.

    Maybe it's unusual that there is so much mediocrity in the AL now, but there is. And that was apparent in July. Didn't mean the Twins had a great chance, but it meant they had a decent chance. And the Twins FO should be expected to know that and not disregard, even if historically unusual.

    No group was forecast to have great success based on what we knew July 29th or so but here is what we did know:

     

    1. The Twins' peripherals were of a team 8-10 games under .500, not a .500 team.

    2. The Twins had one of the worst pitching staffs in the AL.

    3. The Twins had dropped like a rock in the standings in the two weeks leading to the deadline.

    4. Other teams, such as KC, were coming on strong (whether it would last or not is certainly debatable).

    5. The Twins front office had to assume at least one of the teams in front of the Twins would buy, improving their chances.

    6. If you did every single thing right, you'd earn a single play-in game, likely on the road.

     

    To me, that looks like a selling situation. It did at the time and it still does now. I can see some frustration over the Kintzler move but I would have done the same thing (and advocated it) so I'm certainly not going to complain about it now.

    If we are going to be pedantic about "fold", choose a different word for "every other team playing worse".

    Good point.

     

    Instead of "fold", I chose to describe those competing teams as "didn't make a run" and I called it surprising that other teams didn't make a run, although I think the Angles did make a good run at it, until their schedule got difficult.

     

    Good point.

    Instead of "fold", I chose to describe those competing teams as "didn't make a run" and I called it surprising that other teams didn't make a run, although I think the Angles did make a good run at it, until their schedule got difficult.

     

    Not sure what happened to Trout and Upton....Twins caught a break there for sure. OTOH, I think the Twins did grab it and run with it (though that could be narrative playing in my head)....

    Not sure what happened to Trout and Upton....Twins caught a break there for sure. OTOH, I think the Twins did grab it and run with it (though that could be narrative playing in my head)....

    They have been a tight clubhouse all year, and I think they did all rally together when the FO traded Kintzler.

     

    As opposed to Colon and Gibson, who before he went on his run was a DFA candidate?

     

    The Twins weren't all that good. The other teams weren't all that good. But making multi-million dollar decisions about years of players can't be done on the assumption that only your team is going to all of a sudden play well, and nearly every other team is going to play worse. That's not a good process.

     

    If we are going to be pedantic about "fold", choose a different word for "every other team playing worse".

    I never said the Twins were definitively better than the Angels.  Point is, they weren't definitively worse, than them or any of the 2nd wild card contenders as of July 30.  And the only one that had anything resembling a definitive record advantage as of that date was the Royals, a team whose weaknesses we knew well and he had a lot of head-to-head games with which to make up ground (which we ultimately didn't even need).

     

    And I think I clarified in a later post -- we didn't need to suddenly play well AND every other team to play worse.  That happened, and we won fairly comfortably by 5 games.  We really only needed one of those things to happen, or some mildly version of both, to stay in the race until the end.

     

    I never said the Twins were definitively better than the Angels.  Point is, they weren't definitively worse, than them or any of the 2nd wild card contenders as of July 30.  And the only one that had anything resembling a definitive record advantage as of that date was the Royals, a team whose weaknesses we knew well and he had a lot of head-to-head games with which to make up ground (which we ultimately didn't even need).

     

    And I think I clarified in a later post -- we didn't need to suddenly play well AND every other team to play worse.  That happened, and we won fairly comfortably by 5 games.  We really only needed one of those things to happen, or some mildly version of both, to stay in the race until the end.

     

    And staying in the WC race for the 2nd spot is worth keeping a 7th-8th inning RP over? That's kind of the point.....Kintzler isn't the delta between the Twins and being legit. He was a FA. They got a player and 500K in international money for him. That should buy a decent prospect or three, in addition to the player they got.

     

    No group was forecast to have great success based on what we knew July 29th or so but here is what we did know:

     

    1. The Twins' peripherals were of a team 8-10 games under .500, not a .500 team.

    2. The Twins had one of the worst pitching staffs in the AL.

    3. The Twins had dropped like a rock in the standings in the two weeks leading to the deadline.

    4. Other teams, such as KC, were coming on strong (whether it would last or not is certainly debatable).

    5. The Twins front office had to assume at least one of the teams in front of the Twins would buy, improving their chances.

    6. If you did every single thing right, you'd earn a single play-in game, likely on the road.

     

    To me, that looks like a selling situation. It did at the time and it still does now. I can see some frustration over the Kintzler move but I would have done the same thing (and advocated it) so I'm certainly not going to complain about it now.

    1 & 2. Our team composition was changing. Buxton was showing up, Gibson wasn't going to be THAT bad, etc. Not enough to make us world-beaters, of course, but certainly enough that we could hang with that mediocre competition.

     

    3. Our now-bWAR leader Buxton, who had been heating up at the plate at the beginning of July, missed the last 2 weeks of that month.  Even so, 2 weeks before the deadline, we took 2 of 3 from the Yankees.  We actually won a game in Houston. Our final 3 losses in July were 1-run walk-off losses, which suggests some bad luck.  Buxton returned August 1st.

     

    4. "Teams" plural coming on strong?  Outside of the top 4 in the AL, I think it was just the Royals among the 2nd wild card contenders that could be characterized as "coming on strong".  And of course that was based on a 9 game win streak, 8 of which came against Detroit and the White Sox (including 3 walk off wins, which suggest some good luck). And we knew they were limited, had restrictions on buying, and still had to play us a bunch head-to-head.

     

    July records

    KCR 16 10
    SEA 14 12

    OAK 12 14

    TBR 12 13

    DET 12 14

    BAL 12 14

    TOR 12 15

    TEX 11 14

    MIN 10 15

    LAA 9 13

     

    Not a great month, but nothing that screams to me "fear the Royals! Sell!"

     

    5. Every team in that group had some severe limitations to buying, at least buying enough to discourage potential competitors. If they weren't discouraged by us buying Jaime Garcia, why should we be discouraged by them buying Jeremy Hellickson or Trevor Cahill?

     

    6. I assume by "play in game" you are referring to the wild card game?  If so, it's a postseason berth. While teams would obviously prefer to win the division, I think teams still take the wild card, even the 2nd spot, pretty seriously.

    Edited by spycake

     

    And staying in the WC race for the 2nd spot is worth keeping a 7th-8th inning RP over? That's kind of the point.....Kintzler isn't the delta between the Twins and being legit. He was a FA. They got a player and 500K in international money for him. That should buy a decent prospect or three, in addition to the player they got.

    Rarely is one player the "delta between being legit".  And if you want to argue that, Kintzler in a WC race is a lot closer to being a meaningful "delta" than Watson or a late international signing will likely be.

     

    And the trade return is almost immaterial to this debate.  The only evidence we have at this point suggests it was a fair market return, neither a fleecing nor being fleeced.  If the Twins turn out a hidden gem in Watson or in a late international signing, I'll be sure to revisit this, but for now I have to assume they were just fair market pieces for renting Kintzler for a playoff chase.  And in that case, I think I'd rather take my chances with Kintzler in that chase.

    This was the post from John Bonnes after the Kintzler trade.

     

    ""This likely won't be a very popular opinion, but the Twins gave up on this year for maybe five guys who:
    a. probably don't rank in the top 15 in their organization and
    b. probably don't rank in the top 300 in the minors and
    c. likely will make little to no difference in their future?

    That's what Littell, Enns, & Watson are, right? And given the reliever market (which we just saw for Kintzler), they certainly wouldn't have needed to give up much to add a couple of competent relievers.

    I know it's been a tough week, but this was a mistake. I don't get why they wouldn't ride it and chance the 9% chance they hat making the playoffs. It feels like panic. What did we gain exactly for giving up?"

     

    This article was liked by the following members: hybridbear peterb18 bighat Dave The Dastardly Raven J DaveW whydidnt Hosken Bombo Disco Jerr Highabove shimrod Vanimal46 ChiTownTwinsFan USAFChief pbrezeasap gunnarthor Mike Sixel.

     

    I assume all those posters felt that after the Kintzler trade there was no way the Twins were going to make the post season.  At least that is how I read it.  No one thought the Twins had a chance after the trade and also felt that the Twins needed to add to have a chance. 

     

    In the end everyone except the FO was wrong because they made the post season without Kintzler.  So I guess I fail to see the angst for that trade.  Would it be good to have a better bullpen right now sure but was that going to be enough to move the needle enough in the post season matchups?  I don't think so, but I am sure you could make a case.  Also you would have probably had to give up someone like Hildy or Bussy or more to get a couple of two month rentals.  I think the FO did ok on this one.

     

    This article was liked by the following members: hybridbear peterb18 bighat Dave The Dastardly Raven J DaveW whydidnt Hosken Bombo Disco Jerr Highabove shimrod Vanimal46 ChiTownTwinsFan USAFChief pbrezeasap gunnarthor Mike Sixel.

     

    I assume all those posters felt that after the Kintzler trade there was no way the Twins were going to make the post season.  At least that is how I read it.  No one thought the Twins had a chance after the trade and also felt that the Twins needed to add to have a chance. 

    Please let's not resort to this kind of argument.  "Likes" for long articles do not mean agreement and especially not full agreement with every point in the article, or whatever conclusions you are now inferring from the article.

     

    The Twins weren't likely to make the postseason after the trade.  But they weren't likely to make the postseason just before the trade either.  Depending on your threshold for "likely" it could be argued that no team was particularly likely to win the 2nd wild card (tops in the Fangraphs "coin flip" odds was 28%), but we knew that one of them would, and a few would stay close until late.  Some of us just wanted to be best positioned to stay in the race, and best compete if we did happen to make it.

    Edited by spycake

     

    This was the post from John Bonnes after the Kintzler trade.

     

    ""This likely won't be a very popular opinion, but the Twins gave up on this year for maybe five guys who:
    a. probably don't rank in the top 15 in their organization and
    b. probably don't rank in the top 300 in the minors and
    c. likely will make little to no difference in their future?

    That's what Littell, Enns, & Watson are, right? And given the reliever market (which we just saw for Kintzler), they certainly wouldn't have needed to give up much to add a couple of competent relievers.

    I know it's been a tough week, but this was a mistake. I don't get why they wouldn't ride it and chance the 9% chance they hat making the playoffs. It feels like panic. What did we gain exactly for giving up?"

     

    This article was liked by the following members: hybridbear peterb18 bighat Dave The Dastardly Raven J DaveW whydidnt Hosken Bombo Disco Jerr Highabove shimrod Vanimal46 ChiTownTwinsFan USAFChief pbrezeasap gunnarthor Mike Sixel.

     

    I assume all those posters felt that after the Kintzler trade there was no way the Twins were going to make the post season.  At least that is how I read it.  No one thought the Twins had a chance after the trade and also felt that the Twins needed to add to have a chance. 

     

    In the end everyone except the FO was wrong because they made the post season without Kintzler.  So I guess I fail to see the angst for that trade.  Would it be good to have a better bullpen right now sure but was that going to be enough to move the needle enough in the post season matchups?  I don't think so, but I am sure you could make a case.  Also you would have probably had to give up someone like Hildy or Bussy or more to get a couple of two month rentals.  I think the FO did ok on this one.

     

    I like lots of stuff I don't agree with. I've made that clear on many occasions. 

     

    Please let's not resort to this kind of argument.  "Likes" for long articles do not mean agreement and especially not full agreement with every point in the article, or whatever conclusions you are now inferring from the article.

     

    The Twins weren't likely to make the postseason after the trade.  But they weren't likely to make the postseason just before the trade either.  Depending on your threshold for "likely" it could be argued that no team was particularly likely to win the 2nd wild card (tops in the Fangraphs "coin flip" odds was 28%), but we knew that one of them would, and a few would stay close until late.  Some of us just wanted to be best positioned to stay in the race, and best compete if we did happen to make it.

    And I concede that the people that wanted to stay in the race were correct for believing in this team.  I sure didn't think they would make it.  All I am saying is that they did make the Playoffs even without Kintzler.  Maybe the FO did give up on the team or maybe they felt Kintzer wasn't going to be the difference I don't know their thinking I just don't think they deserve much criticism for the decision.

     

    If the Twins beat New York and lose some close games in the bullpen in the next series I will eat my words and concede I wish the FO would have done more.  To me this team does not match up well with Houston or Cleveland and certainly doesn't have those teams depth. 

     

    This has been awesome year of Twins BB.  I am shocked at where they are.  We just agree to disagree on how the FO handled things.

     

    I like lots of stuff I don't agree with. I've made that clear on many occasions. 

    Not trying to call anyone out.  Just trying to make a point that I felt a lot of people gave up hope when Kintzler was traded.  I guess I could have just written down the number 15. I just wanted to point out how a lot of people felt about it.

    This was the post from John Bonnes after the Kintzler trade.

     

    ""This likely won't be a very popular opinion, but the Twins gave up on this year for maybe five guys who:

    a. probably don't rank in the top 15 in their organization and

    b. probably don't rank in the top 300 in the minors and

    c. likely will make little to no difference in their future?

    That's what Littell, Enns, & Watson are, right? And given the reliever market (which we just saw for Kintzler), they certainly wouldn't have needed to give up much to add a couple of competent relievers.

    I know it's been a tough week, but this was a mistake. I don't get why they wouldn't ride it and chance the 9% chance they hat making the playoffs. It feels like panic. What did we gain exactly for giving up?"

     

    This article was liked by the following members: hybridbear peterb18 bighat Dave The Dastardly Raven J DaveW whydidnt Hosken Bombo Disco Jerr Highabove shimrod Vanimal46 ChiTownTwinsFan USAFChief pbrezeasap gunnarthor Mike Sixel.

     

    I assume all those posters felt that after the Kintzler trade there was no way the Twins were going to make the post season.  At least that is how I read it.  No one thought the Twins had a chance after the trade and also felt that the Twins needed to add to have a chance. 

     

    In the end everyone except the FO was wrong because they made the post season without Kintzler.  So I guess I fail to see the angst for that trade.  Would it be good to have a better bullpen right now sure but was that going to be enough to move the needle enough in the post season matchups?  I don't think so, but I am sure you could make a case.  Also you would have probably had to give up someone like Hildy or Bussy or more to get a couple of two month rentals.  I think the FO did ok on this one.

    I felt the Kintzler trade hurt their chances, but didn't kill their chances. It feels like 7-dimensional chess to think F & L knew that trading Kintzler would put the team back in the WC race.

     

    I like you did that research, by the way.

     

    I felt the Kintzler trade hurt their chances, but didn't kill their chances. It feels like 7-dimensional chess to think F & L knew that trading Kintzler would put the team back in the WC race.

    I like you did that research, by the way.

    I guess my assumption was poor.  Sorry to put words in your mouth.  I personally don't think anyone knew what was going to happen but this team answered the challenge.

     

    And I concede that the people that wanted to stay in the race were correct for believing in this team.  I sure didn't think they would make it.  All I am saying is that they did make the Playoffs even without Kintzler.  Maybe the FO did give up on the team or maybe they felt Kintzer wasn't going to be the difference I don't know their thinking I just don't think they deserve much criticism for the decision.

     

    If the Twins beat New York and lose some close games in the bullpen in the next series I will eat my words and concede I wish the FO would have done more.  To me this team does not match up well with Houston or Cleveland and certainly doesn't have those teams depth. 

     

    This has been awesome year of Twins BB.  I am shocked at where they are.  We just agree to disagree on how the FO handled things.

    We're on a baseball message board -- of course the front office deserves some criticism! :)

     

    I concede that they made the 2nd wild card and didn't need Kintzler to do it.  The loss of Kintzler may not be a factor next week either but I'd feel better going in if we still had him.  Ultimately my concern won't be so much about the results though as the process. And I'm not sticking a fork in the FO or anything either, it's just a concern that rises a bit above simple disagreement for me.

     

    But yeah, it's been a great year so far, I've had fun following and discussing this team.

    Trading Kintzler and Garcia wasn't intended to make this team better and it hasn't. It was intended to make the organisation stronger in the long term, which meant giving up on the short term. I was disappointed then and I am now,  in the fact they seemed to misjudge their team and their rivals to that extent and made that decision. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Weird how the Twins, in what, 20 years, have never once had the players to trade for a legit pitcher. Weird how other teams do find a way. 

    Weird how I only commented on this year and get blasted for past years. This management group has been only at here for this year. The comment I responded to was about this year. So please come up what would  have worked for this year, 

     

    No, which is why no prediction models had the Twins with a good chance of a berth.

    It’s easy to look at stuff like the Tigers’ record today and assume they were always that terrible. But the Tigers were ten games under .500 at the deadline. Fewer than two months later, they are 33 games under .500 and that is AFTER they won four straight games from Aug 1-4.

     

    Baseball is a silly sport. Oakland and Detroit were basically the same team at the deadline. Pretty bad but not horrific. Both sold significant pieces.

     

    Detroit went 23 games under .500 down the stretch. Oakland went one game OVER .500.

    Oakland had a replacement for Alonso. It also had a far more difficult first half of the schedule than last half. The models may or may not account for who tou play or how you have played that team in the past.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...