Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The 7 Biggest Decisions for the Twins’ Offseason: Trading Joe Ryan

    Minnesota has plenty of reasons to keep Joe Ryan, but the right trade could reshape a roster that needs improvement in several areas.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins entered the 2026 season expecting Joe Ryan to anchor their starting rotation. He was coming off his first All-Star season, had established himself as one of the American League’s top starters, and remained under team control through 2027.

    Things didn't go according to plan. Ryan battled injuries and struggled during the second half of the season. He finished the year after missing time with a left glute strain. For the season, he posted a 3.79 ERA (112 ERA+) with 159 strikeouts and 31 walks over 144 2/3 innings.

    Now the Twins have a decision to make. Minnesota is open to trading one of its starting pitchers this offseason, with Ryan, Bailey Ober, Pablo López and Dean Kremer all entering the final year of their current team-control windows. General manager Jeremy Zoll specifically discussed the possibility of turning pitching depth into help elsewhere on the roster.

    That makes Ryan one of the seven biggest decisions facing the Twins this winter.

    The Pros of Trading Joe Ryan

    The biggest argument for trading Ryan is that the Twins need help in other areas. Minnesota has a considerable amount of starting pitching depth. Ryan, Ober, López, Kremer, Taj Bradley, Connor Prielipp, Zebby Matthews and Mick Abel all could factor into the rotation next season. That doesn't mean all eight will be healthy or effective, but it does give Zoll something the organization desperately needs: options.

    If another team values Ryan more highly than Minnesota does, the Twins could turn one starting pitcher into multiple pieces for a roster with other holes. Ryan also has significant trade appeal because of his track record. He’s been an All-Star (or borderline All-Star) for multiple seasons while averaging a 111 ERA+, 3.81 FIP, and 2.6 rWAR since 2022.  

    Even after his difficult second half, opposing teams would have plenty of reasons to believe in a rebound. The Twins could also be selling before Ryan reaches free agency after the 2027 season. If Minnesota believes Ryan's value is unlikely to increase significantly over the next year, this could be the opportunity to maximize his trade value.

    The Cons of Trading Joe Ryan

    The obvious problem is that good starting pitching is difficult to find. Trading Ryan would remove a pitcher who has already demonstrated that he can be a quality major-league starter. Even if his 2026 season wasn't what anyone wanted, there is still a strong argument that the Twins should bet on a bounce-back campaign rather than sell low.

    There is also risk in assuming that the current depth will remain intact. López and Abel are returning from elbow surgery. Prielipp has battled injuries throughout his professional career. Matthews has yet to establish himself as a consistent major-league starter. Ober continues to struggle with velocity. 

    Suddenly, that impressive depth chart can look much thinner. There is another consideration: Ryan's value may not be particularly high right now. I recently noted that injuries and his second-half struggles complicated what had once been a straightforward trade decision.

    Trading him simply because the Twins have too many pitchers would make little sense if the return doesn't address a significant need. The organization also needs to determine whether it is trying to compete in 2027. If the answer is yes, removing an established starter creates another problem that Zoll must solve.

    What Would the Timeline Look Like?

    The Twins shouldn't feel pressure to trade Ryan simply for the sake of making a move. The best opportunity could come early in the offseason, particularly if another club loses a starter in free agency or decides it needs rotation help. Minnesota can listen to offers before the market fully develops and determine whether Ryan's value is strong enough to justify a trade.

    The timing of this offseason could be particularly important because the collective bargaining agreement is set to expire December 1, creating the possibility of a lockout. Zoll has already indicated that Minnesota doesn't intend to sit around waiting for the offseason to develop. 

    That makes the weeks before the potential lockout especially important. If the Twins receive a significant offer, they could move Ryan before December 1. If the offers aren't compelling, there is little reason to force the issue.

    Minnesota could also revisit the situation after the lockout or closer to spring training. A team could lose a starter to injury, miss out on a free agent, or decide it needs another rotation arm. Those developments could change Ryan's market. The key is patience.

    Trading Joe Ryan would be one of the biggest moves Jeremy Zoll could make during his first full offseason running the Twins' baseball operations department. There are legitimate reasons to consider it. Minnesota has starting-pitching depth, Ryan has only one potential season of control remaining after 2026, and the Twins need to improve other areas of the roster.

    But there are equally legitimate reasons to keep him. Ryan is only 29 years old, has already shown the ability to pitch at an All-Star level, and could be poised for a bounce-back season. Trading him after a difficult second half could also mean selling at a less-than-ideal moment.

    The question isn't simply whether the Twins should trade Ryan. The bigger question is what another team would be willing to give up for him. If the return can address one of Minnesota's biggest weaknesses while maintaining the organization's ability to compete in 2027, Zoll will have a fascinating decision to make. If not, keeping Ryan and betting on a rebound might be the better path for a team that still needs quality starting pitching.

    Either way, Ryan's name belongs near the top of the Twins' offseason decision list.


    Will the Twins trade Ryan this winter? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    53 minutes ago, TopGunn#22 said:

    If Boston is willing to give up Tolle for Ryan I'd pull the trigger. 

    You think Boston is trading soon to be 24 year old that was their starter in game 1 of the playoffs, Pitched 148 innings this year with an ERA of 3.03 and have locked up for the next 5 years for 30 year old soon to be free agent? 

    If they would you jump at the chance, but I would give it between 0 -1 percent chance of happening. 

     

    41 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Joe Ryan won't bring back any significant return. Cuts $12MM for a team that should be adding payroll, not cutting it. 

    Are you saying that both things can't be done? I don't think anybody has said trade him to save 12 million. And you are probably correct they won't get anybody that will help them next year, that wouldn't be reason the trade him, you trade him because you have an asset that will likely be gone next year and will have got nothing for it.. Using your words - That is Stupid

    All this talk every year. well it's got one year left on his contract. it's coming up free agent time for this player. Whoever drafts him you have to let him go or sign him before the end of his contract. players used to be tied to the team that drafted them unless they get traded. so all this worry about lets trade so we get something for him because he's going to be gone after this year like Jeffers I've never liked it. lots of times they don't want to go but they can make a lot more money playing for somebody else so they're in lies the problem for Minnesota. it's no longer a team game. it's a money game. Harmon Killerbrew played his last season with Kansas City. The owners could make crazy money in that situation so I think there should have been some kind of compromise on how much owners can make and overages of that amount distributed to the players. No free agency. That worked for about 100 years.

    This organization needs to start thinking like the Brewers and Rays they are not the Yankees or Dodgers. Falvey tried bringing big money FA's in and how did that work out. Ryan will be a FA at the end of the 27 season and will not be interested in signing a team friendly deal. Why would you hold on to a player that will be gone. They just did that with Jeffers and hopefully they learned a lesson. With his history of fading in the second half his value could be less a the deadline.

    1 hour ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    Are you saying that both things can't be done? I don't think anybody has said trade him to save 12 million. And you are probably correct they won't get anybody that will help them next year, that wouldn't be reason the trade him, you trade him because you have an asset that will likely be gone next year and will have got nothing for it.. Using your words - That is Stupid

    I'm saying trading Joe Ryan on his own cannot be expected to make a significant improvement to the Twins organization in any way for next year, and probably not for any future year because he has no meaningful trade value and cutting his salary makes no meaningful impact on what should be the payroll capacity of the team.

    I'm expecting Joe Ryan to pitch next year. That's something because teams pay players to play baseball. That's why Joe Ryan has trade value in the first place. The team acquiring him also would expect him to play baseball. Teams do not pay players to have surplus trade asset value. 

    Trading just to trade is stupid. There needs to be an objective, and the objective should be to have a World Series winning team in my opinion. Trading Joe Ryan on his own cannot be expected to make a meaningful impact on what should be that objective. Not this year, next year or 10 years from now.

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    Trading just to trade is stupid. There needs to be an objective, and the objective should be to have a World Series winning team in my opinion. Trading Joe Ryan on his own cannot be expected to make a meaningful impact on what should be that objective. Not this year, next year or 10 years from now.

    Haven't heard anybody say to trade him just to trade him, I am pretty most are saying to trade him for prospect or two that may in a couple years and be under team control for multiple years, some are saying that opens up a spot in the rotation for younger guy, FA, and/or maybe somebody they can trade for. 

    I don't see how keeping him next year with the current roster helps meet your objective of a world series team unless of course they can extend him, then that changes things (I wouldn't do that, but it would change some of the additional things I would like to see done) 

    I most certainly want them to spend any money they would save by trading him and more, the added bonus would be the prospects they get. 

    One example and there are probably others would like more (and probably are correct), but lets they offer him 3/50 and he turns it down, Offer that to Bieber, and trade Ryan, even it is for something like SWR and Martin, worse case the results are the same if he stays and the two guys flame out. But the upside is unlimited, guys that maybe help or guys that could be added in a another trade to upgrade the team when another hole opens up. 

    1 hour ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    Haven't heard anybody say to trade him just to trade him, I am pretty most are saying to trade him for prospect or two that may in a couple years and be under team control for multiple years...

    And what 1 mid-level or 2 long shot prospects are you willing to bet on being valuable players in the future? That's a rhetorical question. The answer is "none."

    Sure, the Twins "might" get lucky and one of those unranked prospects works out, but they're unranked because nobody actually expects them to be good. A Henry Mendez or Khadim Diaw level guy is what we'd get back. If you want 2, it's a Ben Ross + Brandon Winokur like trade.

    Ryan should have been traded two years ago.  In over 50 second half starts for the Twins, Ryan has posted an ERA over 5.  Hes great the first half but not someone you can count on as an ace during a pennant drive.  Buxton apparently after this MLB season only has a 5 team no trade clause for the final 2 years of his contract.  Not a total no trade clause.  Get rid of him too.  He causes way too many roster problems.  Im not confident in Zoll.

    24 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    And what 1 mid-level or 2 long shot prospects are you willing to bet on being valuable players in the future? That's a rhetorical question. The answer is "none."

    Sure, the Twins "might" get lucky and one of those unranked prospects works out, but they're unranked because nobody actually expects them to be good. A Henry Mendez or Khadim Diaw level guy is what we'd get back. If you want 2, it's a Ben Ross + Brandon Winokur like trade.

    Why do you want to keep him so bad? If the option would be those two or guys or he walks away for nothing, I would take a chance on those two guys. But like I said I paying for his replacement. 

    26 minutes ago, Whitey333 said:

    Ryan should have been traded two years ago.  In over 50 second half starts for the Twins, Ryan has posted an ERA over 5.  Hes great the first half but not someone you can count on as an ace during a pennant drive.  Buxton apparently after this MLB season only has a 5 team no trade clause for the final 2 years of his contract.  Not a total no trade clause.  Get rid of him too.  He causes way too many roster problems.  Im not confident in Zoll.

    Buxton has full 10 and 5 rights - full no trade. 

    1 hour ago, Whitey333 said:

    Ryan should have been traded two years ago.  In over 50 second half starts for the Twins, Ryan has posted an ERA over 5.  Hes great the first half but not someone you can count on as an ace during a pennant drive.  Buxton apparently after this MLB season only has a 5 team no trade clause for the final 2 years of his contract.  Not a total no trade clause.  Get rid of him too.  He causes way too many roster problems.  Im not confident in Zoll.

    Buxton is a five and ten guy so he gets a veto of any potential trade he'd be involved in.  

     

    Edit: Ninja'd, but it's worth saying twice around here.

    On 10/1/2026 at 5:56 PM, Maybe Next Year said:

    Good grief - the writers on Twins Daily are hell bent on trading Ryan, Larnach, Jeffers and Buxton (if Buc would agree to a trade). They are also constantly writing that Bailey Ober and Zebby Mathew’s are unreliable starters. Then consider that Pablo Lopez is coming off Tommy John surgery and there is no guarantee he will be the old Lopez. Abel and Prielipp are still unproven as being reliable and who knows which Kremer will show up? Why in the world would you trade Ryan? What holes are so damn bad that you would give up a bonafide All Star starter and for what, more prospects? Stupid, just plain stupid!

    10000% could not agree more. You dont trade a all star SP for prospects. people keep whining about not having a competative team but at the same time want to trade our best players. people need to make up their mind.

    I don't agree that's it's in the Twins best interest or that it's inevitable for them to trade Joe Ryan. As a matter of fact I believe that they should give it their best shot to extend him. He's fairly electric and he has adnirably held down the fort during Pablo's extended absence. Ryan actually deserves pay parity with Pablo. Perhaps the Twins should consider trading Pablo before the next trade deadline. After all, he'll be umproven post-surgery while Ryan has remained relatively healthy and has been underpaid for his overall efforts. Let's remember how Buck has been a no show year after yearwhich always seems to dash the hopes of the Twins fans. But if Ryan, Pablo & Buck & company can get on a roll during the same year then maybe just maybe the Twins fans will have something to look forward to. Joe is not your average pitcher and he shouldn't be paid as if he's an average pitcher. If the Twins have other holes then they'll just need to pay up in order to plug them. But don't expect Joe to be able to plug the holes in the dike all alone. He needs a healthy team behind him in order to work some of his magic. But I do think that he has enough voltage to beat any team at anytime. When it's do or die then he's my go to guy.  Go tell Zoll to consider trading Pablo, extending Ryan & paying him what he's worth. to keep him in TC for3 additional years.  He's not Berrios and shouldn't be treated like Berrios. Joe will be the test to see if the problem is with the Twins or if it's the fault of the players that they aren't being extended.  Or is Twins history going to repeat itself again with another "the Twins are too cheap to extend a deserving FA salary dump." 

    If Ryan is good enough to trade to "help fill holes" then he must be good enough to extend.   Why not just pay the man?  Who are the Twins waiting for & willing to extend, the 2nd coming of Sandy Koufax or Don Drysdale?                                                                                                                        

    19 hours ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    Why do you want to keep him so bad? If the option would be those two or guys or he walks away for nothing, I would take a chance on those two guys. But like I said I paying for his replacement. 

    I don't. I wanted Ryan traded the last 2 years when he had legitimate path altering value. He doesn't anymore.

    If Tom Pohlad is serious about being decisive, there are two directions ahead. 

    Trade every $10MM+ salary on the team and rebuild.

    or

    Cast off the guys who aren't good enough to be counted on as legtimate starters, and spend $80MM+ in free agency to create a legit WS competitive roster.

    This article is about how Joe Ryan represents some major decision for the Twins. He doesn't because trading him doesn't matter.

    I am 100% on board with trading him.  Cleveland and Rays do this all the time.  They trade their pitchers before they walk in FA hope that at least 1 of the guys they trade for turn out.  The only reason you would not is if you are going all in next year and willing trade away prospects to hope next year is your year, and nothing about this year shows we are ready to do that. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...