Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Pressly Paradox: Why Selling Relievers Is a Precarious Path

    It's easy to see the appeal of selling high on a volatile position at the trade deadline. But history tells us the Twins should tread carefully when it comes to dealing a controllable arm like Jhoan Durán or Griffin Jax.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Troy Taormina-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Trade deadline season is fully upon us, and the Minnesota Twins are considered by many (including opposing scouts who are flocking to Target Field) to be "open for business." Naturally, the team's assortment of controllable high-octane relief arms are known to be drawing a large share of the interest.  

    There is an undeniable logic behind selling high on relief pitchers at the deadline. Contending buyers feel a sense of urgency to shore up their rosters for the stretch, and bullpen help is always in high demand. This leads front offices to pay a premium for widely sought targets. Add in the volatility of relief pitchers in general, and you see why big offers can prove hard to resist.

    Jhoan Durán and Griffin Jax are undoubtedly drawing a steady steam of calls with the trade deadline now just days away. Probably Brock Stewart and Louie Varland as well. All are high performers with excellent raw stuff, all are free of injury flags at the moment, and all are controllable for multiple years beyond 2025. The Twins are in position to cash in right now in a big way, if they so choose. 

    Plenty of teams have benefited immensely in the past from taking advantage of moments like this. The most famous recent example would have to be Kansas City sending Aroldis Chapman to Texas in 2023, one month ahead of the deadline, receiving back a left-handed pitcher named Cole Ragans. The move worked out in the short-term for the Rangers, who won the World Series, but Ragans became Kansas City's ace almost immediately, helping propel them to the playoffs in 2024 for the first time in nine seasons. Seven years earlier, Chapman was also involved in a memorable win/win deadline swap, going from New York to the Cubs (where he also won a World Series) in exchange for Gleyber Torres

     

    The latter example is probably more pertinent to Minnesota's current situation, because back in 2016 Chapman was 28 and at the height of his powers. Even then, he was only a rental — the Yankees would re-sign him the following offseason — but New York still managed to score a prospect on his way to consensus top-10 global status. It took less than two years for Torres to become an All-Star regular in New York.

    Those are the kinds of precedents that illustrate why Minnesota's front office would be foolish not to keep an open mind about trading someone like Durán or Jax. The idea of acquiring a game-changing talent who could enter the mix within a relatively short timeframe is enticing, and Minnesota's probably got enough bullpen depth to survive without one of them, especially with Varland's emergence.

    But there's a downside and a cost to these types of moves also. Twins fans have seen that, up close and personally.

    I've written before about the Ryan Pressly trade, which I consider to be the most regrettable move this front office ever made. In 2018, Pressly was not quite fully established as an elite reliever but well on his way, with spectacular swing-and-miss numbers and swing rates. Still under control beyond the 2018 season, Pressly was an alluring target in the same vein as Durán or Jax — especially to an analytically driven team like Houston.

    The Astros made an offer that Derek Falvey and the Twins decided they could not refuse: hard-throwing right-hander Jorge Alcalá and athletic outfielder Gilberto Celestino. Neither of those prospects amounted to much in a Minnesota uniform. 

    Meanwhile, Pressly blossomed into an instant bullpen ace for the Astros. He posted a 0.77 ERA the rest of the way in 2018. More painfully, in 2019, which would have been his last year under control with the Twins, Pressly was an All-Star who dominated the late innings as Houston won 107 games and the pushed the World Series to seven games. That year's Twins team, of course, was the Bomba Squad, which one 101 games and the division but fell short in the postseason, in part, because their relievers posted a 9.00 ERA against the Yankees. 

    Man, could that 2019 team have used Ryan Pressly. I don't want to overstate things but it very well might have been the difference between getting swept out of the first round and making a deep run in the playoffs. That's a missed opportunity that will always gnaw away at me. Especially because the very next year, Minnesota's bullpen once again flopped in the playoffs, this time against Pressly's Astros as they cruised to yet another ALCS. While the Twins watched their season slip away with a 37-year-old Sergio Romo on the mound in crunch time, Pressly posted a 2.46 ERA and tallied four saves for the Astros as they marched through October yet again.

     

    I share these cautionary tales to underscore why trading any of their top relievers is a precarious path for the Twins, and far from a no-brainer even if the offers feel overwhelming. Dominant late-inning relievers are in short supply, and can make a difference when the stakes are highest like few other players. We've already seen that in the cases of Durán and Jax, whose contributions in tight games were instrumental when the Twins finally broke through and won a playoff series in 2023.

    I'm personally not quite ready to give up on this 2025 season, as sour as the outlook may be right now. I fully understand why anyone would be, including the front office as they evaluate their options and their future. But 2026 is very much still in play, with all the requisite pieces in place to put an aspirational World Series contender on the field, led by Pablo López, Joe Ryan, Byron Buxton, Royce Lewis and a hopefully rebounding Carlos Correa. Having a stable of high-end relievers to support this group will be vital to maximizing the opportunity. Subtract from it at your own risk.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

    I could cite many multiple examples of trades that don't work out.  I could do the same for trades that do work out.  I can tell you this much though, if you trade pitching you'll find yourself in a position of needing pitching.  Seems kind of foolish.

    I can agree with you.  I"m just saying that to reject the idea of making a trade just because a similar one seven years ago didn't work out well, also seems foolish.

    The discourse regarding trading veterans for prospects on Twins Daily confuses me... feels like people are saying "it's too risky to trade proven talent for unknown prospects" but then on the flip side I also see the idea that sellers inherently gain more values from these trades and we should hold onto our own prospects. Which is it? I know it's not the same people saying those two things, but sometimes it feels like it.

    The issue with the Pressly trade is A) he instantly became an elite reliever after making a tweak to his arsenal in Houston and B) our farm system poorly developed Alcala and Celestino / they were misvalued as prospects. The idea of trading a reliever for multiple prospects is fine if you're selling high (they weren't on Pressly) and they can fetch a good return. And I get that we shouldn't trust this front office to get the right return, but the flip side of that is not adding young talent to a farm system that needs it and Duran/Jax continue to pitch for a disappointing team that isn't built to win now or in the future. 

    I am mostly in favor of building a team from your own farm system especially in the case of teams with mid to lower payrolls year in and year out.  I think that the Twins had a very promising team starting this year that just didn't play out as well as expected.  I think the Twins have a promising outlook for "26" and "27" with Buck, CC, Jeffers, Lewis, Lee, Ryan, Lopez, Ober, Mathews and about 3/4 of our bullpen.  I am high on Jenkins and Keashcall being added next year along with some other of our own prospects.  By selling Jax or Duran for a good quality C and 1B I believe we positively round out the team.  The key is to get the most out our talent which did not happen this year.  I can see trading one of Wallner or Larnach but not both.  The managers job is to get the most out of his players and I haven't yet seen that out of Rocco except for "19".  Cannot sell on Ryan unless someone comes with a huge overpay and that would not be prospects.  Only a stud C and 1B with multiple years of control and prospects to boot.

    3 hours ago, terrydactyls said:

    I can agree with you.  I"m just saying that to reject the idea of making a trade just because a similar one seven years ago didn't work out well, also seems foolish.

    Also kind of foolish to overlook the fact that MANY similar ones in prior years haven't worked out.

    4 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

    Also kind of foolish to overlook the fact that MANY similar ones in prior years haven't worked out.

    The article was about a single trade.  If their were "MANY" (thanks Mr. President) similar trades, they should have been mentioned.

    1 hour ago, terrydactyls said:

    The article was about a single trade.  If their were "MANY" (thanks Mr. President) similar trades, they should have been mentioned.

    REALLY?  Would you like a list?  Or have you actually followed baseball for any portion of you life?

    On 7/25/2025 at 5:38 PM, Doc Lenz said:

    The Pressly trade was terrible but top five ever and number one for me was Aaron Hicks for JR Murphy. Unbelievable baseball acumen.

    Hicks had 2 good season with the Yankees which earned him a 7 year $70M contract where he was barely better than replacement level.....and played in less than 40% of games over those years.  Murphy was a bust and yes, they should have gotten more for him, but outside of 1.5 season in NY, he was a pretty average overpaid player.

    2 hours ago, SwainZag said:

    Hicks had 2 good season with the Yankees which earned him a 7 year $70M contract where he was barely better than replacement level.....and played in less than 40% of games over those years.  Murphy was a bust and yes, they should have gotten more for him, but outside of 1.5 season in NY, he was a pretty average overpaid player.

    And J R Murphy gave the Twins 26 games with a ,413 OPS. Thats it. Never held a job for a full season in MLB after that 1 Twins season either.

    That trade was a massive talent misjudgement. And massive is too weak an adjective but I can't think of a stronger one right now.

     

    9 hours ago, SwainZag said:

    Hicks had 2 good season with the Yankees which earned him a 7 year $70M contract where he was barely better than replacement level.....and played in less than 40% of games over those years.  Murphy was a bust and yes, they should have gotten more for him, but outside of 1.5 season in NY, he was a pretty average overpaid player.

    No matter how you slice it, it was unforgivable 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...