Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Minnesota Twins 2024 Position Analysis: Catcher


    Nick Nelson

    Pairing one of the best offensive catchers in baseball with a highly experienced and steady veteran backup, the Twins boast a setup behind the plate that most teams envy. 

    Our annual spring roster preview kicks off with a breakdown of Minnesota's outlook behind the plate.

    Image courtesy of Erik Williams and Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    I'm a believer that catchers play a vital role in their team's run prevention success – one that is underrated by what current statistics can measure. There are certain aspects of calling a game, building rapport with pitchers, and withstanding the sheer rigor of major-league catching that are hard to quantify, but undoubtedly impactful.

    Last year, the Twins used only two catchers all season, and both have strong defensive reputations. This inarguably factored into the success of the pitching staff all year long, and now Minnesota will carry forward some continuity, with the same duo in line to return and split time here in 2024.

    TWINS CATCHERS AT A GLANCE

    Starter: Ryan Jeffers
    Backup: Christian Vázquez
    Depth: Jair Camargo, Brian O'Keefe (NRI), Patrick Winkel (NRI)
    Prospects: Camargo, Noah Cardenas, Ricardo Olivar

    Twins fWAR Ranking Last Year: 9th out of 30
    Twins fWAR Projection This Year: 15th out of 30

    THE GOOD
    Jeffers is coming off a breakthrough season that saw him emerge as arguably the league's biggest offensive threat at his position. His .858 OPS led all MLB catchers with 300 or more plate appearances, as he ranked second among Twins hitters in OBP (.369) and first in slugging (.490). Being able to insert a bat like this at the catcher position provides a massive competitive advantage, which is why Rocco Baldelli started Jeffers in every single playoff game last year. (It's also why Joe Mauer just went into the Hall of Fame on the first ballot.)

    The breakout season was a change of pace for Jeffers, following back-to-back disappointing campaigns. For the 26-year-old and the organization that so badly wanted to believe in him, this has been a long time coming. 

    "I worked really hard to have the year I had last year, but I've still got to turn around and do it again. I don't have any doubts that I will be able to," Jeffers told Phil Miller of the Star Tribune. "It didn't feel like a fluke. It felt like I finally laid the groundwork of who I am as a ballplayer. It felt like it was an extremely repeatable type of season."

    The prolific power-hitting performance was rather convincing. Jeffers came through with monster home runs in crucial spots, including an unforgettable eighth-inning go-ahead blast against the Rangers that nearly incited a brawl. He drilled a 10th-inning homer in May that registered as the highest exit velocity by any Twins hitter in the Statcast era. 

    Jeffers stepped up and did amazing things in big spots, which is the sign of a star. He also improved on what had been a glaring deficiency in his defensive game, throwing out a career-high 25% of base stealers--in a season in which the league's success rate on steals skyrocketed.

    Partnering with Jeffers behind the plate once again is Vázquez, who is entering the second season of a three-year, $30-million deal. In stark contrast to Jeffers, Vázquez provided no thump with the bat last year, slashing .223/.280/.318, for a meager 65 OPS+ that ranked as his worst since 2018. However, the veteran backstop graded out extremely well defensively, enabling him to produce 1.0 fWAR in 102 games.

    Even though the price tag might seem rough for a backup catcher, the Twins were wise to hold onto Vázquez for the depth and assurance he provides. Jeffers flashed a big ceiling, but he has a long history of injuries and lapses. Having a seasoned vet like Vázquez available is more than just a luxury.

    THE BAD
    Ever since Mauer moved to first base a decade ago, catcher has been a volatile position for the Twins, who've struggled to sustain much success there. Part of what made the Hall of Famer so special was his stability and consistency, which are brutally hard to maintain as a catcher. In the post-Mauer era, we've seen flashes – an All-Star first half from Kurt Suzuki, an explosive Bomba Squad contribution from Mitch Garver – but both those faded quickly. Is Jeffers destined for the same, following his own glimpse of greatness? 

    He might feel confident his breakout season was "extremely repeatable," but FanGraphs has doubts, projecting Jeffers for 1.8 fWAR this year (down from 2.7) with a 70-point drop-off in wOBA. The 26-year-old has unfortunately earned his status as one of the biggest regression candidates on the team; he slashed just .203/.277/.384 between 2021-22, and last year his strikeout and walk rates remained static while his production was buoyed by a .359 BABIP. Unless he improves his contact rate or discipline, Jeffers will always be susceptible to the kinds of slumps that plagued him in the postseason, wherein he went 2-for-19.

    Even if he doesn't replicate his 134 OPS+ from last year (he won't), Jeffers can still be a valuable primary catcher with his power and defense, so long as he's healthy. It will be interesting to see how his fielding metrics grade out, as last year they were quite poor despite his improvements in controlling the run game. The sudden drop-off in framing effectiveness was especially striking. (Pun intended.) This a fine example of why I feel there's a disconnect between catching metrics and reality, because I doubt you'd find anyone with the Twins (or their opponents) who would consider Jeffers anything less than a very good defensive catcher.

    jeffersstatcastdefense.png

    THE BOTTOM LINE
    Given all the extremes involved, I'd expect some regression to the mean across the board: Jeffers will likely be a little worse offensively, a little better defensively. Vázquez will probably experience the reverse. As long as both stay relatively healthy, it's hard to see the catcher position being any kind of real liability for the Twins. 

    Their true upside here really depends on Jeffers. If he can find a way to sustain or even improve upon what he did in 2023, the Twins will boast one of the best catching units in baseball. On the flip, if Jeffers misses extended time – as he did in both of the previous two seasons – that upside pretty much evaporates with the step down to Vázquez, and then you're one injury away from reaching into some very untested depth. Their ideal scenario still involves using each player often.

    As Mauer prepares for enshrinement in the Hall of Fame, the Twins are hoping Jeffers is ready to solidify his standing (er, squatting?) as the franchise's best two-way catcher since. If he falls short, Minnesota's outlook at this position isn't so hot, with Vázquez turning 34 this year and no clear impact prospects on the way.


    Where would you rank the Twins' catcher situation within the AL Central? What about in the league as a whole? What developments do you expect behind the plate this year?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    34 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Agreed there are a lot of factors that go into Catcher ERA to put too much stock into the stat and I am sure that there are advanced metrics used internally that would be much more reliable measures. 

    However... there is always one thing that I can't dismiss with cERA.

    Since defense is all about run prevention.

    Since the catcher plays such a big role in team defense, pitch sequence, advanced scouting, pitcher psychiatrist, quarterbacking the infield cuts, framing, blocking, steals and all of those things.

    Since often times managers will choose to sacrifice offense at the position for defense because of the hard to measure value of those things.   

    Since run production can be sacrificed and justified for run prevention at the catcher position. 

    At the very very least... Jeffers 3.61 cERA and Vazquez 4.09 cERA can at least show that the run prevention wheels didn't fall of the tracks with Jeffers behind the dish. 

    Analysis beyond that... I'll leave for those who do this for a living. Jeffers did just fine behind the dish in my opinion. 

    The big reason I don't particularly care for cERA is that catchers don't really get to choose who is pitching. Sometimes a great pitcher will choose to have one specific catcher for all his games and they should get some credit for that, but that doesn't happen too often.

    Twins pitchers & # of games caught by each catcher:

    Lopez - Jeffers caught 14 games with a 2.89 ERA to Vazquez's 18 games of 4.25 ERA (.281 BABIP for Jeffers to .342 for Vazquez)

    Gray - Jeffers caught 16 games with a 2.92 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 2.65 ERA

    Ryan - Jeffers caught 13 games with a 3.20 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 5.75 ERA (Vazquez caught 6 of the 7 games when Joe was hiding his groin injury, 9 of Jeffers' games were caught before that injury)

    Ober - Jeffers caught 12 games with a 3.36 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 3.49 ERA

    Maeda - Jeffers caught 7 games with a 3.86 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 4.41 ERA

    Varland - Jeffers caught 8 games with a 2.96 ERA to Vazquez's 8 games of 5.75 ERA *Note that Jeffers only caught Louie 3 times when he was a starter (3.57 ERA in those starts) and Vazquez only caught Louie once when he was a reliever (0 ER)

    Keuchel - Jeffers caught games 5 with a 6.64 ERA to Vazquez's 5 games of 5.19 ERA

    Mahle - Jeffers caught 2 games with a 3.65 ERA to Vazquez's 3 games of 2.70 ERA

    4 minutes ago, CCHOF5yearstoolate said:

    The big reason I don't particularly care for cERA is that catchers don't really get to choose who is pitching. Sometimes a great pitcher will choose to have one specific catcher for all his games and they should get some credit for that, but that doesn't happen too often.

    Twins pitchers & # of games caught by each catcher:

    Lopez - Jeffers caught 14 games with a 2.89 ERA to Vazquez's 18 games of 4.25 ERA (.281 BABIP for Jeffers to .342 for Vazquez)

    Gray - Jeffers caught 16 games with a 2.92 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 2.65 ERA

    Ryan - Jeffers caught 13 games with a 3.20 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 5.75 ERA (Vazquez caught 6 of 7 games when Joe was hiding his groin injury, 9 of Jeffers' games were caught before that injury)

    Ober - Jeffers caught 12 games with a 3.36 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 3.49 ERA

    Maeda - Jeffers caught 7 games with a 3.86 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 4.41 ERA

    Varland - Jeffers caught 8 games with a 2.96 ERA to Vazquez's 8 games of 5.75 ERA *Note that Jeffers only caught Louie 3 times when he was a starter (3.57 ERA in those starts) and Vazquez only caught Louie once when he was a reliever (0 ER)

    Keuchel - Jeffers caught games with a 2.92 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 2.65 ERA

    Great post. Substance, alternate view points beyond the owners are cheap and manager is the worst ever. You'll be one of those posters that I take seriously on this site. 

    I agree... Catchers don't get to choose who is on the mound. Not to mention that cERA and just plain ole ERA is going to be influenced by big bad innings of a 7 spot with one out retired which is going to be influenced by the lucky bounce. 

    However, in the end... as the sample increases by using all pitchers over the course of a season... stabilization increases and with that stabilization, you may not find the absolute truth but at least a nugget of truth. 

    I don't put a lot of stock in cERA either for all the reasons that you correctly list but... I will let the nugget of truth confirm for me what I already believe: 

    Jeffers was not a defensive issue behind the plate. I think it is OK to let his superior offense shine without defense worry diminishing it.    

     

      

    6 hours ago, IaBeanCounter said:

    I believe that combined Jeffers and Vazquez will be about the same as last year (or better).  I agree with all of your other points, especially the comment  “we lost Sonny Gray & all is lost”.  The Twins record when Sonny pitched was 14-18, 6 times Sonny left with the lead but there was a blown save (Twins came back to win 2 of the 6).  The run support for Sonny was awful 3.7 runs per game.  In four of his games the Twins scored 35 runs, in the other 28 they scored 84 (3 runs per game with 18 games being 3 runs or less).  In my opinion the Twins will have a better BP and will score more runs than last year.

    As a point of reference San Francisco was 9-9 in DeSclafana's 18 starts last year with only one BS and 4.6 runs support per game,  It is very possible DS or whoever is the 5th starter could match the 14-18 record.  The postseason is another story, we could trade for an arm at the deadline, but our record in these trades is awful.   JMHO GLTA

     

    Gray obviously deserved better run support!!

    The outcomes are what we are trying to replace…….Gray maybe 15–19 including playoffs? Anyway, I think Varland/DeScla/Festa/SWR can pitch 220 innings and have a .500 record with a few more runs and a better Pen. The ERA may not match up but the wins should be reasonable.

    Come playoffs……Ryan & Lopez can give a team a chance into the 5th inning in their starts. Ober could go 7 or could go 3 depending upon his command. I really like Paddack/Varland/Canterino as parts of the Playoff Pen. We’ll see who performs in the Pen through the year & who’s hot in September……………I think the current staff can get it done.

    My hope for the 2024 season is that carmago demonstrate cities ready for the number two position. With earlier posts about the twins payroll and not wanting to go up and the future. Vasquez and Kepler are the two primary contracts that I can see being eliminated to keep the remainder of the team and the payroll rank. But there's only works if we have another acceptable catcher for the second position

    If Vasquez can give us an 85-ish OPS+ (his career average), it sure would give us some breathing room regarding any Jeffers regression.

    To me, seemed like there was some real improvement with Jeffers beyond the high BABiP. Hope that proves to be the case.

    8 hours ago, CCHOF5yearstoolate said:

    The big reason I don't particularly care for cERA is that catchers don't really get to choose who is pitching. Sometimes a great pitcher will choose to have one specific catcher for all his games and they should get some credit for that, but that doesn't happen too often.

    Twins pitchers & # of games caught by each catcher:

    Lopez - Jeffers caught 14 games with a 2.89 ERA to Vazquez's 18 games of 4.25 ERA (.281 BABIP for Jeffers to .342 for Vazquez)

    Gray - Jeffers caught 16 games with a 2.92 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 2.65 ERA

    Ryan - Jeffers caught 13 games with a 3.20 ERA to Vazquez's 16 games of 5.75 ERA (Vazquez caught 6 of the 7 games when Joe was hiding his groin injury, 9 of Jeffers' games were caught before that injury)

    Ober - Jeffers caught 12 games with a 3.36 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 3.49 ERA

    Maeda - Jeffers caught 7 games with a 3.86 ERA to Vazquez's 14 games of 4.41 ERA

    Varland - Jeffers caught 8 games with a 2.96 ERA to Vazquez's 8 games of 5.75 ERA *Note that Jeffers only caught Louie 3 times when he was a starter (3.57 ERA in those starts) and Vazquez only caught Louie once when he was a reliever (0 ER)

    Keuchel - Jeffers caught games 5 with a 6.64 ERA to Vazquez's 5 games of 5.19 ERA

    Mahle - Jeffers caught 2 games with a 3.65 ERA to Vazquez's 3 games of 2.70 ERA

    Mahle - Gray - Ober are all essentially a wash……seems to denote that they didn’t affect the ERA as catchers.

    Lopez struggled early in year more often - no accounting here for opponents (good/bad) - again, I think they both call a good game and the spikes here attributed to one or the other catcher is probably due to pitcher’s performance.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...