Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    How Can the Twins Communicate More Effectively About Player Injuries?


    Jamie Cameron

    Injuries derailed the 2022 Twins. While they are unavoidable, setbacks normal, and timelines unpredictable, the Twins could be much more effective in how they communicate about player injuries. In this article, we'll dive into organizational communication tendencies and how the Twins could improve them in 2023.

    Image courtesy of Orlando Ramirez, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    I want to talk about injuries. They derailed a solid-if-not-spectacular Twins squad in 2022. Minnesota was reduced to trotting out a quad-A lineup for the last month of the year as the season sputtered to an anticlimactic close. I’d argue, though, that the reaction of Twins fans to injury news was disproportional even for a fanbase that can careen toward toxicity at the best of times. There are factors that underpin that, some the Twins organization can control, some they can’t. In this piece, I’ll try and highlight those tensions, and propose reasonable, easily implementable solutions the organization could implement in 2023.

    Before digging into a topic that can be contentious, I want to be clear about some things I’m not advocating for. I don’t think the Twins owe fans anything regarding player timelines as they recover from injury. I also want to acknowledge that players suffer setbacks. That’s normal, and it’s never going to change. Despite some of the worst injury luck going last year, I have a contention: the Twins organization does not yet have consistent and proactive systems and structures in place to communicate about player injuries. Let’s lay out the challenges, and propose some solutions.

    Problem: No One Owns Communication Regarding Players Injuries
    To my limited knowledge, the Twins don’t have an owner of injury communication. There’s no one person with whom injury updates sit. Rocco Baldelli often gives injury updates in pre and postgame press conferences. It’s natural for reporters to ask injury-related questions after the game (it’s news/proximity to the event). I’m not suggesting Baldelli never communicates about injuries, more pointing out that it’s clearly an area of his media responsibilities he found uncomfortable or frustrating. Derek Falvey also communicates updates about injuries and player status when he has media availability. If there isn’t a responsible party of the majority of injury updates, communication can become muddled, unclear, or even contradictory.

    Solution: Release a Weekly Injury Bulletin
    The Twins social media has taken a huge step forward early in 2023. Behind the scenes access such as ‘The Diamond’, redesigned social media visuals, and an excellent communications team make the Twins set up to take the majority of the communication out of Rocco Baldelli’s hands. The Twins should release a ‘injury bulletin’ on a regular cadence to provide updates to media and fans who want access. Predictable communication structures promote consistency and trust.

    Problem: Too Often, Communication is Reactive, Instead of Proactive
    The second challenge I’ve noticed with the Twins injury-related communication is a reactive approach, instead of a proactive one. Last year, Trevor Larnach suffered from a core muscle injury. The timeline communicated by the Twins and the actual timeline of his return were vastly discrepant. I’d argue that although the setbacks and the longer recovery time are frustrating to fans, the bigger frustration is expecting one outcome or timeline, and experiencing another, an experience that could be improved with more consistent communication.

    Solution: Over Communicate Updates via Social Media
    For players with mid-to-long-term injuries, the Twins should communicate updates on their status at least weekly, using social media. The great thing about this solution, is there’s already an exemplar out there, the Golden State Warriors. Here’s an example of how they communicated updates leveraging twitter, during Steph Curry’s recent recovery from injury.

    The upside is clear here. Overcommunicating updates instill confidence that progress is being made and player needs are being attended to.

    Problem: Communication Around Injuries is Often Unclear
    The final prevalent issue with the Twins approach to communicating around player injuries is a symptom of the first two challenges. Because there is no clear owner of communication and updates tended to get ‘backed up’ until a presser in which Baldelli or Falvey would have to reel off a list of players and their current status, updates felt lacking in detail, specificity, and clarity. Of course, it’s the Twins prerogative how much information they reveal to the public about injuries. Obviously, they want to and should respect the players’ privacy. I’d argue, however, that there’s no competitive advantage to vague communication. 

    Solution: Follow a Simple Formula When Communicating Injury-Related News
    I’m not a doctor, healthcare professional, or anything in the field, but a simple formula for communicating injury updates would increase clarity tremendously. Diagnosis + current treatment + next step. The diagnosis re-grounds folks in the player’s injury, the current treatment plan reminds fans that the organization is working on solutions (because we know they are), the next step previews for fans when they can expect further updates or information.

    Perhaps all of these offerings aren't aligned with what the Twins organization is willing to communicate, that’s their choice. I’d argue, however, that there are some quick and easy wins to be had in how the Twins communicate around player health. These solutions would increase trust and perception from fans of something we should all believe to be true; that the organization is doing everything they can to keep players on the field and maintain a winning team.

    What are your thoughts on these potential solutions? Are they feasible? Would there be any concerns with these options from the Twins perspective? Would these solutions be enough to stop fans from questioning things so often? Leave your COMMENTS below. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    20 minutes ago, Nine of twelve said:

    If you think a prospective ticket buyer is entitled to know someone's personal medical information then you and I disagree.

    Baseball is for fans, fans should know who is playing and who isn't.   I'm not asking for his chart.  

    Good solutions Jamie. IMO the lack of information from the FO is that they want to avoid confrontation from fans for their mismanagement of player's health & the consequences from those decisions. Polanco's health problem is the effect of the abuse that was done last season & FO wants to minimize it. 

    I looks like the team is on the right track now & the injuries will be less severe & fewer. After Polanco becomes 100% hopefully  the FO will become more transparent.

    44 minutes ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    Baseball is for fans, fans should know who is playing and who isn't.   I'm not asking for his chart.  

    Every player not on the active roster isn't playing What more do you want to know? That's the question....no one is complaining about guys listed as out.....

    1 minute ago, Doctor Gast said:

    Good solutions Jamie. IMO the lack of information from the FO is that they want to avoid confrontation from fans for their mismanagement of player's health & the consequences from those decisions. Polanco's health problem is the effect of the abuse that was done last season & FO wants to minimize it. 

    I looks like the team is on the right track now & the injuries will be less severe & fewer. After Polanco becomes 100% hopefully  the FO will become more transparent.

    You know this how? I'd guess they aren't talking about Polanco more because it is hard to predict with any accuracy.

    6 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    The only people who need clear updates on sports injuries are the players, management and people gambling on the games. There are no issues with the first two interested parties and I don't know why the team should care about the third party.

    Able to read, hence fan of sports for over 50 years, and certainly curious about injuries. Not really at all concerned with the communication about injuries from the front office. To each his own but am tired about “the lack of transparency” comments from the FO. If a guy’s hurt and he’s going to need some time to heal, within a range, to get better - enough said……it’s not an exact science. 

    Maybe we are as fans surprised by some extended time to heal but how does that have any affect on anything?

    Carl Anthony Towns was out from November to late March……..he had a January set-back. He was “close” to being ready many times……no real good reports from Wolves other than, he isn’t ready!

    I gotta think Fantasy owners want to know who & how long to sit guys & gamblers are wondering about their picks to get to the playoffs - win totals - etc.

    IMO, try to be accurate as a FO with injury news while protecting any sensitive/competitive issues. Update guy’s injuries every couple weeks - maybe the 1st & 15th of month so management & fans are clear about the information timing. Sound reasonable?

    13 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    You know this how? I'd guess they aren't talking about Polanco more because it is hard to predict with any accuracy.

    I observe things, I observed that after Polanco injured himself, there was no big deal. IDK if they even acknowledged the injury, they just kept on playing him. I observed he was playing hurt and seriously wondering why they weren't placing him on IL right away & treat whatever was wrong. And after they placed him the IL, they rushed to get him off it.

    I was very concerned that Polanco was kept from ST from an injury that FO was not concerned about because Polanco is a type of player that bounces back very quickly, so I expected him to be 100% coming. This could have been just a simple injury with minimal down time if treated properly. But because of their gross mismanagement, his down time has greatly been multiplied.

    These are only my assumptions of what I observe, 

    1st they said it was tendonitis but now they say it's a bone bruise, don't you think they knew this from the beginning? How do you think the fanbase would respond if they came out being honest & said before ST that Polanco was going to be out until 2 wks. after season opener from such a minimal injury? It'd be easier if they hope Polanco would pull off another quick recovery & avoid any questions about how they handle him last year. & if he doesn't they can string us along until  he's back and by that time we are so happy to have him back that we forget how we got to this point.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm 100% how they are bringing him along now. If they'd resort to their old ways & rushed Polanco thru, they'd make things much worse & jeopardize his career. 

    8 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    I observe things, I observed that after Polanco injured himself, there was no big deal. IDK if they even acknowledged the injury, they just kept on playing him. I observed he was playing hurt and seriously wondering why they weren't placing him on IL right away & treat whatever was wrong. And after they placed him the IL, they rushed to get him off it.

    I was very concerned that Polanco was kept from ST from an injury that FO was not concerned about because Polanco is a type of player that bounces back very quickly, so I expected him to be 100% coming. This could have been just a simple injury with minimal down time if treated properly. But because of their gross mismanagement, his down time has greatly been multiplied.

    These are only my assumptions of what I observe, 

    1st they said it was tendonitis but now they say it's a bone bruise, don't you think they knew this from the beginning? How do you think the fanbase would respond if they came out being honest & said before ST that Polanco was going to be out until 2 wks. after season opener from such a minimal injury? It'd be easier if they hope Polanco would pull off another quick recovery & avoid any questions about how they handle him last year. & if he doesn't they can string us along until  he's back and by that time we are so happy to have him back that we forget how we got to this point.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm 100% how they are bringing him along now. If they'd resort to their old ways & rushed Polanco thru, they'd make things much worse & jeopardize his career. 

    I don't think more than a hundred or so fans care if they'd change their talking about Polanco, frankly.

    2 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    Thanks!  I never knew "a business should be upfront with its customers about its product" would be so controversial!

    I think there’s a lot of gray area here. Are you buying tickets the day off? How far in advance? And sometimes things are just as they, day to day and they really can’t be more certain. Many seem to want black and white answers when it’s all gray

    2 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

    I gotta think Fantasy owners want to know who & how long to sit guys & gamblers are wondering about their picks to get to the playoffs - win totals - etc.

    So gamblers and gamblers care about transparency when it comes to injuries. Everyone else can figure out that a player on the injured list isn't playing tonight.

    I may be wrong, but I feel any angst regarding injuries to Twins players is more about just caring about the player, the team, and any ACCURATE information as possible regarding such. And I'm in that boat. As a fan, I just want to know if player X is going to be back relatively soon, or had a set back, or is now done for the year. 

    So is this about a lack of transparency...which we aren't really entitled to for various reasons...or just a frustration as fans based on multiple injuries...mostly in 2022...in which initial prognosis were very incorrect?

    I hate Twitter. I don't do Twitter. But I read TD, look at articles on MLB, and MLBTRADERUMORS, and read articles by Do on the Twins website, and listen to Gleeman and the Geek both free and Patreon, and I have yet to see any lack of information or transparency, overall. 

    I sure wish the Twins had just told us last year that all of the projected players expected back after X number of weeks suffered setbacks and such, and we might not see them again. THAT, IMO, was something fans were allowed to know. But was that poor communication, poor public relations, or poor management by the training staff is hard to know.

    Just a few posts above is a listed timeline of Polanco injury updates. The Twins were forthright. Without going in to great detail, they offered updates they believed true at the time, and then announced setbacks. How are they not being transparent? Do we need confirmation reports from doctors or the training staff? Or are we just discouraged and want to blame someone for Polanco not being ready?

    This is akin to so much angst that Buxton will DH a lot in the early going. The guy has been working in the cages, running, shagging balls, and played in milb games. But they've stated they want to DH him a lot to begin the season. Nobody said this was a permanent move. Did they really have to announce they wanted to run him less in early cold weather to make sure his knee felt good? He sure looked fine legging out a triple opening day despite a silly slide in to 3rd base.

    Have the Twins been nothing but open about Alex Kirilloff and his surgery and rehab? Soreness, and no pain. A slow ramp up to get confident. Everyone confident this latest procedure will work, including comments from AK himself. Where is there a lack of transparency?

    The NFL has a mandated injury report due to gambling. And so, teams are deliberately vague about injuries to stump their competition that week.

    The NBA allows games off for "stress management" which stinks. If I spent a few $hundred to watch James or Davis in a Laker game I might feel cheated.

    But my very first game at Target Field was last August with my father, my uncle, and some additional family members. I already knew who wasn't going to be in the lineup. But we were there for the experience. 

    If we lived closer and attended more games, I might be disappointed to find out Buxton's knee had him on a day off. Or Miranda woke up with a stiff back and didn't start. But that wouldn't mean it wasn't a good game, or the Twins might not win. So should MLB teams post who MIGHT be out the next day due to rest or a last minute "tweak"? 

    "Sorry gang, but if you're planning on attending the Twins game tomorrow, it's been reported that Larnach has a stiff ankle and Alcala has a blister. So you might not want to attend if you were looking forward to seeing these two". And I'm over exaggerating, of course!

    But other than poor communication with fans about extended injuries that we as fans want to know that extended, I just don't see an issue here. 

    IMPROVEMENT? Just give us updates every couple of weeks. Fans want to know. Player X is now at Ft Myers healthy and working back. We hope he's ready to start his rehab. Probably a few games here and there with the thought of level X In a few weeks. That's all. Just some updates for the fans. Other than that, I just don't see an issue here at all.

    12 hours ago, Nine of twelve said:

    This is a good point. So simply check the 26-man roster on the Twins web site and you'll have all the information you need.

    Maybe, unless the Twins decide to sit healthy players for some reason.  I took my son to a game last summer (we can only afford one game per year unfortunatley, long story).  His favorite player by a mile is Buxton and his favorite thing is when Buxton does the truck honk thing after a homer.  He even has a Twins trucker hat.  Long story short the game we went to happened to be one where they sat an apparetnly healthy Buxton.  (And Correa, coincidentally)  My son was in tears, or at least he was until a little ice cream help him get over it :)  Ended up being fine, but it was really unfortunate.  Obviously would have gone to a different game if we'd known he wasn't playing.  I think a lot of folks here are forgetting that baseball is a game, and sports are entertainment.  Sure, I guess there's no law that says they have to be upfront with all these things.  I also think it's pretty short sighted of the club to do some of these things.  I have 91 and 87 memories to sustain my fandom; my boy has literally never seen them win a playoff game.  He's a Buxton fan first, not a Twins fan first.  And I think the Twins underestimate the fan apathy here especially among young people.  

    On 3/31/2023 at 8:57 AM, Johnny Ringo said:

    I listen to a lot of baseball radio and television broadcasts and Gladden is hands-down the worst announcer in the game. Honestly, it's not even close. He possesses the Four Horsemen of incompetency: bad grammar, bad timing, lack of knowledge of the modern game and finally, the inability to be at all truthful about what's unfolding in front of him. Vin Scully spinning viciously in his grave may represent a further threat to the San Andreas fault. 

    Why do they keep him around? He has name recognition and he sticks religiously to the party line.  

    I’m not on board with all your criticisms of the front office, but I have agree with your comment about Gladden. I listen to the Twins on the radio when I’m driving, so the timing can be random. If it’s Danny’s turn to describe the action I often, quite often, have no idea of what inning it is, what the score might be, even which team is at bat.

    Gladden will say “he hit that hard!” Who? Where? With what result?

    Corey constantly updates information, which I appreciate. I imagine his level of detail might be overly repetitive if you’ve been listening to the game from the start, but it’s a great approach if the listener has to come and go.

    another pet peeve of mine is why in God’s name Tim Laudner keeps getting trotted out as a TV commentator by Bally before and after games. He very rarely adds any real content to whatever his broadcast partner has just said. He calls every Twins player “that young man,” even those in their thirties.

    I guess you’re right about name recognition- Gladden and Laudner part of the World Series teams a generation ago.

    13 minutes ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    Obviously would have gone to a different game if we'd known he wasn't playing. 

    I'm not sure what your expectations are. In addition to checking the active roster, there are numerous web sites that post starting lineups several hours before game time. If you have to choose a game in advance do you expect the team to notify you who will be playing in which games days or weeks before the fact?

    On 3/31/2023 at 8:21 AM, terrydactyls said:

    All of this sounds very reasonable, but I do have one problem.  I hate social media and I am not on Faceplant, Instapot, or Tic Tac Toe.  How about communication through internet platforms such as Twins Daily, the Athletic, and other readily available sources?

    Or maybe Do on MLB.com?

    oh wait….

    DC1FC412-0B1E-4DEF-BB5F-C8C38AC6608D.png.761fd540905bead2fb7beacd75f9dd8a.png

    2 hours ago, Nine of twelve said:

    I'm not sure what your expectations are. In addition to checking the active roster, there are numerous web sites that post starting lineups several hours before game time. If you have to choose a game in advance do you expect the team to notify you who will be playing in which games days or weeks before the fact?

    I’ll happily send a text out when I know I’ll be playing.

    3 hours ago, Melissa said:

    I’m not on board with all your criticisms of the front office, but I have agree with your comment about Gladden. I listen to the Twins on the radio when I’m driving, so the timing can be random. If it’s Danny’s turn to describe the action I often, quite often, have no idea of what inning it is, what the score might be, even which team is at bat.

    Gladden will say “he hit that hard!” Who? Where? With what result?

    Corey constantly updates information, which I appreciate. I imagine his level of detail might be overly repetitive if you’ve been listening to the game from the start, but it’s a great approach if the listener has to come and go.

    another pet peeve of mine is why in God’s name Tim Laudner keeps getting trotted out as a TV commentator by Bally before and after games. He very rarely adds any real content to whatever his broadcast partner has just said. He calls every Twins player “that young man,” even those in their thirties.

    I guess you’re right about name recognition- Gladden and Laudner part of the World Series teams a generation ago.

    To some of us, a guy in his thirties is a young man. 😝

    This is a really well-crafted response but I don’t think I was hypercritical of the FO. I did call Falvey “competent”. I don’t think his track record earns him higher accolades than that. My post was more of  a comment on the broadcast teams. Amongst copious other flaws, they never even mildly investigate or report injury realities. I realize they aren’t paid to criticize the FO but their “ The Twins got edged 8-0 tonight but Nick Gordon had a double” stuff has gone way too far. 

    On 4/1/2023 at 4:24 PM, Johnny Ringo said:

    To some of us, a guy in his thirties is a young man. 😝

    This is a really well-crafted response but I don’t think I was hypercritical of the FO. I did call Falvey “competent”. I don’t think his track record earns him higher accolades than that. My post was more of  a comment on the broadcast teams. Amongst copious other flaws, they never even mildly investigate or report injury realities. I realize they aren’t paid to criticize the FO but their “ The Twins got edged 8-0 tonight but Nick Gordon had a double” stuff has gone way too far. 

     

    On 4/1/2023 at 12:10 PM, Melissa said:

    I’m not on board with all your criticisms of the front office, but I have agree with your comment about Gladden. I listen to the Twins on the radio when I’m driving, so the timing can be random. If it’s Danny’s turn to describe the action I often, quite often, have no idea of what inning it is, what the score might be, even which team is at bat.

    Gladden will say “he hit that hard!” Who? Where? With what result?

    Corey constantly updates information, which I appreciate. I imagine his level of detail might be overly repetitive if you’ve been listening to the game from the start, but it’s a great approach if the listener has to come and go.

    another pet peeve of mine is why in God’s name Tim Laudner keeps getting trotted out as a TV commentator by Bally before and after games. He very rarely adds any real content to whatever his broadcast partner has just said. He calls every Twins player “that young man,” even those in their thirties.

    I guess you’re right about name recognition- Gladden and Laudner part of the World Series teams a generation ago.

    You know I really never picked up on Laud's "young man" references but since you mentioned this, I have paid attention and he does say it about 1,000 a broadcast. You should have it as a drinking game at a party. Make sure everyone has an Uber ride.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...