Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Would the Twins Make a Shakeup at Hitting Coach?


    Nick Nelson

    The Twins offense has been mostly miserable this year, and it's not showing signs of improvement as key young hitters get shipped out to work on their game in the minors.

    Not a great sign for the relatively inexperienced and unaccomplished individual currently serving in the hitting coach role. Is David Popkins on the hot seat?

    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Normally, I would say it is way too soon to viably have this conversation, knowing the tendencies of this Twins front office and baseball operation. They tend to not make rash, reactive decisions. Firing the hitting coach, who was handpicked by this same regime only 18 months ago? That would certainly qualify.

    However, there are a few different factors in play here that, from my view, at least raise this possibility as a somewhat realistic one. For example:

    David Popkins doesn't have a much of a track record to fall back on.

    Much like they did with Wes Johnson when they plucked him out of college (or Pete Maki when they elevated from from an analyst role, for that matter), the Twins based their evaluation of Popkins more on projection and potential than concrete proven experience. 

    When the Twins hired him after the 2021 season to replace Edgar Varela, Popkins had been the hitting coach for Los Angeles' Single-A team. That was his highest level of coaching experience. Popkins is only 33 years old and frankly there seems to be a reasonable chance he's in over his head, based on the evidence.

    The offense did not perform particularly well last year, in his first season on the job, but that was pretty easy to excuse amid the onslaught of injuries. There were some decent signs for Popkins, such as the improvements certain hitters made during the season, and the (related) positive reviews he was getting from players.

    This year, it's a very different story so far.

    There aren't many excuses for the ongoing struggles of the offense.

    No one could reasonably fault Popkins for failing to elevate an absolutely ravaged lineup in the second half of last season. The greatest hitting coach in baseball history isn't going to weaponize an outfield comprising Mark Contreras, Gilberto Celestino and Jake Cave.

    This year, however, the Twins have been quite healthy – at least in terms of keeping players on the field. When you've got a batting order filled with established quality hitters who are all getting lost in these ongoing funks, failing to find answers or step to the plate with confident plans, it doesn't reflect well on the guy charged with guiding them through it. 

    This is especially striking in a few specific cases.

    Young talented hitters are getting completely overwhelmed.

    To be clear, I'm writing this article from the standpoint that Popkins could be on the hot seat, not that I necessarily think he should be. But this is probably the biggest factor that would compel me to consider it a valid course of action. 

    Seeing Trevor Larnach, Jose Miranda, and Nick Gordon all just completely fall flat on their faces has been really tough to watch. Developing these kinds of emergent MLB-ready bats – helping them navigate challenges and combat adjustments that come along with the sport's harshest transition – strikes me as one of the most vital responsibilities of a hitting coach. Based on results, it's hard to see how Popkins could be faring worse in this regard. 

    In many of these cases, there are seemingly clear flaws holding these hitters back, be it Larnach's susceptibility to offspeed pitching or Miranda's hitchy swing that beckons opponents to blow him away with high fastballs. 

     

    I'm not saying these are easy things to fix, but ... they're not getting fixed. At all. None of the issues plaguing hitters throughout the lineup seem to be getting addressed in a meaningful way. And while it's still early in the season, it's not THAT early. We're coming up on the quarter-mark, and ...

    This team has high expectations and heavy pressure to perform.

    I perceived the past offseason as an emphatic statement from Twins ownership and executives: We're going to pump money into this franchise – ambitious rebranding, ballpark enhancements, Correa – now we better see some results that make a clear impact on the fanbase and revenue.

    So far the crowds have been fairly sparse at Target Field, owing partially to cool spring weather but also to a product that is failing to energize and erase lingering skepticism from last year. The Twins are leading a hideously bad AL Central and hanging above .500, sure, but the bar is higher than that. It needs to be. And right now this underperforming offense is the clear and undeniable culprit in keeping them short of it, as the pitching staff continues to go above and beyond.

    Now that Miranda's been sent out, there aren't really any remaining roster changes to be made at the moment. The Twins' lineup kind of is what it is for the time being. The question is whether they'll stick with the status quo or seek to shake things up and bring in a new voice. 

    That would beg the question of "who," which of course is really the burning question here. Finding a new coach at this point of the season is not easy, though I suspect they have some candidates they like internally. 

    Moving on from Popkins would not necessarily be an admission that the Twins were wrong to believe in him, but perhaps that they were a little early on him. There is risk attached to the upside of targeting up-and-comers and pushing them right into the big chair (e.g. Wes Johnson). Popkins is one of the youngest hitting coaches in baseball.

    He hasn't had a whole lot of time to establish himself and find his footing. In some ways it feels very unfair that this discussion is even taking place. But it feels like a pivotal time in the Twins' high-stakes season: ascend to the top tier or trudge toward mediocrity. Much is on the line and things are trending badly. Right now Popkins is a simple, semi-credible scapegoat, which puts him at risk.

    Such is life with the most volatile job in baseball.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    To me the issue is philosophy, so if they let Popkins go they'd just hire someone else to carry out the "grip it and rip it" philosophy.  So I doubt a change would matter.  One of the reasons organizations may hire young inexperienced folks is they're hungry and don't have the built in equity to butt heads with bosses - vs hiring someone who's done it before and is more likely to challenge philosophies and decisions.  Similar to the "if they fire Rocco they'll just hire Rocco 2.0", I'd not bother with a hitting coach change.  

    Not that I necessarily think they should as it seems like players are high on him, but what about whoever the hitting coach is in AAA? Seems like a lot of players sent down start producing again rather quickly. While a lot of that is easier pitching staffs I have to imagine they have the same scouting reports the MLB teams had and players wouldn't see the uptick they have been as quickly if he didn't give them some piece of advice that was working. Might also help out a lot of the younger guys who are more familiar with him vs Popkins, since he was the person who helped them get into the MLB.

    Unless it's Kirilloff, the Twins won't have a .280 let alone a .300 hitter by season's end, but that's not my biggest complaint. It's the seven games that have been lost or frittered away because of mental mistakes and/or errors. Even in today's 4-3 win over the Padres, Correa made a mental error by watching his fly ball (thinking it was gone) in lieu of hustling out of the box, so he ended up with a double instead of a triple, so he gets thrown out at home on the base hit and Gallo makes a bad throw, which put the Twins in a tough spot. Poor focus is one element that can be addressed. Some of these players could do with a bit of Tom Kelly love, which means you sit at the start of the next game.

    If the Twins batters keep swinging at pitches well out of the strike zone they will get fewer good pitches to hit.  I am sure every team now knows that the Twins hitters are swinging at pitches well out of strike zone so they will have their pitchers throw fewer strikes.  I think we have already seen that happen in the past few games where below average pitchers have not allowed many hits since the Twins batters were swinging at pitches they could not hit.  The Twins are in for  a long low scoring season if their hitters do not stop swinging at pitches out of the strike zone. Something has to change or the Twins will not be a winning team.  Even good starting pitchers need 3 or 4 runs to win their games.

    I just do not think the Twins will make any changes and we will end up with a losing season just like last year. 

    I believe a few players (or more) are pressing and trying too hard. Gallo's throw was a little rushed for no good reason, but he has played a good left field. Correa has been great at shortstop but he over estimated the runner and hurried his multiple bounce throw which took a bad last hop or Kirilloff catches it for the out. Correa was barely out at the plate on the hardest throw from the outfiled this season in MLB. Tatis charged the ball and made a fantastic throw. Oh, Correa would likely have been thrown out at third base if he had hustled out of the box. Still the players should run out every play. We saw Polanco nabbed at second base when he thought he had hit a home run. Polanco really hustled on his last double. 

    The pitching has been excellent overall and the bats will come around again. Imagine the concerns that San Diego fans have about Soto and then see how he has found something the last couple of days. It is a long season. 

    9 hours ago, wombat28 said:

    When Rowson left for Miami is when the Twins hitting started going south. Rowson had Miguel Sano making contact, hitting to the opposite field, hitting for average. Now he's out of MLB.

    I think Rowson is an awesome example of how coaches don't really matter that much. They matter, but not nearly as much as people suggest. The idea being that Rowson was the key to the Twins hitting success in the late 20teens. He then went to Miami, and they were the worst offense in baseball before they let him go this offseason. Now he's with Detroit, who's scored the 3rd fewest runs in baseball. Right above the Marlins. MLB coaches are mostly just scapegoats for MLB front offices, but the truth is the talent of the players is all that really matters. If you build a terrible lineup like Miami had while Rowson was there they won't score. If you build a really good lineup like the Twins had while he was here they're going to score.

    5 hours ago, jdgoin said:

    I don't know David Popkins. I do know hitting coaches are usually the easiest to blame for a crappy lineup. This is offensive baseball in the 2020's. Elevated pull-side approach.

    The Twins are at the top of the majors in pull-percentage, though. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2023-advanced-batting.shtml

    41 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    The Twins are at the top of the majors in pull-percentage, though. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2023-advanced-batting.shtml

    That’s exactly their approach, and the game in general. Which is why I feel offense sucks. He’s probably not the issue. Most hitting coaches aren’t. It’s the crappy lineups because nobody can hit.

    23 minutes ago, jdgoin said:

    That’s exactly their approach, and the game in general.

    The MLB pull-percentage in 1988, the first year I find those numbers on b-r.com, was 31.7% overall.  This year it's at 29.9%.   That's a downward trend, not up.  I would have guessed the opposite, but it is what it is.

    And our Twins are at 33.4%.  That would be near the highest even if it were still 1988, and definitely is tops (well, Seattle's a close second, and they are another low-BA team) in 2023.

    Last year, if you're worried about small sample size for this young season, was 29.5% for MLB, and 30.2% for the Twins, so they were more in line with the league - closer to the middle than to the top. There's something new going on with our guys, since last year.

    The batting average for the Twins is at an extreme this season, too.  Correlation is not causation, but it's still a place to look.

    Pull-percentage.  Because no one asked.... here's more.  :)

    What's different for our Twins this year?  Well, for one thing we added Joey Gallo, and he's kind of off the charts as a pull hitter.  47.8% this year.  That's just kind of how he rolls, but he's above even his lofty career norm of 40.5%.  Of course due to injury he hasn't accounted for that many PA, so he's a factor but it's not like he's pulling the team percentage that far up all by himself.

    And then there's Buxton.  He's right behind Gallo in pull-percentage at 43.9%.  Last year he was only at 36% and his career percentage is 33.6%.  He's pulling like crazy this year.

    (As an aside, league-wide, among qualifiers for the batting title, Kyle Schwarber leads the way at 48.9% pull.  Kyle is batting a lusty .187 this season.)

    Let's see, who else leads the Twins in pull%?  Polanco's at 40.7%, Kepler's at 39.2% (you KNOW he's going to show up as a leader in pulling the ball), and looky here, Nick Gordon is pulling 34.8% of the time (I think of him as a slap hitter - wrongly).

    Bringing up the rear in pull% is Michael A Taylor at 19.7.  If Nick Gordon surprised me, at least MAT doesn'.t.

    And lest you think I'm saying "go to the opposite field, your batting average is sure to rise," there is Carlos Correa.  He is just above MAT in pull% at 25.5%, pretty close to his career mark, and his batting average sits below .200, which is not his career mark.  Oh well, if there were simple answers, the offense would already be fixed.

    One more thing.  What else is different this year is we traded Luis Arraez.  His pull% last year was 26.4%.  He's similar this year for the Marlins.

    This is all anecdotal, because I'm not a wizard with spreadsheets so I just look up stuff that's interesting.  And I'm not a batting coach either - maybe for instance pitchers have some say over whether their opponents at bat get the kind of pitches you just have to try and pull and this year they're feeding our Twins a lot of that.  See the ball, pull the ball - it's simple and it gets complicated in a hurry.

    Anyway, correlation isn't causation.  Low BA and high pull% just makes me go hmmmm.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...