Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Squirrel

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    34,759

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    167

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Squirrel

  1. Squirrel
    No one has said this.
  2. Squirrel
    Okay, Pablo saying the culture needs to change, which I believe it does, isn’t him saying he wants out. I don’t think chpettit is dismissing anything. But he is calling out some who are trying to intuit the meaning to be everyone wants out. For the record, I stand by what I’ve said above about the culture. This article is asking is the culture problem caused by Correa or Baldelli. I refuse to scapegoat one player, who agreed to be traded only to Houston, no one else, as the problem of the Twins. The problem of the Twins starts with ownership and everyone in between them and the players. That’s where your culture problem begins and ends, imo.
  3. Squirrel
    This is the crux. We need to stop scapegoating Correa and start looking beyond one person. Where is Rocco in all this? Falvey? Pohlads? Personally, my enthusiasm for this team went out the window when Pohlad, after winning in a playoff, cut payroll. I mean, that’s the ultimate pulling the rug out from under. Whatever culture might have been growing with the winning season was stomped out. I don’t blame any player wanting to leave. It’s not that Falvey didn’t get the exact players Correa named, it was about not making serious efforts toward winning. It comes from the top … Pohlad, Falvey, Baldelli.
  4. Squirrel
    I think the team had talent. The most, enough to win it all? No, I’d agree with you there. And I was dubious of their offense at the start of the season. I had them at 80 wins. That’s not WS caliber. But this team still had talent and really underperformed. We aren’t going to come close to what we should have, even if not a WS caliber team. And that seems to be the trend, or cycle. We can talk all we want about trades, good, bad or ugly, but if talent cannot be fully developed, or dies when it hits the majors, more is wrong.
  5. Squirrel
    The problem as I stated is that we have not been successful at devoting talent. We’ve had high rated farms before, during Falvey’s realm even, yet, our talent doesn’t produce. If you are going to operate like a small market team (we are a mid-market team in terms of our demographic, btw), then you damn well better develop that talent. We have failed to do so. Once our players get to the majors, they don’t produce. Either the wrong talent is being selected, there is something majorly amiss in our development tactics, or our on-field management kills it. As I’ve stated previously, the wrong questions are being asked. I said that selling was the right move, but it doesn’t seem to matter. Something else is wrong. It’s not the players. Until there is new ownership, it won’t change.
  6. Squirrel
    Missed my point. There’s no way to know if the trade is good, bad or otherwise. I mean on the surface all we can do is react. I even said I question whether or not we got ‘enough’ but there really isn’t a way to judge our return until our return is in a position to show it. I tire of the ‘look at our prospects’ talk. They don’t win championships. I think there is a greater problem. And rich from someone who the other day was telling people to tune it out if you don’t like it.
  7. Squirrel
    I already said we weren’t going to win so selling was the thing to do. But articles and comments on the trades being good, bad, or whatever, we can’t know that for a while. I do question whether we got enough for the talent we sold, but will have to wait and see. This team had talent. I don’t blame player leadership on this team. This isn’t the first time we have had underperforming teams so it is time to take a deeper look at why and not blame the players. Poor management is a very likely possibility, along with poor development. Without a change in ownership, these issues are not going to be solved. We herald having great prospects, then the prospects don’t work out. This is the cycle. We aren’t a small market team, but ownership treating us as such isn’t going to win squat.
  8. Squirrel
    Yes, I guess there is always a chance until there’s not. But if we did happen to make it to the playoffs, we no longer have a BP of any real substance to carry us through. It would be a completely unexpected and unplanned for event. As for trades and where they are now, it’s incredibly early to know if what was done is good or not. I find these articles and threads about the trades just, well, very shortsighted. No one will know if these trades were good for probably five years. The team this year did not lack for talent. And that so many players garnered interest and we were able to make 10(!) trades off our active roster was a testament to that. The questions everyone should be asking isn’t about if the trades were good or not, but why they were necessary. Yes, yes, we weren’t going to win so it was time to be sellers. Why weren’t we winning? What is happening that this team so dramatically underperformed? The hard look at development and on-field management won’t happen with the FO and ownership staying put. Thats the story. You can paint it anyway you like, but this wasn’t a team that should have failed as it did. If the pieces weren’t meshing right, that’s a hit on the manager and the roster construction. This year has shown that even with talent, we couldn’t win. Trades don’t matter if those we traded for don’t develop and don’t mesh into winners with those currently in charge. I think that’s why there are so many down on the team. Who cares if we have 5 or 6 top prospects. We’ve had highly rated farm systems before, during Falvey’s time. And yet, here we still are.
  9. Squirrel
    Yep, the point I was trying to make …
  10. Squirrel
    It makes a difference as the meanings are different.
  11. Squirrel
    Two month? Didn’t Brock have more on his contract than that?
  12. Squirrel
    Right. But many casual fans thought that. Likely the same fans who are elevating Lee.
  13. Squirrel
    You’ve missed what I’m saying, by a wide margin. So, you advocate for dumpster diving and bargain bin shopping, confident that mish mash will click and bring us a championship. That’s literally what youre saying yet many on these boards have chastised and criticized the Pohlads and FO over the years for being cheap. We all knew when Correa was signed he’d likely be moving to 3rd, thinking we had heir apparents in the wings. But for once we had a legitimate SS, something we haven’t had for years. Someone who could make the plays and be a leader on the field. He still had a couple of great years, even with the injuries, and I bet has more. But the point isn’t that we were hamstrung by Correa, we were hamstrung by Pohlads and the FO. Pohlads reduced salary after we finally had success in the playoffs, success largely due to Correa, btw. And where are the developed SS who could move Correa to third? Nowhere. Lee is nowhere near the SS Correa is, not even close. And even with time, he likely wont ever be. Did the FO draft the wrong person or is something wrong with development in the minors? We thought Royce would play short, then Lee, now we’re already looking at who is coming next. None project to be as good as what we had. So yeah, let’s dumpster dive for a SS. Lets bargain bin shop for a new team with .33million. Who’s out there? Yes, $33mil is going to buy us a team to go all the way. Without the one thing a team needs, a truly competent SS.
  14. Squirrel
    An infected shoulder is no joke and can be serious https://www.healthline.com/health/bacterial-joint-inflammation
  15. Squirrel
    Or c) you’ve just now jinxed him to a hitless streak
  16. Squirrel
    It seems to be for some. And that’s the post I responded to. I agree it’s not incomprehensible. But for some, who don’t read thoroughly, that one sentence makes it clearer.
  17. Squirrel
    Keep in mind, his salary isn’t the reason the Twins don’t/won’t spend money. And his salary isn’t the reason the Twins can’t seem to win. All this is is making Correa the scapegoat
  18. Squirrel
    Some of the younger pitchers are already being pushed and stretched and nearing their season limits, as Seth pointed out. I don’t think giving these young pitchers 3 or 4 innings here and there for the remainder of the season hampers their development as starters. It will show these pitchers what to expect in terms of ML level so they themselves can prepare better for the next year.
  19. Squirrel
    Yeah, I don’t think people read this too closely. But then again, I don’t think Seth stated it explicitly enough, either. He said: ‘In doing this, it is absolutely crucial to set a tone with the team that this is about creating opportunities and giving more people a chance to work and get innings and try to make their case for a 2026 roster spot. The hitters need to know that this is about development and opportunity, but they are working under the same lens, trying to make an impression for 2026 and beyond. The goal is always to win as well and that will be the goal in every game. “We believe that each and every one of these pitchers has a big-league arm and a big-time, big-league future and that journey starts now.”’ If he had said ‘In doing this for the remainder of this season…’ it would have been clearer. In my opinion, in a lost season like this, yes, absolutely, see what you have to help with the planning for next season, but giving pitchers like Ryan his regular workload. We hear on these boards too often ‘so and so wasn’t given a chance’ so give them a chance. Through the rest of this season.
  20. Squirrel
    But I think it affects all players in the 40-man whether or not they’ve seen any or little MLB?
  21. Squirrel
    I don’t care if they liked it. I need to like it for it to be legit 🙂
  22. Squirrel
    I get my MLB package for free, so watching every so often I usually see something I haven’t before. If I had season tickets, though, I’d probably be mad
  23. Squirrel
    Ah yes … facts … don’t screw up the narratives of those who aren’t in the know and think they do
  24. Squirrel
    I’m going to reiterate something that is being lost. This was a SELLER’S MARKET. We should have gotten better returns and did not, especially for those with years of control left. And what we got does not signal well to a future rebuild. I don’t mind selling. It was the right call to make. But how this was done and the returns netted were not great, imo.
  25. Squirrel
    I can’t be don’t agree with this take at all. You sell off a team to rebuild. We sold low on a lot of good pieces for a mediocre return. That is not rebuilding. And you said the other day that money was the reason for Duran. This was a seller’s market and we had goods to sell … we came back with less than. This isn’t about rebuilding or retooling. We didn’t get the pieces to do either.
×
×
  • Create New...